Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to use ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) and endotracheal tube (ETT) in elective septorhinoplasty operation and to compare the hemodynamic differences and postoperative complications during the application.
Materials and Methods: In the prospective planned study, ASA I-II and 60 patients aged 18-35 were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30, n = 30). After the standard anesthesia technique, Group E was placed ETT, Group P PLMA. Patients’ demographic characteristics, number of attempts for correct insertion, hemodynamic changes, postoperative nausea, vomiting, sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia and surgical satisfaction evaluated.
Results: Heart rate was higher in Group E than in Group P at the 1st min after anesthesia induction, at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 10th min after airway insertion, and at the 3rd min after extubation. Difficulty in swallowing at postoperative was higher in Group E than in Group P. Insertion rates of the devices, were similar. Surgical satisfaction was higher in Group E than in Group P. Adequate tidal volume was provided in both groups during the operation.
Conclusion: The use of PLMA in airway management in outpatient septorhinoplasty operations creates less hemodynamic response compared to the use of ETT, less airway complications are seen and thanks to its flexibility, it does not interfere with the surgical area. PLMA may be an alternative to ETT when the insertion of the airway devices is performed by experienced physicians.
Keywords
Endotracheal intubation , laryngeal mask airway , rhinoplasty
Kaynakça
- [1] Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005;52:739–60.
- [2] Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell’Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J ClinAnesth 2003;15(6):428-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(03)00085-0
- [3] Kaplan, A., Crosby, G. J., & Bhattacharyya, N. (2004). Airway Protection and the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Sinus and Nasal Surgery. The Laryngoscope, 114(4), 652–655. doi:10.1097/00005537-200404000-00010
- [4] Wheeler M. Proseal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance. Pediatric Anesthesia 2006;16:297–301.
- [5] Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M. Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method.ActaOtorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:111–4.
- [6]Karbasforushan A, Hemmatpoor B, Makhsosi BR, Mahvar T, Golfam P, Khiabani B. The effect of pharyngeal packing during nasal surgery on the incidence of post operative nausea, vomiting, and sore throat. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2014;26:219–23.
- [7] Tulunay M, Tulunay FC.Assessment of pain and measurements of pain. İn: Erdine S. (ed). Pain. 1. Edition. Istanbul, Nobel bookstore; 2000: 91-110.
- [8] Tural K. Comparison of the Efficiency and Complications of Laryngeal Mask Airway and Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway in Short-Term Surgeries.tez2.yok.gov.tr 2008.
- [9] Doksrod S, Lofgren B, Nordhammer A, Svendsen MV, Gisselsson L, Raeder J. Reinforced laryngeal mask airway compared with endotracheal tube for adenotonsillectomies. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:941–6.
- [10].HashemJarineshin 1; SaeedKashani 1; MajidVatankhah 1; AlirezaAbdulahzadeBaghaee 1; SaharSattari 1; FereydoonFekrat 1. Better Hemodynamic Profile of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Compared to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 August; 17(8): e28615.
