Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of Lindgren-Turan and Chevron osteotomies in the treatment of Hallux valgus

Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of Lindgren-Turan and Chevron osteotomies in the treatment of Hallux valgus

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this studywas to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of Lindgren-Turan and Chevron osteotomies in the treatment of hallux valgus.
Materials and Methods: This study included 34 patients with hallux valgus who underwent Lindgren-Turan (Group 1, n=16 patients, 20 feet) or Chevron (Group 2, n=18 patients, 20 feet) osteotomy between June 2010 and June 2014. HVA, IMA and DMAA changes and first metatarsal shortening was evaluated in weight bearing AP radiographs. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used in the clinical evaluation. Also, EQ-5D score was used in the evaluation of health-related quality of life of patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate subjective pain scores of patients preoperatively and postoperatively.
Results: There was no significant difference between Lindgren-Turan and Chevron osteotomy groups regarding preoperative and postoperative HVA, IMA and DMAA and shortening of the first metatarsus). Also, there was no significant differences between two groups regarding AOFAS and EQ-5D scores.
Conclusion: Both Lindgren-Turan and Chevron osteotomies are useful techniques in the surgical treatment of hallux valgus. Adequate pain relief, osteotomy union, deformity correction and high patient satisfaction rates can be achieved by two techniques.

Keywords

Hallux valgus , osteotomy , outcome

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux Valgus: demographics, etiology and radiographic assessment. Foot and Ankle International, 2007;28(7):759-77.
  2. 2. Uzun B, Baran Ö, Turan A C. Comparison of screw-fixation stabilities of first metatarsal shaft osteotomies: a biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010;44(1):70-75.
  3. 3. Richardson EG. Disorders of the hallux, Canale ST and Beaty JH, Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 2008; vol IV:4471-4586.
  4. 4. Coughlin, Michael J.; Anderson, Robert B.. Mann’s Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Published January 1, 2014. P 155-321.
  5. 5. Bayar B, Erel S, Şimşek İ E. The effects of taping and foot exercises on patients with hallux valgus: a preliminary study. Turk J Med Sci 2011; 41 (3): 403-409.
  6. 6. Rockett MS, Goss LR. Midshaft first ray osteotomies for hallux valgus. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2005;22:169-95.
  7. 7. Coetzee JC, Rippstein P. Surgical strategies: scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 2007;28(4):529-35.
  8. 8. Mann RA, Donatto KC. The chevron os- teotomy: a clinical and radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18(5):255-61.
  9. 9. Hirvensalo E, Böstman O, Törmälä P, Vain- ionpää S, Rokkanen P. Chevron osteotomy fixed with absorbable polyglycolide pins. Foot Ankle 1991;11(4):212-8.
  10. 10. Pring DJ, Coombes RRH, Closok JK. Chevron or Wilson Osteotomy: A comparision and fol- low-up (abstract). J. Bone and Joint Surg Am 1985; 67-B:671-2.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Günay, Mahmut, vd. “Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of Lindgren-Turan and Chevron osteotomies in the treatment of Hallux valgus”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 45, sy 3, Eylül 2020, ss. 778-94, doi:10.17826/cumj.654423.