Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of shock index and modified shock index in estimation of MACE parameters in patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction

Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2021
Pınar Yeşim Akyol *, Zeynep Karakaya , Fatih Topal , Rıfat Urnal , Murat Acar , Umut Payza , Serkan Bilgin
PDF İndir
EN TR

Evaluation of shock index and modified shock index in estimation of MACE parameters in patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction

Abstract

Purpose: Shock index and modified shock index were used to evaluate the hemodynamic status of patients with trauma, pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of shock index and modified shock index as an indicator of major adverse cardiac event parameters in patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction. Materials and Methods: A total of 194 patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction were included in the study. Shock index and modified shock index were evaluated regarded to predicting major adverse cardiac event and major adverse cardiac event parameters separately. Results: A total of 194 patients were included in the study. The 7-day mortality was 2.4% in the shock index <0.66 group and 11.6% in the shock index ≥ 0.66 group. The rate of development of major adverse cardiac event was 4.0% for shock index <0.66 and 17.4% for shock index 0.66. The 7-day mortality was 3.0% in the modified shock index <0.93 group and 11.1% in the modified shock index 0.93 group. The rate of major adverse cardiac event was 3.8% in the modified shock index <0.93 group and 19.4% in the modified shock index ≥ 0.93 group. Conclusion: Shock index and modified shock index are useful methods for estimating both major adverse cardiac event and major adverse cardiac event parameters separately.

Keywords

STEMI , Shock index , modified shock index , MACE

Kaynakça

  1. Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E, et al. Comparison of shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:685–90.
  2. Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD, Carlton E, et al. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1426-30.
  3. Toosi MS, Merlino JD, Leeper KV. Prognostic Value of the Shock Index Along With Transthoracic Echocardiography in Risk Stratification of PatientsWith Acute Pulmonary Embolism[J]. Am J Cardiol 2008;101(5):700–5.
  4. Guo ZJ, Lin Q, Zi XR, Xu Q, Liu HT, et al. Correlation of computed tomography angiography parameters and shock index to assess the ransportation risk in aortic dissection patients. Radiol Med 2015;120(4):386–92.
  5. Bilkova D, Motovska Z, Widimsky P, Dvorak J, Lisa L, et al. Shock index: a simple clinical parameter for quick mortality risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction.Can J Cardiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;27(6):739-42.
  6. Huang B, Yang Y, Zhu J, Liang Y, Tan H, et al. Usefulness of the admission shock index for predicting short-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2014;114:1315–21.
  7. Spyridopoulos I, Noman A, Ahmed JM, Das R, Edwards R, et al. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Jun;4(3):270-7.
  8. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal (2018) 39, 119–177
  9. Liu YC, Liu JH, Fang ZA, Shan GL, Xu J, et al. Modified shock index and mortality rate of emergency patients. World J Emerg Med 2012;3:114–7.
  10. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61 (4):e78-140.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Akyol, Pınar Yeşim, vd. “Evaluation of shock index and modified shock index in estimation of MACE parameters in patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 46, sy 2, Haziran 2021, ss. 410-7, doi:10.17826/cumj.792805.