Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3, 148 - 152, 31.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.5152/CRDS.2023.22141

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Desai H MS. Basic concepts of finite element analysis and its applica- tions in dentistry: an overview. Oral Hyg Health. 2014;2(5). [CrossRef]
  • 2. Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):346-355. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, de Melo RM, Borges ALS, Bottino MA, Özcan M. Short communication: influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of posterior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: 3D finite element analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;96:279-284. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Chang Y, Tambe AA, Maeda Y, Wada M, Gonda T. Finite element analy- sis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):7. [CrossRef] 5. Tsouknidas A, Karaoglani E, Michailidis N, Kugiumtzis D, Pissiotis A, Michalakis K. Influence of preparation depth and design on stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored with ceramic veneers: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):151-160. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Bakitian F, Papia E, Larsson C, Vult von Steyern P. Evaluation of stress distribution in tooth‐supported fixed dental prostheses made of translucent zirconia with variations in framework designs: a three‐ dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(4):315-322. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Razaghi R, Biglari H, Karimi A. Dynamic finite element simulation of dental prostheses during chewing using muscle equivalent force and trajectory approaches. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41(4):314-324. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Lorusso F, Inchingolo F, Scarano A. Scientific production in dentistry: the national panorama through a bibliometric study of Italian acad- emies. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:3468303. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Hicks D, Melkers J. Bibliometrics as a tool for research evaluation. In: Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013:323-349. [CrossRef]
  • 10. ULAKBİM. Tr Dizin. Available at: https://trdizin.gov.tr/en/about/. Accessed November 21, 2022.
  • 11. Carlsson GE, Omar R. Trends in prosthodontics. Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(3):167-179. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Çelik E, Özden AN. Dinamik Yükleme yapılan kısa İmplantlarda Kron/ implant Oranının stres Dağılımına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2017;6(3):324-334. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Leblebi̇Ci̇Oğlu İ, Esi̇ ME, Kiliç D, Kiliç K. ‘All-On-Four’, ‘All-On-Five’ ve ‘all-On-Six’ konsepti Kullanılarak Üretilen Protezlerin stres Dağılımının sonlu elemanlar analiz Yöntemi Ile İncelenmesi. Selcuk Dent J. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Akay C, Karakış D, Yaluğ S. Premaksilla Ile tek Taraflı Maksiller Defektli Rezeksiyon Obturatörlerinin üç Boyutlu sonlu elemanlar stres analiz Yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Univ Diş Hekim Fak Derg. 2015;24(3). [CrossRef]
  • 15. Egilmez F, Nalbant L. Comparison of the effect of thermal stresses on tooth-colored posts, cores and tooth structures by finite element analysis. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2012;15(2):118-129. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Deste G, Durkan R. Tam Kontür Zirkonya Restorasyonların farklı all on four mandibular implant Modellerinde Biyomekanik Davranışları: 3 Boyutlu sonlu elemanlar stres analizi çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;29. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Tuzlali M, Öztürk C, Zortuk M. Comparison the stress distribution of screw retained and cemented implant supported fixed restorations: finite element analysis study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2018;24(2):106-113. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Onat H, Altan A, Göztaş Z. Atatürk üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi dergisi’nin bibliyometrik analizi. Atatürk Univ Diş Hekim Fak Derg. 2015;25(1). [CrossRef]
  • 19. Department of Orthodontics, Mustafa Kemal University School of Dentistry, Hatay, Turkey, Bilgic F, Kucuk EB, et al. Analysis of six ortho- dontic journals in Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Turk J Orthod. 2018;31(3):73-78. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to con- duct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285-296. [CrossRef]

Bibliometric Analysis of the Prosthodontic Studies Used Finite Element Analysis in TR Index

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3, 148 - 152, 31.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.5152/CRDS.2023.22141

Öz

Objective: Finite element stress analysis is a method in which stress formation on tissues and materials of any structure and shape can be analyzed. In this study, it is aimed to make a biblio- metric analysis of studies in prosthetic dentistry using finite element stress analysis in TR Index.
Materials and Methods: Articles were obtained by searching the “finite element” keyword in the TR Index. Dentistry journals were filtered and studies were reduced to the field of dentistry. The publications were classified and recorded to include the journal name, publication year, author institutions, departments, article type, article language, and number of citations. Publications in the field of prosthetic dentistry were included in this study. Frequency analysis of the data, desc- riptive statistics and Mann–Whitney U test were performed (α = 0.05).
Results: Twenty-seven studies, including 2 reviews and 25 research articles, were reached. It was seen that the most publications were in the Journal of Dental Faculty of Atatürk University and Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Post core restorations, all-ceramic crowns, maxillofacial prostheses, and implant-sup- ported prostheses were the subject of the studies, 13 of which were in Turkish and 14 in English.
Conclusion: Finite element stress analysis is a preferred method in prosthetic dentistry studies. The field of implantology stands out in this sense. National studies using this method have shown a significant increase in the last decade. The language had no significant effect on the number of citations of the publications.
Keywords: Bibliometrics, prosthodontics, finite element analysis, dentistry, database

Kaynakça

  • 1. Desai H MS. Basic concepts of finite element analysis and its applica- tions in dentistry: an overview. Oral Hyg Health. 2014;2(5). [CrossRef]
  • 2. Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):346-355. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, de Melo RM, Borges ALS, Bottino MA, Özcan M. Short communication: influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of posterior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: 3D finite element analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;96:279-284. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Chang Y, Tambe AA, Maeda Y, Wada M, Gonda T. Finite element analy- sis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):7. [CrossRef] 5. Tsouknidas A, Karaoglani E, Michailidis N, Kugiumtzis D, Pissiotis A, Michalakis K. Influence of preparation depth and design on stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored with ceramic veneers: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):151-160. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Bakitian F, Papia E, Larsson C, Vult von Steyern P. Evaluation of stress distribution in tooth‐supported fixed dental prostheses made of translucent zirconia with variations in framework designs: a three‐ dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(4):315-322. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Razaghi R, Biglari H, Karimi A. Dynamic finite element simulation of dental prostheses during chewing using muscle equivalent force and trajectory approaches. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41(4):314-324. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Lorusso F, Inchingolo F, Scarano A. Scientific production in dentistry: the national panorama through a bibliometric study of Italian acad- emies. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:3468303. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Hicks D, Melkers J. Bibliometrics as a tool for research evaluation. In: Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013:323-349. [CrossRef]
  • 10. ULAKBİM. Tr Dizin. Available at: https://trdizin.gov.tr/en/about/. Accessed November 21, 2022.
  • 11. Carlsson GE, Omar R. Trends in prosthodontics. Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(3):167-179. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Çelik E, Özden AN. Dinamik Yükleme yapılan kısa İmplantlarda Kron/ implant Oranının stres Dağılımına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2017;6(3):324-334. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Leblebi̇Ci̇Oğlu İ, Esi̇ ME, Kiliç D, Kiliç K. ‘All-On-Four’, ‘All-On-Five’ ve ‘all-On-Six’ konsepti Kullanılarak Üretilen Protezlerin stres Dağılımının sonlu elemanlar analiz Yöntemi Ile İncelenmesi. Selcuk Dent J. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Akay C, Karakış D, Yaluğ S. Premaksilla Ile tek Taraflı Maksiller Defektli Rezeksiyon Obturatörlerinin üç Boyutlu sonlu elemanlar stres analiz Yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Univ Diş Hekim Fak Derg. 2015;24(3). [CrossRef]
  • 15. Egilmez F, Nalbant L. Comparison of the effect of thermal stresses on tooth-colored posts, cores and tooth structures by finite element analysis. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2012;15(2):118-129. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Deste G, Durkan R. Tam Kontür Zirkonya Restorasyonların farklı all on four mandibular implant Modellerinde Biyomekanik Davranışları: 3 Boyutlu sonlu elemanlar stres analizi çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;29. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Tuzlali M, Öztürk C, Zortuk M. Comparison the stress distribution of screw retained and cemented implant supported fixed restorations: finite element analysis study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2018;24(2):106-113. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Onat H, Altan A, Göztaş Z. Atatürk üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi dergisi’nin bibliyometrik analizi. Atatürk Univ Diş Hekim Fak Derg. 2015;25(1). [CrossRef]
  • 19. Department of Orthodontics, Mustafa Kemal University School of Dentistry, Hatay, Turkey, Bilgic F, Kucuk EB, et al. Analysis of six ortho- dontic journals in Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Turk J Orthod. 2018;31(3):73-78. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to con- duct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285-296. [CrossRef]
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Diş Hekimliği (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Merve Utar Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA Utar M. Bibliometric Analysis of the Prosthodontic Studies Used Finite Element Analysis in TR Index. Curr Res Dent Sci. Temmuz 2023;33(3):148-152. doi:10.5152/CRDS.2023.22141

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

29936