Effect of Different Beverages and Polishing Systems on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of a Smart Chromatic Composite Resin and Methacrylate Composites

Yıl 2025, , 41 - 47, 20.01.2025

Semiha Ekrikaya Özcan Karataş

https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1618999

Öz

Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the color stability and surface roughness of smart chromatic composite resin and methacrylate composite resins with applying different polishing systems and stored in different solutions.
Methods: In the study, 120 disc-shaped specimens were prepared from a smart chromatic composite, a nanofill composite, and a nanohybrid composite. The specimens were separated into 12 groups with a specimen size of 10, and the two different polishing systems were utilized. The initial color values of the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer and the surface roughness values were measured with a profilometer. Then, the specimens were stored in two different beverage solutions, and color and roughness measurements were repeated. The mean color change values of the specimens were calculated in ΔE, and the surface roughness values were recorded in Ra. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (P =.05).
Results: Statistically significant variations were observed in the mean color change values among the groups, as a consequence of the utilization of various polishing systems and exposure to different solutions (P.05). Although no significant variations were observed in the mean surface roughness values of the specimens due to exposure to different solutions (P >.05), significant distinctions were identified among the groups to which different polishing systems were employed (P <.05).
Conclusion: The application of different polishing systems and exposure to various solutions can result in variations in color and surface roughness values for composite resins, owing to their inherent structural characteristics.
Keywords: Color Change, Composite Resin, Profilometer, Smart Chromatic Composite, Surface Roughness

Anahtar Kelimeler

Color Change, Composite Resin, Profilometer, Smart Chromatic Composite

Kaynakça

• 1. Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art - Is it disruptive or destructive? Dent Mater. 2020; 36(1): 9-24. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.103
• 2. van de Sande FH, Moraes RR, Elias RV, et al. Is composite repair suitable for anterior restorations? A long-term practice-based clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23(6): 2795-2803. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2722-5
• 3. Crins L, Opdam NJM, Kreulen CM, et al. Randomized controlled trial on the performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in patients with severe tooth wear. Dent Mater. 2021; 37(11): 1645-1654. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.018
• 4. de Abreu JLB, Sampaio CS, Benalcazar Jalkh EB, Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33(2): 269-276. doi:10.1111/jerd.12659
• 5. Kanzow P, Krois J, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F. Long-term treatment costs and cost-effectiveness of restoration repair versus replacement. Dent Mater. 2021; 37(6): e375-e381. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2021.02.008
• 6. Frese C, Wohlrab T, Soliman S, et al. A Multicenter Trial on the Long-term Performance of Direct Composite Buildups in the Anterior Dentition - Survival and Quality Outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22(6): 573-580. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a45514
• 7. Schmidlin PR, Filli T, Imfeld C, Tepper S, Attin T. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series. Oper Dent. 2009;34(1):102-108. doi:10.2341/08-11
• 8. Schneider LFJ, Ribeiro RB, Liberato WF, Salgado VE, Moraes RR, Cavalcante LM. Curing potential and color stability of different resin-based luting materials. Dent Mater. 2020; 36(10): e309-e315. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.07.003
• 9. Bagheri R, Burrow M, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005; 33(5): 389-398.
• 10. St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crépeau H, Vargas M. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Operative Dent. 2019;44(3):E122-E132.
• 11. Lowe RA. OMNICHROMA: One Composite That Covers All Shades for an Anterior Tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2019; 40(suppl 1): 8-10.
• 12. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater. 2004; 20(6): 530-534. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2002.11.001
• 13. Rajkumar K, Kumar S, Mahalaxmi S, Ragavi P, Mageshwaran T. Colour stability of resin composites after emersing in coffee of different temperature-an in vitro study. SRM Univ J Dent Sci. 2011; 2(2): 92-95.
• 14. Ardu S, Rossier I, di Bella E, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Resin composite thickness' influence on L*a*b* coordinates and translucency. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23(4): 1583-1586. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2585-9
• 15. Lee YK, Yu B, Lee SH, Cho MS, Lee CY, Lim HN. Shade compatibility of esthetic restorative materials--A review. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(12): 1119-1126. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.004
• 16. Kuzu T, Karatas O. The effects of mouthwashes and antiseptics on color stability of different composite resin. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2021; 31(1): 71-76. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.806587
• 17. Stober T, Gilde H, Lenz P. Color stability of highly filled composite resin materials for facings. Dent Mater. 2001; 17(1): 87-94. doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00065-8
• 18. Meenakshi CM, Sirisha K. Surface quality and color stability of posterior composites in acidic beverages. J Conserv Dent. 2020; 23(1): 57-61. doi:10.4103/JCD.JCD_291_19
• 19. El Gezawi M, Kaisarly D, Al-Saleh H, ArRejaie A, Al-Harbi F, Kunzelmann KH. Degradation Potential of Bulk Versus Incrementally Applied and Indirect Composites: Color, Microhardness, and Surface Deterioration. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(6): e195-e208. doi:10.2341/15-195-L
• 20. Miotti LL, Nicoloso GF, Durand LB, Susin AH, Rocha RO. Color stability of a resin composite: Effect of the immersion method and surface treatments. Indian J Dent Res. 2016; 27(2): 195-199. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.183137
• 21. Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Khurshid Z. Smart Monochromatic Composite: A Literature Review. Int J Dent. 2022; 2022: 2445394. doi:10.1155/2022/2445394
• 22. Aydın N, Karaoglanoglu S, Oktay EA, Ersoz B. Investigation of Single Shade Composite Resin Surface Roughness and Color Stability. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2021; 31(2): 207-214.
• 23. Karatas O, Gul P, Akgul N, et al. Effect of staining and bleaching on the microhardness, surface roughness and color of different composite resins. Dent Med Probl. 2021; 58(3): 369-376. doi:10.17219/dmp/131022
• 24. Heintze S, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dental Materials. 2010; 26(4): 306-319.
• 25. Gaviria-Martinez A, Castro-Ramirez L, Ladera-Castaneda M, et al. Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 26 2022; 22(1): 258. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w
• 26. Ertas E, Guler AU, Yucel AC, Koprulu H, Guler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25(2): 371-376.
• 27. Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23(1): 34-43. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00376.x
• 28. Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016; 28(4): 247-261. doi:10.1111/jerd.12215
• 29. Moda MD, Godas AGL, Fernandes JC, et al. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018; 9(1). doi:10.1111/jicd.12287
• 30. Aydın N, Karaoglanoglu S, Kılıçarslan M. Effect of Wet and Dry Polishing Conditions by Two Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Color Changes of Two Composite Resin Restoratives: An In Vitro Comparative Study. J Adv Oral Res. 2022; 13(1): 127-134. doi:10.1177/23202068221084448
• 31. Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu A, Garcia-Godoy F, Brambilla E. Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: A review of the current literature. Am J Dent. Dec 2015; 28(6): 311-320.
• 32. Gomleksiz S, Gomleksiz O. The effect of contemporary finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of bulk fill resin composite and nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022; 34(6): 915-923. doi:10.1111/jerd.12874
• 33. Degirmenci A, Pehlivan IE, Degirmenci BU. Effects of polishing procedures on optical parameters and surface roughness of composite resins with different viscosities. Dent Mater J. 2023; 30: 199-210. doi:10.4012/dmj.2022-178