Araştırma Makalesi

Perceptions of intern physicians about nursing profession: a qualitative research

Cilt: 44 29 Aralık 2019
PDF İndir
TR EN

Perceptions of intern physicians about nursing profession: a qualitative research

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine how the concept of ‘nursing’ was perceived by intern doctors working at a medical faculty hospital. 

Materials and Methods: This study used a qualitative approach. The study was conducted at a medical faculty with intern doctors using the word association test, and a conceptual analysis of the nursing profession was conducted. Study participants comprised 54 intern doctors (30 males and 24 females) who voluntarily participated in the study, and the saturation point was considered (n=54).

Results: Tags and frequency numbers of the themes were as follows: task conflict (f=62), negative perception burden (f=128) and professional nursing perception (f=117). The participants stated that nurses sometimes acted as physicians (occupational disorder). Nursing-related professional identity items included expressions such as altruism, devotion and self-sacrifice. The participants expressed a negative perception of nursing (e.g. sullenness and aggressiveness).

Conclusion: According to the results of the study, negative perception about nursing is dominant among the intern doctors. At the point of changing relations between colleagues, interprofessional education can be applied at the undergraduate level. Joint courses should be conducted under the name of doctor-nurse cooperation. However, the answers to some questions in clinical practice can help improve professional cooperation between nurses and physicians: Why cannot we turn negative perception into a positive one? And can interprofessional learning help?


Keywords

education,interprofessional education,nursing,qualitative study

Kaynakça

  1. McGowan Y, Humphries N, Burke H, Conry M, Morgan K. Through doctors’ eyes: A qualitative study of hospital doctor perspectives on their working conditions. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2013; 18(4): 874-91.
  2. Ridd M, Shaw A, Lewis G, Salisbury C. The patient–doctor relationship: A synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. British Journal of General Practice. 2009; 59 (561):116-33.
  3. Pavlovich-Davis S, Forman H, Simek PP. The nurse-physician relationship; can it be saved? Journal of Nursing Administration. 1998; 28 (7-8):17-20.
  4. Onan A, Turan S, Elcin M, Simsek N, Deniz KZ. A test adaptation of the modified readiness for Inter-professional Learning Scale in Turkish. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2017; 51(2): 207-15.
  5. Herath C, Zhou Y, Gan Y, Nakandawire N, Gong Y, Lu Z. A comparative study of interprofessional education in global health care: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(38):7336-43.
  6. Liaw SY, Siau C, Zhou WT, Lau TC. Interprofessional simulation-based education program: A promising approach for changing stereotypes and improving attitudes toward nurse–physician collaboration. Applied Nursing Research. 2014; 27(4): 258-60.
  7. Lockeman KS, Appelbaum NP, Dow AW, Orr S, Huff TA, Hogan CJ, Queen BA. The effect of an interprofessional simulation-based education program on perceptions and stereotypes of nursing and medical students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today. 2017; 58: 32-7.
  8. Glerean N, Hupli M, Talman K, Haavisto E. Young peoples’ perceptions of the nursing profession: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today. 2017; 57: 95-102. 9. Ten Hoeve Y, Jansen G, Roodbol P. The nursing profession: public image, self-concept and professional identity. A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2014; 70 (2): 295-309.
  9. Huffstutler SY, Stevenson SS, Mullins IL, Hackett DA, Lambert AW. The public’s image of nursing as described to baccalaureate prenursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing. 1998; 14(1): 7-13.
  10. Takase M, Kershaw E, Burt L. Nurse-environment misfit and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 35 (6): 819-26.