Radiologic Changes in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Hypermobility: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2, 99 - 102, 15.04.2024

Songül Cömert Kiliç Nihat Kiliç M. Akif Sümbüllü

https://doi.org/10.5152/CRDS.2023.2273121

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate radiologic changes in patients with temporomandibular joint hypermobility using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Methods: This retrospective study included the first-visit CBCT images of 41 patients (mean age, 32.83 ± 13.63 years) treated for TMJ hypermobility. CBCT images of sixty-eight joints with TMJ hypermobility taken by using NewTom 3G were evaluated. Condylar erosion, sclerosis, hypoplasia, and flattening were assessed on the CBCT images. In addition, flattening of articular eminence, subchondral cyst, and pneumatization were also evaluated in the images. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on the data.
Results: Degenerations were observed in 47 joints (%69.11). Condylar erosion was the most common finding of TMJ hypermobility (43 of 68 joints, 63.2%). Other frequent condylar bony changes were condylar osteophyte (32 joints, 47.1%), sclerosis (8 joints, 11.8%), hypoplasia (8 joints, 11.8%), and flattening (6 joints, 8.8%). The flattening of articular eminence (3 joints, 4.4%) and subchondral cyst (3 joints, 4.4%)), and) were other findings on CBCT images. One joint showed a bifid condyle and pneumatization (1.5 %) (Table 1).
Conclusion: The present study showed that two of three patients with TMJ hypermobility had joint degenerations. Condylar erosion and osteophyte are the most common degenerations observed in these patients. Therefore, CBCT is recommended for the diagnosis and management of TMJ hypermobility.
Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography, TMJ hypermobility, Diagnosis
Temporomandibular Eklem Hipermobilitesi Olan Hastalarda Radyolojik Değişiklikler: Koni Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Çalışması
ÖZ
Amaç : Bu çalışmada temporomandibular eklem hipermobilitesi olan hastalarda Koni Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (CBCT) kullanılarak radyolojik değişikliklerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı.
Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya, TME hipermobilitesi nedeniyle tedavi edilen 41 hastanın (ortalama yaş, 32,83 ± 13,63 yıl) ilk ziyaret KIBT görüntüleri dahil edildi. TME hipermobilitesi olan 68 eklemin NewTom 3G kullanılarak alınan KIBT görüntüleri değerlendirildi. KIBT görüntülerinde kondiler erozyon, skleroz, hipoplazi ve düzleşme değerlendirildi. Ayrıca görüntülerde eklem eminensinde düzleşme, subkondral kist ve pnömatizasyon da değerlendirildi. Veriler üzerinde tanımlayıcı istatistiksel analiz yapıldı.
Bulgular : 47 eklemde (%69,11) dejenerasyon gözlendi. Kondiler erozyon, TME hipermobilitesinin en sık görülen bulgusuydu (68 eklemden 43'ü, %63,2). Kondiler osteofit (32 eklem, %47,1), skleroz (8 eklem, %11,8), hipoplazi (8 eklem, %11,8) ve düzleşme (6 eklem, %8,8) diğer sık görülen kondiler kemik değişiklikleriydi. Artiküler eminenste düzleşme (3 eklem, %4,4) ve subkondral kist (3 eklem, %4,4) ve) KIBT görüntülerindeki diğer bulgulardı. Bir eklemde bifid kondil ve pnömatizasyon (%1,5) görüldü (Tablo 1).
Sonuç: Bu çalışma TME hipermobilitesi olan üç hastadan ikisinde eklem dejenerasyonunun olduğunu gösterdi. Bu hastalarda en sık görülen dejenerasyonlar kondiler erozyon ve osteofittir. Bu nedenle TME hipermobilitesinin tanı ve tedavisinde KIBT önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler : Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, TME hipermobilitesi, Tanı

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cone beam computed tomography, TMJ hypermobility, Diagnosis

Kaynakça

• 1. Abrahamsson H, Eriksson L, Abrahamsson P, Häggman-Henrikson B. Treatment of temporomandibular joint luxation: a systematic literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(1):61-70.
• 2. Okeson JP. Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders. In: Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 8th edition. Elsevier, St. Louis, 2020. pp. 132-173
• 3. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP: Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6-27.
• 4. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(4): 219-26.
• 5. Cömert Kilic S, Kilic N, Sümbüllü MA. Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: cone beam computed tomography findings, clinical features, and correlations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(10):1268-1274.
• 6. Berry K, Padilla M, Mitrirattanakul S, Enciso R. Temporomandibular joint findings in CBCT images: A retrospective study. Cranio. 2021 Dec 11:1-6. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2021.2015102.
• 7. Fan PD, Xiong X, Cheng QY, Xiang J, Zhou XM, Yi YT, Wang J. Risk estimation of degenerative joint disease in temporomandibular disorder patients with different types of sagittal and coronal disc displacements: MRI and CBCT analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Jan;50(1):12-23.
• 8. Tuijt M, Parsa A, Koutris M, Berkhout E, Koolstra JH, Lobbezoo F. Human jaw joint hypermobility: Diagnosis and biomechanical modelling. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(10):783-789.
• 9. Cömert Kilic S, Güngörmüş M. Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to placebo for treatment of TMJ hypermobility: Comparison of pain changes at masseter, lateral pterygoid, sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2022; 32(3): 226-230.
• 10. Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(4):429-438.
• 11. Katakami K, Shimoda S, Kobayashi K, Kawasaki K. Histological investigation of osseous changes of mandibular condyles with backscattered electron images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37(6):330-339.
• 12. Marques AP, Perrella A, Arita ES, Pereira MF, Cavalcanti Mde G. Assessment of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions by cone beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(4):467-474.
• 13. Patel A, Tee BC, Fields H, Jones E, Chaudhry J, Sun Z. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145(2):143-156.
• 14. Lee YH, Lee KM, Kim T, Hong JP. Psychological Factors that Influence Decision-Making Regarding Trauma-Related Pain in Adolescents with Temporomandibular Disorder. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18728.
• 15. Chen J, Sorensen KP, Gupta T, Kilts T, Young M, Wadhwa S. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009: 17(3):354-361.
• 16. Talaat W, Al Bayatti S, Al Kawas S. CBCT analysis of bony changes associated with temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2016;34(2):88-94.
• 17. Wiberg B, Wanman A. Signs of osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joints in young patients: a clinical and radiographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998:86(2):158-164.
• 18. Ogütcen-Toller M. Sound analysis of temporomandibular joint internal derangements with phonographic recordings. J Prosthet Dent. 2003:89(3):311-318.
• 19. Honda K, Natsumi Y, Urade M. Correlation between MRI evidence of degenerative condylar surface changes, induction of articular disc displacement and pathological joint sounds in the temporomandibular joint. Gerodontology. 2008:25(4): 251-257.