Farklı temizleyici solüsyonların ve kumlamanın akrilik ve copolyester plak arasındaki bağlantı dayanımına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2023, , 3 - 8, 31.01.2023

Özer İşisağ Kevser Karakaya Gülsüm Gökçimen Elif Karakuş

https://doi.org/10.5152/crds.2022.6264

Öz

Objective: Use of splints is one of the most preferred treatment procedures in temporomandibular disorders. Occlusal adjustment can be made with the addition of acrylic resin on the thermoplastic splints prepared with vacuum. The aim of the study is to examine the effects of denture cleaning tablets and sandblasting on the bond strength between acrylic resin and copolyester plates.

Methods: In the study, 36 copolyester plate samples were prepared and the prepared samples were divided into 2 main groups as sandblasted (n = 18) and unsanded (n = 18). Each main group was divided into 3 subgroups as Aktident tablet (n = 9), Protefix tablet (n = 9), and soaking in water (n = 9). Autopolymerizing acrylic was placed in the center of all prepared samples and expected to polymerize, and the shear bond strength between copolyester plates and autopolymerizing acrylic was evaluated.

Results: Shear bonding values of all samples with sandblasting were statistically significantly higher than samples without sandblasting (P < ,05). In the non-blasting group, the highest shear bond strength was found in the Protefix group (3.37 MPa), while the value of the Aktident group was the lowest (3.23 MPa). The highest value in the sandblasted group belongs to the Protefix group (5.37 MPa). The water group has the lowest value (4.76 MPa). There was no statistically significant difference between Aktident, Protefix, and water groups in both the groups with and without sandblasting (P > .05).

Conclusion: The bond between acrylic resin and copolyester plate can be enhanced by aluminum oxide sandblasting.

Farklı temizleyici solüsyonların ve kumlamanın akrilik ve copolyester plak arasındaki bağlantı dayanımına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Temporomandibular rahatsızlıklarda splint uygulanması sıklıkla tercih edilen tedavi prosedürlerindendir. Vakum ile hazırlanan termoplastik splintlerde akrilik rezin ilavesi ile okluzal uyumlama yapılabilmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, protez temizleme tabletlerinin ve kumlama işleminin akrilik rezin ve copolyester plaklar arasındaki bağlanma dayanımına etkisini incelemektir.

Yöntemler: Çalışmada 36 adet copolyester plak örneği hazırlanmış ve hazırlanan örnekler kumlanmış (n = 18) ve kumlanmamış (n = 18) olmak üzere iki ana gruba ayrılmıştır. Her ana grup ise aktident tablet (n = 9), protefix tablet (n = 9) ve suda (n = 9) bekletilmek üzere üç alt gruba ayrılmıştır. Hazırlanan tüm örneklerin merkezine otopolimerizan akrilik yerleştirilerek polimerize olması beklenilmiş ve copolyester plaklar ve otopolimerizan akrilik arasındaki makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Kumlama yapılan tüm örneklerin makaslama bağlanma değerleri, yapılmayan örneklerden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksektir (P < ,05). Kumlama yapılmayan grupta en yüksek makaslama bağlanma dayanımı Protefix grubunda bulunmuştur (3,37 MPa), Aktident grubunun değeri ise en düşüktür (3,23 MPa). Kumlama yapılan grupta en yüksek değer Protefix grubuna aittir (5,37 MPa). Su grubu ise en düşük değere sahiptir (4,76 MPa). Gerek kumlama yapılan gerekse yapılmayan gruplarda Aktident, Protefix ve su grubu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (P > ,05).

Sonuç: Akrilik rezin ve copolyester plak arasındaki bağlantı alüminyum oksit kumlaması ile artırılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Splint, copolyester plak, akrilik plak, kumlama, protez temizleyici

Anahtar Kelimeler

Splint, copolyester plate, acrylic plate, sandblasting, denture cleaner

Kaynakça

• 1. Bell WE. Clinical Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1982:128-171.
• 2. Yengin E. Temporomandibular Rahatsızlıklarda Teshis ve Tedavi. İstanbul: Dilek Matbaacılık; 2000:234-239.
• 3. Aydın M, Ozan O, Ramoğlu S. Temporomandibuler eklem bozukluklarında konservatif tedavi yaklaşımları: Okluzal splintler. ADO Klin Bil Derg. 2010;5:913-923.
• 4. Kuscu E, Klink A, Spintzyk S, Kraemer Fernandez PK, Huettig F. Bonding interface and repairability of 3D-printed intraoral splints: Shear bond strength to current polymers, with and without ageing. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(14):3935. [CrossRef]
• 5. Kerem K, Kurtulus ER, Ikbal L, Council of Ministers. Parison of the efficacy of two different types of splint used in patients with temporomandibularjoint disorders. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018;6: 5217-5224.
• 6. Selaimen CM, Jeronymo JC, Brilhante DP, Lima EM, Grossi PK, Grossi ML. Occlusal risk factors for temporomandibular disorders. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(3):471-477. [CrossRef]
• 7. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S, Sciote J. A contemporary and evidencebased view of canine protected occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(1):90-102. [CrossRef]
• 8. Manns A, Chan C, Miralles R. Influence of group function and canine guidance on electromyographic activity of elevator muscles. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57(4):494-501. [CrossRef]
• 9. Haralur SB, Alsubaiy EF. Management of post-treatment exacerbated temperomandibular disorder. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:67-69. [CrossRef]
• 10. Yalçın S, Aktaş İ. Diş hekimliğinde Temporomandibular Eklem Hastalarına Yaklaşım, Temporomandibular Bozuklukların Klinik Seyri. İstanbul: Vestiyer Yayın Grubu; 2010:89.
• 11. Terzioğlu H, Yurdukoru B, Böke K. Düşük okluzyon dikey boyutun iadesi: Temporomandibular ekleme etkilerinin magnetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi: Bir olgu nedeniyle. A.Ü. Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2001;28:217-222.
• 12. Abdallah HT. Hard occlusal splints made by vaccum machine versus 3D digital printed splints in Treatment of Muscle Pain (electromyogram). Egypt J Dent. 2018;64(1):443-456. [CrossRef]
• 13. Abubakar DP, Nagaral DSC, Fatima DT, Salgar DARGH, Qayum DSA, Parveen DF. Effect of denture cleansers on color stability and flexural strength of heat polymerized acrylic resin an in-vitro study. Sch Dent Sci. 2021;8(8):264-270. [CrossRef]
• 14. Alfouzan AF, AlNouwaisar AN, AlAzzam NF, et al. Power brushing and chemical denture cleansers induced color changes of prepolymerized CAD/CAM denture acrylic resins. Mater Res Express. 2021;8(8):85-402. [CrossRef]
• 15. Peracini A, Davi LR, de Queiroz Ribeiro N, de Souza RF, Lovato daSilva CH, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H. Effect of denture cleansers on physical properties of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J Prosthodont Res. 2010;54(2):78-83. [CrossRef]
• 16. Robinson JG, McCabe JF, Storer R. Denture bases: The effects of various treatments on clarity, strength and structure. J Dent. 1987; 15(4):159-165. [CrossRef]
• 17. Arab J, Newton JP, Lloyd CH. The importance of water temperature in denture cleaning procedures. J Dent. 1988;16(6):277-281. [CrossRef]
• 18. Wible E, Agarwal M, Altun S, et al. Long-term effects of different cleaning methods on copolyester retainer properties. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(2):221-227. [CrossRef]
• 19. Chung KH, Chung CY, Chung CY, Chan DC. Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(4):268-275. [CrossRef]
• 20. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: The effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2006; 22(3):283-290. [CrossRef]
• 21. Akın H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Guney U, Ozdemir A. Effect of sandblasting with different size of aluminum oxide particles on tensile bond strength of resilient liner to denture base. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2011;14:5-11.
• 22. Ferreira FM, Cézar Simamoto-Júnior P, Soares CJ, Ramos AMAM, Fernandes-Neto AJ. Effect of occlusal splints on the stress distribution on the temporomandibular joint disc. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(3): 324-329. [CrossRef]
• 23. Algabri RS, Alqutaibi AY. No evidence suggests that the clinical effectiveness of conventional occlusal splints is superior to that of psychosocial interventions for myofascial Tempromandibular disorders pain. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2017;17(4):399-401. [CrossRef]
• 24. Okeson JP. Critical commentary 1: Evaluation of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders for the recognition of an anterior disc displacement with reduction. J Orofac Pain. 2009;23(4):312-315.
• 25. Al-Ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Sloan P, Glenny AM. Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1(1):CD002778. [CrossRef]
• 26. Alowid A, Helaby B, Alqarni L. A case report of caries incident in a patient wearing an Essix type retainer. Authorea Preprints; 2021: 50-51.
• 27. Tekel N, Kahraman S. Temporomandibular eklem bozukluklarının tedavisinde oklüzal splintlerin kullanımı. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2006: 61-69.
• 28. Aydoğan F, Şenışık NE. Hareketli ortodontik aygıtları temizleme yöntemleri. Süleyman Demirel Univ Sağlık Bilimleri Derg. 2018;9:45- 53. [CrossRef]
• 29. Evran OE, İzgi AD. Farklı yöntemlerle polimerize edilen protez kaide materyallerinin eğilme direncine farklı protez temizleme tabletlerinin etkisi. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2020;30:451-456.
• 30. Kümbüloğlu Ö, Kaya E, Şahan M. Profitez temizleyici solüsyonların hassas tutuculu hareketli protezlerin tutucu lastik kısımlarının sertlikleri üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması. Selcuk Dent J. 2021;8: 76-81.
• 31. Durkan R, Ayaz EA, Bagis B, Gurbuz A, Ozturk N, Korkmaz FM, et al. ComParative effects of denture cleansers on physical properties of polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate base polymers. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):367-375. [CrossRef]
• 32. El Mekawy N, Algraisi MI, El Shaheed NH. In vitro Comparison of denture cleansers effect on locator attachment retentive male inserts (scanning electron microscope study). OHDM. 2018;17:1-8.
• 33. Nakhaei M, Mirmortazavi A, Ghanbari M, Ahmadi Z. Effect of ozone and two common denture cleaners on tensile bond strength and surface hardness of a silicone soft liner. Front Dent. 2019;16(5):351-356. [CrossRef]
• 34. Mian H, Pita MS, Do Nascimento C, et al. Shear bond strength of acrylic teeth to heat-curing denture base resin under different disinfectant methods. Int J Odontostomat. 2013;7:99-105.
• 35. Abdul-Razaq RW. The effect of two types of disinfectant on shear bond strength, hardness, roughness of two types of soft liners. J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2012;24:27-31.
• 36. Ates SM, Caglar I, Ozdogan A, Duymus ZY. The effect of denture cleansers on surface roughness and bond strength of a denture base resin. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(2):171-181. [CrossRef]
• 37. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(6):783-788. [CrossRef]
• 38. Nakano LJ, Lopes GR, Firmino AS, de Matos JD, Tango RN, PaesJunior TA. Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(5):e505-e510. [CrossRef]
• 39. Peng TY, Shimoe S, Fuh LJ, Lin CK, Lin DJ, Kaku M. Bonding and thermal cycling performances of two (poly) aryl–ether–ketone (PAEKs) materials to an acrylic denture base resin. Polymers. 2021; 13(4):543