Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of the modified Seldinger and trocar techniques in the percutaneous treatment of CE1 and CE3a hepatic hydatid cysts

Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of the modified Seldinger and trocar techniques in the percutaneous treatment of CE1 and CE3a hepatic hydatid cysts

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term results of the trocar and modified Seldinger techniques used in the percutaneous treatment of type CE1 and CE3a hepatic hydatid cysts.
Materials and Methods: The data of the patients with CE1 and CE3a hydatid cysts, treated by the catheterization technique between January 2015 and June 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Cyst type, cyst size and localization, treatment method applied, duration of catheterization and length of hospital stay were recorded. Follow-up period, cyst size at the last follow-up, and inactivation time were listed using the follow-up ultrasound reports. All of these variables were listed separately in the modified Seldinger and trocar techniques and compared statistically.
Results: The data of 126 CE1 and CE3a patients were included in the study. The modified Seldinger technique was used in 36 patients, and the trocar technique was used in 90 patients. The mean follow-up period was 1185.36 ± 426.02 days. The efficacy of the treatment was at the rate of 97.2% in the modified Seldinger technique and 97.7% in the trocar technique. In total, recurrence was seen in 2.3% of the patients. The duration of catheterization and length of hospital stay were found to be significantly lower in the trocar technique compared to the modified Seldinger technique. The inactivation process was faster in the modified Seldinger technique.
Conclusion: Both the modified Seldinger and trocar techniques are effective treatment modalities that can be used safely in the treatment of CE1 and CE3a hepatic hydatid cysts.

Keywords

hydatid cysts,CE1 and CE3a hepatic hydatid cysts,echinococcus granulosus,trocar technique,modified Seldinger technique

Kaynakça

  1. Aydın Y, Çelik M, Ulaş AB, Eroğlu A. Transdiaphragmatic approach to liver and lung hydatid cysts. Turk J Med Sci. 2012;42(2): 1388-1393. doi:10.3906/sag-1204-22
  2. Altinel F, Tunçel D, Öztürk A, Açıkalın M. Alt Ekstremiteye Yayılım Gösteren Primer Intrakranial Kist Hidatik: Olgu Sunumu. Cukurova Medical Journal 2014;39:589-593 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cumj/issue/4190/55138
  3. McManus DP, Zhang W, Li J, Bartley PB. Echinococcosis. Lancet 2003;362:1295–304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14573-4
  4. Kuş,M , Arer İ , Akkapulu N , Yabanoğlu H . "Karaciğer subkapsüler kist hidatik". Cukurova Medical Journal 2017;42:564-566 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cumj/issue/26525/323994
  5. Yazıcı P, Aydın Ü, Ersin S, Kaplan H. Splenic Hydatid Cyst: Clinical Study. Eurasian J Med. 2007; 39: 25-27.
  6. Turgut AT, Akhan O, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Sonographic Spectrum of Hydatid Disease. Ultrasound Quarterly 2008;24:17-29. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318168f0d1.
  7. WHO Informal Working Group. International classification of ultrasound images in cystic echinococcosis for application in clinical and field epidemiological settings. Acta Trop 2003;85:253–261 doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00223-1
  8. Bhutani N, Kajal P. Hepatic echinococcosis:A review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018;36:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.10.032.
  9. Smego RA Jr, Sebanego P. Treatment options for hepatic cystic echinococcosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2005;9(2):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.08.001
  10. Bosanac ZB, Lisanin L. Percutaneous drainage of hydatid cyst in the liver as a primary treatment: review of 52 consecutive cases with long-term follow-up. Clin Radiol 2000;55:839–48. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0543

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Turgut, Bekir, ve Nahide Baran. “Comparison of the modified Seldinger and trocar techniques in the percutaneous treatment of CE1 and CE3a hepatic hydatid cysts”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 45, sy 2, Haziran 2020, ss. 588-94, doi:10.17826/cumj.675478.