Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts
Öz
-
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Kaynakça Bulunmuyor
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Editöre Mektup
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Ağustos 2016
Kabul Tarihi
23 Eylül 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 4
APA
Shanbhag, V. K. L. (2017). Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts. Cukurova Medical Journal, 42(4), 795-796. https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.326909
AMA
1.Shanbhag VKL. Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts. Cukurova Med J. 2017;42(4):795-796. doi:10.17826/cutf.326909
Chicago
Shanbhag, Vagish Kumar L. 2017. “Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts”. Cukurova Medical Journal 42 (4): 795-96. https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.326909.
EndNote
Shanbhag VKL (01 Aralık 2017) Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts. Cukurova Medical Journal 42 4 795–796.
IEEE
[1]V. K. L. Shanbhag, “Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts”, Cukurova Med J, c. 42, sy 4, ss. 795–796, Ara. 2017, doi: 10.17826/cutf.326909.
ISNAD
Shanbhag, Vagish Kumar L. “Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts”. Cukurova Medical Journal 42/4 (01 Aralık 2017): 795-796. https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.326909.
JAMA
1.Shanbhag VKL. Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts. Cukurova Med J. 2017;42:795–796.
MLA
Shanbhag, Vagish Kumar L. “Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 42, sy 4, Aralık 2017, ss. 795-6, doi:10.17826/cutf.326909.
Vancouver
1.Vagish Kumar L. Shanbhag. Controversy of human bite mark as evidence to sentence criminals in courts. Cukurova Med J. 01 Aralık 2017;42(4):795-6. doi:10.17826/cutf.326909
