Araştırma Makalesi

Dikkat ve öğrenme bozukluklarında WISC-R alt testleri ile psikiyatrik semptom grupları arasındaki ilişki

Cilt: 43 Sayı: 4 29 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
EN TR

Relationship between WISC-R subtests and psychiatric symptom groups in attention and learning disorders

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or learning disorder (LD), we aimed to investigate the differentiating capacity of several instruments including Weschler Intelligence Tests (WISC-R) and Learning Disorder Battery.

Materials and Methods: The children (72-131 mo.) that where diagnosed with ADHD and/or LD (total n:81, boy n:63 [77.8%]) were included.  While the children were tested, active symptoms were remitted in a part of children (Clinical Global Impression below 3). Therefore, participants’ active diagnoses were ADHD: 11, LD: 33, both: 15, or remitted: 22, and the children were grouped accordingly. Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and LD Battery were used.

Results: The cases with LD (LD plus both) had significantly worse scores in all tests of LD Battery except for “duration of reading” and all subscores of WISC-R except for “similarities” compared to the cases without LD. The cases with ADHD (ADHD plus both) had significantly worse scores only in “draw a clock” of LD Battery and “cipher” of WISC-R compared to the cases without ADHD. 

Conclusion: WISC-R and LD Battery are valid and reliable instruments to differentiate several interrelated disorders (LD, ADHD, and/or both) and they have a good predictive validity to differentiate the cases that respond well to the treatments.


Keywords

WISC-R,LD Battery,ADHD,Learning Disorder,psychometrics

Kaynakça

  1. 1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). DSM-IV Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru El Kitabı. (Yeniden gözden geçirilmiş baskı.) (DSM-IV-TR). Washington D.C: APA. 2000;45-46.
  2. 2. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (APA). DSM V Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru El Kitabı. E. Köroğlu (Çev). Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği. 2014.
  3. 3. Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA. Dyslexia (Spesific Reading Disability). Biological Psychiatry. 2005;57:1301-1309.
  4. 4. Solan HA, Larson S, Shelly-Tremblay J, Ficarra A. “Role Of Visual Attention İn Cognition and Control Of Oculomotor Readiness İn Silverman, M. Students With Reading Disabilities”, Journal Of Learning Disabilities. 2001;34:107-118.
  5. 5. Clyde-Francks I, Laurence MP, Anthony PM. The Genetic Basis of Dyslexia. Lancet Neurology. 2002;1:483–90.
  6. 6. Miranda A, Soriano M, Fernández I, Meliá A. Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Impact of Age and Learning Disailities. Learning Disability Quarterly.2008;31:171-185.
  7. 7. Germano E, Gagliano A, Curatolo P. Comorbidity of ADHD and Dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2010;35(5):475-493.
  8. 8. Mayes SD, Calhoun SL, Crowell EW. Learning Disabilities and ADHD; Overlapping Spectrum Disorders. Journal Learning Disability. 2000;3:417-424.
  9. 9. Turgut S. “Özgül Öğrenme Güçlüğünde Nöropsikolojik Profil’’ Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2008.
  10. 10. Öngider N, Baykara NB, Akay AP. Bir Çocuk Psikiyatrisi Polikliniğinde Ayaktan İzlenen Olgulardan DEHB ve/veya ÖÖB Tanısı Konan Çocukların WISC-R Testi Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması Yeni Symposium. 2008;46(1):17-22.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Baykal, Saliha, vd. “Dikkat ve öğrenme bozukluklarında WISC-R alt testleri ile psikiyatrik semptom grupları arasındaki ilişki”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 43, sy 4, Aralık 2018, ss. 785-91, doi:10.17826/cumj.345012.