Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT?

Cilt: 48 Sayı: 2 2 Temmuz 2023
PDF İndir
TR EN

Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT?

Öz

Purpose: Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Consensus for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is developed to evaluate the lung involvement on chest computed tomography (CT) and create a common reporting lexicon. Aim of this study is to determine the frequency of CT features in sex and age groups in patients with COVID-19, compare the findings according to the RSNA consensus classifications, and evaluate the compatibility of the classifications and findings. Materials and Methods: Chest CT images of 281 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated. Patients were noted in the appropriate RSNA consensus class. The patients’ data were analyzed by group according to age and sex. Results: The main findings included ground-glass opacity, consolidation, and air bronchogram. The common involvement patterns were as follows: bilateral, peripheral, and multifocal. The rates for the typical, atypical, and indeterminate classifications, according to the RSNA consensus, were 63.6%, 9.6%, and 27.0%, respectively. Subpleural fibrous streaking was more frequent in males. Air bronchogram, lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, subpleural fibrous streaking, bilateral involvement, and a typical classification on CT features were more frequent in the ≥ 65-year age group. Conclusion: While the typical appearance classification has results consistent with the findings, we think that the classifications specified as indeterminate and atypical appearance do not show sufficient agreement with the findings and revision is needed for correct diagnostic guidance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

COVID-19, CT features, age, sex, RSNA consensus

Kaynakça

  1. Ufuk F, Savas R. Chest CT features of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50:664-78.
  2. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727-33.
  3. Simpson S, Kay FU, Abbara S, Bhalla S, Chung JH, Chung M et al. Radiological Society of North America expert consensus statement on reporting chest CT findings related to COVID-19. Endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American College of Radiology, and RSNA - secondary publication. J Thorac Imaging. 2020;35:219-27.
  4. Dilek O, Kaya O, Akkaya H, Ceylan C, Kızıloglu A, Sahin Eker B et al. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CO-RADS: evaluation of classification in radiology practice. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021;5:615-20.
  5. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;14:1-7.
  6. Rocha CO, Prioste TAD, Faccin CS, Folador L, Tonettoa MS, Knijnik PG et al. Diagnostic performance of the RSNA-proposed classification for COVID-19 pneumonia versus pre-pandemic controls. Braz J Infect Dis. 2022;26:101665.
  7. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan H, Chen C, Lv W et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020;296:32-40.
  8. Yu M, Xu D, Lan L, Tu M, Liao R, Cai S et al. Thin-section chest CT imaging of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: comparison between patients with mild and severe disease. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;23;2:e200126.
  9. Chen H, Ai L, Lu H et al. Clinical and imaging features of COVID-19. Radiol Infect Dis 2020;7:43-50.
  10. Hani C, Trieu NH, Saab I, Dangeard S, Bennani S, Chassagnon G et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: A review of typical CT findings and differential diagnosis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020;101:263-8.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sözütok, S., Kaya, Ö., Dılek, O., Parlatan, C., Kaya, N. N., Pişkin, F. C., & Köse, S. (2023). Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT? Cukurova Medical Journal, 48(2), 593-600. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1283652
AMA
1.Sözütok S, Kaya Ö, Dılek O, vd. Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT? Cukurova Med J. 2023;48(2):593-600. doi:10.17826/cumj.1283652
Chicago
Sözütok, Sinan, Ömer Kaya, Okan Dılek, vd. 2023. “Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT?”. Cukurova Medical Journal 48 (2): 593-600. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1283652.
EndNote
Sözütok S, Kaya Ö, Dılek O, Parlatan C, Kaya NN, Pişkin FC, Köse S (01 Temmuz 2023) Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT? Cukurova Medical Journal 48 2 593–600.
IEEE
[1]S. Sözütok vd., “Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT?”, Cukurova Med J, c. 48, sy 2, ss. 593–600, Tem. 2023, doi: 10.17826/cumj.1283652.
ISNAD
Sözütok, Sinan - Kaya, Ömer - Dılek, Okan - Parlatan, Cenk - Kaya, Nazli Nida - Pişkin, Ferhat Can - Köse, Sevgül. “Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT?”. Cukurova Medical Journal 48/2 (01 Temmuz 2023): 593-600. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1283652.
JAMA
1.Sözütok S, Kaya Ö, Dılek O, Parlatan C, Kaya NN, Pişkin FC, Köse S. Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT? Cukurova Med J. 2023;48:593–600.
MLA
Sözütok, Sinan, vd. “Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT?”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 48, sy 2, Temmuz 2023, ss. 593-00, doi:10.17826/cumj.1283652.
Vancouver
1.Sinan Sözütok, Ömer Kaya, Okan Dılek, Cenk Parlatan, Nazli Nida Kaya, Ferhat Can Pişkin, Sevgül Köse. Evaluation of the RSNA consensus: is it sufficient for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with CT? Cukurova Med J. 01 Temmuz 2023;48(2):593-600. doi:10.17826/cumj.1283652