Machine learning-based analysis of MRI radiomics in the discrimination of classical and non-classical polycystic over syndrome
Öz
Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the value of radiomics analysis on T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) images in differentiating classical and non-classical polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
Materials and Methods: A total of 202 ovaries from 101 PCOS patients (mean age of 23±4 years) who underwent pelvic MRI between 2014 and 2022, were included in the study. Of the patients, 53 (52.5%) were phenotype A, 12 (11.9%) were phenotype B, 25 were phenotype C (25.1%), and 11 were phenotype D (10.9%). 130 (64.4%) of the ovaries were classical PCOS, 72 (35.6%) were non-classical PCOS. The ovaries were manually segmented in all axial sections using the 3D Slicer program. A total of 851 features were extracted. Python 2.3, Pycaret library was used for machine learning (ML) analysis. Datasets were randomly divided into train (70 %, 141) and test (30 %, 61) datasets. The performances of ML algorithms were compared with AUC, accuracy, recall, precision and F1 scores.
Results: Accuracy and AUC values in the training set ranged from 57%-73% and 0.50-0.73, respectively. The two best ML algorithms were Random Forest (rf) (AUC:0.73, accuracy:73%) and Gradient Boosting Classifier (gbc) (AUC:0.71, accuracy:70%). AUC, accuracy, recall and precision values and F1 score of the blend model obtained from these two models were 0.70, 73 %, 56 %, 66%, 58%, respectively.
Conclusion: Radiomic features obtained from T2W MRI are successful in distinguishing between classical and non-classical PCOS.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Phenotypes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Machine Learning, Radiomics, Texture Analysis
Kaynakça
- Dumesic DA, Oberfield SE, Stener-Victorin E, Marshall JC, Laven JS, Legro RS. Scientific statement on the diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and molecular genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2015;36:487-25.
- Azziz R. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:321-36.
- Lizneva D, Suturina L, Walker W, Brakta S, Gavrilova-Jordan L, Azziz R. Criteria, prevalence, and phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:6-15.
- Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and sterility. 2004;81:19-25.
- Goodman NF, Cobin RH, Futterweit W, Glueck JS, Legro RS, Carmina E; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE); American College of Endocrinology (ACE); Androgen Excess and PCOS Society (AES). American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, And Androgen Excess And Pcos Society Disease State clinical review: guide to the best practices in the evaluation and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome--part 1. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:1291-300.
- Dewailly D, Lujan ME, Carmina E, Cedars MI, Laven J, Norman RJ et al. Definition and significance of polycystic ovarian morphology: a task force report from the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:334-52.
- Balen AH, Laven JS, Tan SL, Dewailly D. Ultrasound assessment of the polycystic ovary: international consensus definitions. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:505-14.
- Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:19-25.
- Brown M, Park AS, Shayya RF, Wolfson T, Su HI, Chang RJ. Ovarian imaging by magnetic resonance in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome and age-matched controls. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38:689-93.
- Kenigsberg LE, Agarwal C, Sin S, Shifteh K, Isasi CR, Crespi R, Ivanova J et al. Clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescent girls. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1302-9.e94.
