Evaluation of short term outcomes of patients undergone transurethral resection with plasmakinetic energy for benign prostate hyperplasia
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate short term outcomes of patients undergone transurethral resection with plasmakinetic energy for benign prostate hyperplasia and to present safety and efficacy of the procedure. Material and Method:86 patients applied to our clinic between March 2011 and February 2012 were enrolled into the study. PSS scores, uroflowmetry, post voiding residual urine, prostate volumes of the patients were recorded. Post operative urethral stricture, bladder neck stricture, incontinance rates were noted. Data assessed after six months were compared to peroperative data. After the operations, the surgeons evaluated their comfort of surgery with visual analog scale from 0 to 10. Results: 24 of 86 patients were hospitalized for acute urinary retention. One patient was hospitalized because of hematuria. Peroperative IPSS was 22.2. at post operative sixth month, mean IPSS was 6.8. VAS scores of surgeons was; to assess visual comfort was 7.41, to assess coagulation was 7.62. Conclusion:After evaluating the data and literature, we believe bipolar plasmakinetik TUR is a safe and comforting method to treat bladder outlet obstruction with goog hemodynamic stability.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Fong YK, Milani S and Djavan B. Natural history and clinical predictors of clinical progression in benign prostatic hyperplasia Current Opinion Urology. 2005; 15:35-38
- Glynn RJ, Campion EW, Bouchard GR, Silbert JE. The development of benign prostatic hyperplasia among volunteers in the normative aging study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121:78-90
- Neal DE. Transurethral prostatectomy. Br J Surg. 1994; 81:484-5.
- Tkocz M, Prajsner A. Comparison of long-term results of transurethral incision of prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate, in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002; 21:112-6.
- Yang Q,Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Wilt TJ, Abrams P. Transurethral incision compared with transurethral resection of the prostat efor bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Urol. 2001; 165:152632
- Madersbacher S, Marberger M. Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? BJU Int. 1999; 83:227-37
- Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC et al. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. New Engl J Med. 1995; 332:75-9.
- Morgan GE , Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP. Anesthesia for genitourinary surgery. Morgan E, Mikhail MS, Murray JM, Larson C, eds. Clinical Anestesiology, 3.ed. USA: McGraw-Hill Companies. 2002; 36:692-707.
- Kayhan Z. Boşaltım Sistemi ve Anestezi. Klinik Anestezi. 2. Baskı. İstanbul : Logos Yayıncılık. 1997; 27:340-54
- Gravenstein D. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome: A review of the pathophysiology and management. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84:438-46.
