MORPHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF INCISIVE FORAMEN ACCORDING TO AGE, GENDER AND EDENTULOUS STATUS

Yıl 2024, , 287 - 290, 15.10.2024

Yunus Yiğit Saka , Samed Şatır , Tansu Çimen

https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1416381

Öz

Objective: Evaluation of the change in incisive foramen (IF) diameter and localization according to age, gender, edentulous status and other anatomical landmarks by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Method: 162 patients (81 females, 81 males, mean age 41.1+_15.2) were included in the study. IF diameter, distance between IF and the greater palatine foramen (GPF) and distance between IF and the most posterior of the median palatine bone (PNS: posterior nasal spine) were measured. The measurement values of the patients were compared with the Independent t-test according to gender and dental status. The relationship between age and measurements was examined with the Pearson correlation test.
Results: The mean IF diameter of the patients was 3.78±0.95 mm. The mean IF diameter (P.<001), the distance between the right GPF and the IF (P.=023) and the distance between the IF and the PNS (P.=039) of the dentate patients were found to be significantly lower than the edentulous patients.
Conclusion: The IF diameter and the IF - GPF distance were found to be lower in dentulous patients than in edentulous patients. It was determined that the IF diameter and the IF - GPF distance increased with age.
Keywords: Incisive foramen, greater palatine foramen, CBCT

Anahtar Kelimeler

Incisive foramen, greater palatine foramen, CBCT

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was received from Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University

Destekleyen Kurum

None

Proje Numarası

None

İNSİZİV FORAMENİN YAŞ, CİNSİYET VE DİŞSİZLİK DURUMUNA GÖRE MORFOLOJİK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz

Amaç: İnsiziv foramen (İF) çap ve lokalizasyonunun yaş, cinsiyet, dişsizlik durumu ve diğer anatomik landmarklara göre değişiminin konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) ile değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 162 hasta (81 kadın, 81 erkek, yaş ort. 41,1±15,2) dahil edildi. İF çapı, İF ile palatinum majus mesafesi ve İF ile palatinanın posterioru arasındaki mesafe ölçüldü. Cinsiyet ve diş durumuna göre hastaların ölçüm değerleri Independent t-test ile karşılaştırıldı. Yaş ile ölçümler arasındaki ilişki Pearson korelasyon test ile incelendi.
Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama İF çapı 3,78±0,95 mm idi. Dişli hastaların ortalama İF çapı (p<0,001), sağ palatinum majus ile İF mesafesi (p=0,023) ve palatinanın en posterioru ile İF mesafesi (p=0,039) dişsiz hastalara göre anlamlı düzeyde düşük saptandı.
Sonuç: Dişli hastalarda İF çapı ve İF ile palatinum majus mesafesi dişsiz hastalara göre daha düşük bulundu. İF çapının ve İF - palatinum majus mesafesinin yaşla birlikte arttığı belirlendi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnsiziv foramen, Foramen palatinum majus, KIBT

Proje Numarası

None

Kaynakça

• 1. Hakbilen S, Mağat G. Nazopalatin kanal ve klinik önemi: Derleme. Selcuk Dent J 2019;6(1):91-97. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.348841.
• 2. Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, et al. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagnostic Inter Imaging. 2016;97(11):1165-1172. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.012.
• 3. Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, Von Arx T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2010;22(3):295-301. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02010.x.
• 4. Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, et al. Macro‐ and micro‐anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(7):598-603. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01429.x.
• 5. Kim YT, Lee JH, Jeong SN. Three-dimensional observations of the incisive foramen on cone-beam computed tomography image analysis. J Periodont Implant Sci. 2020;50(1):48. doi:10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.48.
• 6. Soumya P, Koppolu P, Pathakota KR, Chappidi V. Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Radiol Res Practic. 2019;2019:1-5. doi:10.1155/2019/6151253.
• 7. Neto ISA, Cruz WHS, De Castro Ribeiro I, et al. Morphometric study of incisive canal and its anatomic variations in brazilian individuals. CRANIO®. 2021;42(1):94-101. doi:10.1080/08869634.2021.1887610.
• 8. Wu B, Li H, Fan Y, et al. Clinical and anatomical study of foramen locations in jaw bones and adjacent structures. Medicine. 2020;99(2):e18069. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000018069.
• 9. Sarna K, Estreed MA, Sonigra KJ, et al. Anatomical Patterns of the Nasopalatine Canal and Incisive Foramen in an African Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study. Craniomaxillofac Trau Reconstruct. 2022;16(3):222-233. doi:10.1177/19433875221100943.
• 10. Panda M, Shankar T, Raut A, Dev S, Kar A, Hota S. Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants. J Indian Prosthod Soc. 2018;18(4):356. doi:10.4103/jips.jips_167_18.
• 11. Mardinger O, Namani‐Sadan N, Chaushu G, Schwartz‐Arad D. Morphologic Changes of the Nasopalatine Canal Related to Dental Implantation: A Radiologic Study in Different Degrees of Absorbed Maxillae. J Periodontol. 2008;79(9):1659-1662. doi:10.1902/jop.2008.080043.
• 12. Gibelli D, Borlando A, Dolci C, Pucciarelli V, Cattaneo C, Sforza C. Anatomical characteristics of greater palatine foramen: a novel point of view. Surg Radiol Anatomy. 2017;39(12):1359-1368. doi:10.1007/s00276-017-1899-7.
• 13. Tomaszewska IM, Tomaszewski KA, Kmiotek EK, et al. Anatomical landmarks for the localization of the greater palatine foramen--a study of 1200 head CTs, 150 dry skulls, systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. J Anatomy. 2014;225(4):419-435. doi:10.1111/joa.12221.
• 14. Aoun G, Nasseh I, Sokhn S, Saadeh M. Analysis of the greater palatine foramen in a Lebanese population using cone-beam computed tomography technology. J Int Soc Prevent Community Dent. 2015;5(8):82. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.171594.