Araştırma Makalesi

Atipik ve tipik posterior reversibl ensefalopati sendromunda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme, klinik ve laboratuvar bulgularının karşılaştırılması

Cilt: 50 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, and laboratory findings in atypical and typical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study is to compare cases defined as typical and atypical Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) based on the regions of involvement and imaging features in terms of clinical findings and laboratory values. Materials and Methods: The study included 79 patients who were evaluated as PRES according to imaging and clinical findings between January 2012 and March 2022, had sufficient clinical and laboratory data, and had optimal magnetic resonance (MR) images. Thirty-two of the patients were male, 47 were female, and 61 patients were in the pediatric age group. All patients had non-contrast FLAIR, T1 and T2-weighted images, 24 patients had diffusion-weighted images, and 43 patients had contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Patients were divided into typical and atypical groups according to MR imaging findings. Each group was compared independently according to clinical and laboratory data. Results: Hemorrhage was detected in 2, diffusion restriction in 16, enhancement in 13, and lesions located in deep white and gray matter in 10 patients. According to the areas of involvement, parietooccipital was detected in 11 patients, posterior frontotemporal in 28 patients, cerebellar in 29 patients, brainstem in 5 patients, and thalamus in 6 patients. According to the localization, while the change in consciousness was observed in 41% of the typical group, this was more in the atypical group (72%). In addition, inorganic phosphorus and potassium values were lower in the atypical group. Change in consciousness was detected more in patients with enhancement compared to patients without enhancement. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values were significantly higher in the atypical group. No significant difference was detected in other data. Conclusion: Atypical localization and MR imaging features in PRES cases may lead to potential diagnostic difficulties and traps for radiologists evaluating these scans in emergency situations. In addition, some clinical and laboratory findings may be worse in atypical cases, and early and correct diagnosis is very important for treatment management.

Keywords

MRI , atypical features , Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)

Kaynakça

  1. Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 1: fundamental imaging and clinical features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1036-42.
  2. Falsetti P, Acciai C, Conticini E, Cantarini L, Frediani B. Atypical Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) in a Patient with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Curr Health Sci J. 2021;47:306-9.
  3. Triplett JD, Kutlubaev MA, Kermode AG, Hardy T. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): diagnosis and management. Pract Neurol. 2022;22:183-9.
  4. Raman R, Devaramane R, Jagadish GM, Chowdaiah S. Various imaging manifestations of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:64-70.
  5. Mahmood S, Talha KA, Mahmood W. Clinical features and location of intracranial edema in Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) Patients. Mymensingh Med J. 2020;29:633-7.
  6. Will AD, Lewis KL, Hinshaw DB Jr, Jordan K, Cousins LM, Hasso AN et al. Cerebral vasoconstriction in toxemia. Neurology. 1987;37:1555-7.
  7. Khan IR, Pai V, Mundada P, Sitoh YY, Purohit B. Detecting the uncommon imaging manifestations of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) in adults: a comprehensive illustrated guide for the trainee radiologist. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022;51:98-111.
  8. Keyserling HF, Provenzale JM. Atypical imaging findings in a near-fatal case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a child. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:219-21.
  9. Covarrubias DJ, Luetmer PH, Campeau NG. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: prognostic utility of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR images. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2002;23:1038-48.
  10. McKinney AM, Short J, Truwit CL, McKinney ZJ, Kozak OS, SantaCruz KS et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: incidence of atypical regions of involvement and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:904-12.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Gül Mert, Gülen, vd. “Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, and laboratory findings in atypical and typical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 50, sy 3, Eylül 2025, ss. 883-9, doi:10.17826/cumj.1720149.