Learning approach preferences of medical students in different grades
Öz
Purpose: In order to support medical students’ learning- the manner in which their learning occurs - the quality and development of the learning process needs to be better understood. This research aims to determine the learning approaches preferred by medical school students and the changes that occur over time.
Materials and Methods: A Cross-sectional study was applied, including in the follow-up study. The study group comprised first-year students enrolled at Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine from 2011 to 2015 (n = 2714). The follow-up study was conducted in May 2016. This time 1195 students participated. The “Learning Approaches and Study Skills Scale” (ASSIST) was utilized. The scores of the students' learning approaches in the first year were compared to examine the changes in the learning approaches they preferred in the research over the years. In addition, students' first and second scores were compared.
Results: Participation rate of the study was 80%. Students who completed the ASSIST both times (n = 1195) resulted in a response rate of 55%. Learning approaches scores of students between 2011 and 2014 were ranked strategic, deep, and surface learning approaches, respectively. However, in 2015 it was ranked deep, strategic, and surface learning. cohorts. Medical students preferred the strategic learning approach in the first year. Their preference differed in the second assessment. Surface learning scores increased when compared with the first assessment.
Conclusion: Learning skills of students should be supported not only in the first year but also throughout the entire teaching period. Strategic and deep learning scores decreased in the second assessment, while the mean score of the surface learning approach increased in all.
Materials and Methods: A Cross-sectional study was applied, including in the follow-up study. The study group comprised first-year students enrolled at Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine from 2011 to 2015 (n = 2714). The follow-up study was conducted in May 2016. This time 1195 students participated. The “Learning Approaches and Study Skills Scale” (ASSIST) was utilized. The scores of the students' learning approaches in the first year were compared to examine the changes in the learning approaches they preferred in the research over the years. In addition, students' first and second scores were compared.
Results: Participation rate of the study was 80%. Students who completed the ASSIST both times (n = 1195) resulted in a response rate of 55%. Learning approaches scores of students between 2011 and 2014 were ranked strategic, deep, and surface learning approaches, respectively. However, in 2015 it was ranked deep, strategic, and surface learning. cohorts. Medical students preferred the strategic learning approach in the first year. Their preference differed in the second assessment. Surface learning scores increased when compared with the first assessment.
Conclusion: Learning skills of students should be supported not only in the first year but also throughout the entire teaching period. Strategic and deep learning scores decreased in the second assessment, while the mean score of the surface learning approach increased in all.
Anahtar Kelimeler
learning approaches, medical students, learning preferences, learning skills, medical education
Destekleyen Kurum
Hacettepe University Scientific Research Coordination Unit
Proje Numarası
Project Number: THD-2016-11789
Kaynakça
- 1. General Medical Council. (1993). Tomorrow’s doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: GMC
- 2. Newble, D.I., & Entwistle, N.J. (1986). Learning styles and approaches: Implications for medical education. Med Educ. 20(3):162–175.
- 3. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: I – outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol. 46:4–11.
- 4. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II – outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. Br J Educ Psychol. 46:115–27.
- 5. Entwistle, N, & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educ Psychol Rev. 16(4):325–345.
- 6. Senemoğlu, N. (2011). College of education students’ approaches to learning and study skills. Educ Sci. 36(160):65–80.
- 7. Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: a matter of style or approach? In: Sternberg RJ and Zhang LF, editors. Perspective on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; p. 73–102.
- 8. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). The society for research into higher education teaching for quality learning at university. USA: McGraw Hill.
- 9. Abraham, R.R., Kamath, A., Upadhya, S., & Ramnarayan, K. (2006). Learning approaches to physiology of undergraduates in an Indian medical school. Med Educ. 40(9): 916–923.
- 10. Watkins, D. (2000). Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural perspective. Sch Leader Manag. 20(2):161–173.
