Büyümeme ve Kamu Tercihi: Sürdürülebilir Bir Gelecek İçin Kişisel Çıkarları ve Güç Dinamiklerini Yönlendirmek

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 51 - 64, 31.05.2025

Sule Gunduz - Ozgur

https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1578157

Öz

Bu makale, büyümemeyi kamu tercihi perspektifinden incelemektedir. Büyümeme hem politik hem de ekonomik bir kavram olduğundan, kamu tercihi, büyümemenin çeşitli boyutlarını analiz etmek için yararlı bir çerçeve sunar. Büyümeme, ekolojik dengeyi sağlamak, eşitsizliği azaltmak ve toplumsal refahı iyileştirmek için kaynak tüketiminde planlı bir azalmayı teşvik ederek, sürekli ekonomik büyümenin baskın ideolojisine meydan okur. Makale, büyümeme politikalarını uygulamanın zorluklarını vurgulayarak, seçmenler, politikacılar ve bürokratlar gibi kilit sosyal aktörlerin benmerkezci motivasyonlarına işaret etmektedir. Seçmenler genellikle bir parti veya politika seçerken kendi çıkarlarını önceliklendirirken, politikacılar yeniden seçilmeye odaklanır. Bürokratlar ise kendi bütçelerini ençoklaştırmayı amaçlar. Bu bireysel çıkarlar genellikle büyümemenin daha geniş hedefleriyle çatışır ve daha sürdürülebilir ve eşitlikçi bir topluma geçişi zorlaştırır. Makale, büyümemeyi kamusal seçim perspektifinden eleştirel bir şekilde analiz ederek, içselleşmiş çıkarların oluşturduğu sistemik engelleri vurgular. Ayrıca, hükümet kararlarının çoğunlukla kendi çıkarını gözeten bireylerin kolektif eylemlerinin sonucu olduğu ve bu nedenle kamu tercihi perspektifinin, büyümeme yanlıları için yararlı içgörüler sağlama potansiyeline sahip olduğu savunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Büyümeme , Kişisel çıkar , Sürdürülebilirlik , Kamu Tercihi.

Degrowth and Public Choice: Navigating Private Interests and Power Dynamics for a Sustainable Future

Öz

This article examines degrowth through the lens of public choice theory. Since degrowth is both a political and economic concept, public choice provides a useful framework for analyzing its various dimensions. Degrowth challenges the dominant ideology of constant economic expansion, promoting a deliberate reduction in resource consumption to restore ecological balance, reduce inequality, and improve collective well-being. However, the article emphasizes the difficulties of implementing degrowth policies, pointing to the self-interested motivations of key social actors: voters, politicians, and bureaucrats. Voters often prioritize their own utility when choosing a party or policy, while politicians focus on reelection and bureaucrats aim to expand their department’s budget. These individual interests often conflict with the broader goals of degrowth, making the transition to a more sustainable and equitable society difficult. The article critically analyzes degrowth from a public choice perspective, underscoring the systemic obstacles posed by inherent self-interest. It also argues that since government outcomes are often the result of the collective actions of self-interested individuals, the public choice perspective has the potential to provide useful insights for degrowthers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Degrowth , Self-interest , Sustainability , Public Choice

Kaynakça

• Akbulut, B. (2021). Degrowth. Rethinking Marxism, 33(1), 98-110.
• Alcott, B. (2005). Jevons' paradox. Ecological economics, 54(1), 9-21.
• Alexander, S. (2017). Frugal abundance in an age of limits: Envisioning a degrowth economy. In E. Garcia, M. Martinez-Iglesias and P. Kirby (Eds.). Transitioning to a Post-Carbon Society: Degrowth, Austerity and Wellbeing, (pp.159-179). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Buchanan, J. M. (1993). Public choice after socialism. Public Choice, 77(1), 67-74.
• Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1999). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Liberty Fund.
• Buchanan, J. M. (2003). Politics without romance. Policy, 19(3), 13-18.
• Buchanan, J.M. (2004). Constitutional political economy. In C. K. Rowley, F. Schneider (Eds.). The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Springer.
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1988). Is public choice ımmoral--The case for the nobel lie. Virginia Law Review, 74, 179-189.
• Chiengkul, P. (2018). The degrowth movement: Alternative economic practices and relevance to developing countries. Alternatives, 43(2), 81-95.
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row Publishers.
• Ekelund Jr, R. B., & Hébert, R. F. (1996). A history of economic theory and method. McGraw-Hill.
• Fitzpatrick, N., Parrique, T., & Cosme, I. (2022). Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 1-19.
• Gabriel, C. A., Nazar, S., Zhu, D., & Kirkwood, J. (2019). Performance beyond economic growth: Alternatives from growth-averse enterprises in the global south. Alternatives, 44(2-4), 119-137.
• Galbraith, J. K. (1977). The age of uncertainty. Houghton Mifflin.
• Garcia, E., & Martinez-Iglesias, M. (2017). Towards the post-carbon society: Searching for signs of the transition and identifying obstacles. In E. Garcia, M. Martinez-Iglesias and P. Kirby (Eds.). Transitioning to a Post-Carbon Society: Degrowth, Austerity and Wellbeing, (pp.57-86). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press.
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (2011). From bioeconomics to degrowth: Georgescu-Roegen’s “new economics” In M. Bonaiuti (Ed.). Eight Essays. Routledge.
• Gorz, A. (1980). Ecology as politics. Black Rose Books.
• Gräbner-Radkowitsch, C. & Strunk, B. (2023a). Degrowth and the global south: The twin problem of global dependencies. Ecological Economics: 213.
• Gräbner-Radkowitsch, C. & Strunk, B. (2023b). Degrowth and the global south?: How institutionalism can complement a timely discourse on ecologically sustainable development in an unequal world. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 476-483.
• Hardin, R. (1990). Public choice versus democracy. Nomos, 32, 184-203.
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
• Heilbroner, R. L. (1999). The worldly philosophers: The lives, times and ıdeas of the great economic thinkers. Touchstone.
• Hickel, J. (2018). Is it possible to achieve a good life for all within planetary boundaries? Third World Quarterly, 40(1), 18-35.
• Hickel, J. (2021). What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations, 18(7), 1105-1111.
• Hickel, J. & Kallis, G. (2019). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469-486.
• Jakob, M. & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447-468.
• Jevons, W. S. (1865). The coal question; An ınquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal mines. Macmillan and Co.
• Kallis, G., Demaria, F. & D’Alisa G. (2015). Introduction: Degrowth. In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, G. Kallis (Eds.). Degrowth A vocabulary for a new era, (pp. 1-18). Routledge.
• Keynes, J. M. (1923). A tract on monetary reform. MacMillan and Co., Limited.
• Landes, D. S. (1990). Why are we so rich and they so poor? The American Economic Review, 80(2), 1-13.
• Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to growth. Polity.
• Lehmann, C., Delbard, O., & Lange, S. (2022). Green growth, a-growth or degrowth? Investigating the attitudes of environmental protection specialists at the German environment Agency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130306.
• Lorek, S., Cohen, M., & Alfredsson, E. (2024). Realizing sustainable consumption and production. In Lena Partzsch (ed) The Environment in Global Sustainability Governance: Perceptions, Actors, Innovations (pp. 246-265). Bristol University Press.
• McCloskey, S. (2020). Development education, COVID-19 and Neoliberalism. In P. Carmody, G. McCann, C. Colleran, C. O’Halloran (Eds.). COVID-19 in the Global South Impacts and Responses, (pp. 39-48). Bristol University Press.
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books. Meissner, M. (2022). Minimalist lifestyles and the path to degrowth: Towards an engaged mindfulness. In Engaged Humanities: Rethinking Art, Culture, and Public Life (pp. 189-218). Amsterdam University Press.
• Mueller, D. C. (1987). The growth of government: A public choice perspective (L'expansion des administrations publiques vue sous l'angle des choix publics) (La expansión de la administración pública desde el punto de vista de la elección pública). Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund, 34(1), 115-149.
• Mueller, D. C. (2015). Public choice, social choice, and political economy. Public Choice, 163(3/4), 379-387.
• Muraca, B. & Schmelzer, M. (2017). Sustainable degrowth: Historical roots of the search for alternatives to growth in three regions. In I. Borowy and M. Schmelzer (Eds.). History of the Future of Economic Growth Historical Roots of Current Debates on Sustainable Degrowth, (pp. 174-197). Routledge.
• Niskanen, W. A. (2008). Reflections of a political economist: Selected articles on government policies and political processes. Cato Institute.
• Orchard, L., & Stretton, H. (1997). Public choice. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(3), 409-430.
• Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203-216.
• Parakram P. (2021). Green growth or degrowth? Evaluating the potential of technology for sustainability, Economics and Policy of Energy and Environment, 1, 21-36.
• Park, J. T. (2015). Climate change and capitalism. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 189-206.
• Pressman, S. (2004). What is wrong with public choice. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(1), 3-18.
• Rostow, W. W. (1992). Theorists of economic growth from David Hume to the present: With a perspective on the next century. Oxford University Press.
• Russell, H. (1990). Public choice versus democracy. Majorities and minorities. Nomos, 32, 184-203.
• Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public goods. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.
• Sarıöz Gökten, Y., & Gökten, K. (2023). Büyümeme: İmkan ve sınırlılıklar. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 18(40), 281-300.
• Tekçe, M. (2024). Sınırsız büyüme paradigmasına yükselen bir itiraz:" Büyümeme". Ekonomi-tek, 13(1), 122-139.
• Turnbull, T. (2018). Simulating the global environment: The British government’s response to'the limits to growth. In Histories of Technology, the Environment and Modern Britain (pp. 271-299). UCL Press.
• Van den Bergh , J.C.J.M., & Kallis, G. (2012). Growth, a-growth or degrowth to stay within planetary boundaries? Journal of Economic Issues, 46(4), 909-920.
• Wiefek, J., & Heinitz, K. (2018). Common good-oriented companies: Exploring corporate values, characteristics and practices that could support a development towards degrowth. Management Revue, 29(3), 311-331.