Correlation of Dentolabial and Facial Analyses with Aesthetic Perception

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3, 166 - 172, 28.07.2024

Zeynep Aydin Ayşegül Köroğlu Onur Şahin

https://doi.org/10.5152/CRDS.2022.223772

Öz

Objective: : It may be necessary to systematically apply objective, measurable and repeatable rules for physicians to provide an aesthetic smile in patients and for evaluations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the consistency of the aesthetic perception of physicians with the results of objective dentolabial and facial analyses and the state of being affected by professional experience.
Methods: In the current study 4 prosthodontists, 4 research assistants and 4 intern dentists were determined as observer and they were asked to evaluate the full face and smile photographs taken from 100 volunteers in the context of 6 criteria for aesthetics. The relevant photographs were analyzed objectively in digital environment, taking into account the values determined as reference with the support of the literature. Statistically, the comparisons between subjective results of the observers and the objective reference values were determined with Cohen's Kappa test; consistency between observers were with Fleiss Kappa statistic; the comparisons of facial and dentolabial esthetic perceptions were made by Chi-square test.
Results: The results obtained by the subjective perceptions of all observers and the objective results of computer measurements were not completely compatible with each other statistically, but a great deal of agreement was achieved. The harmony of aesthetic perception with objective results was not affected by increasing professional experience and no difference was observed between the observer groups.
Conclusion: Examining not only the mouth but also the whole face analysis results in aesthetic evaluations has the potential to positively affect the success of the treatment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental esthetics, dentists, face, perception, smile

Kaynakça

• 1. Frush JP, Fisher RD. Introduction to dentogenic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1955;5(5):586-90.
• 2. Beiser FC. Diotima's Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
• 3. Lucker GW, Graber LW, Pietromonaco P. The importance of dentofacial appearance in facial esthetics: A signal detection approach. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1981;2(4):261-74.
• 4. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(5):759-65.
• 5. Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol. 2000 1996;11:18-28.
• 6. Gill DS, Naini FB, Tredwin CJ. Smile aesthetics. Dent Update. 2007;34(3):157-8.
• 7. Mack MR. Vertical dimension: a dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(4):478-85.
• 8. Chiche G, Pinault A. Artistic and scientific principles applied to esthetic dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.;1994.
• 9. Levine JB, Finkel S. Esthetic Diagnosis: A Three-Step Analysis. Levine JB, editor. Esthetic Dentistry: Smile Design Integrating Esthetics and Function. Mosby Ltd; 2016.
• 10. Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists' preferences of anterior tooth proportion a web‐based study. J Prosthodont. 2000;9(3):123-36.
• 11. Goldstein RE, Chu SJ, Lee EA, Stappert CF, Ronald E. Goldstein's Esthetics in Dentistry. 3rd edition. USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018.
• 12. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(1):24-8.
• 13. Rifkin R. Facial analysis: a comprehensive approach to treatment planning in aesthetic dentistry . Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000;12(9):865-71.
• 14. Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(6):530-8.
• 15. Esper LA, Sbrana MC, da Silva Cunha MJ, Moreira GS, de Almeida ALPF. Esthetic composition of smile in individuals with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate: visibility of the periodontium and the esthetics of smile. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012: 563734.
• 16. Chetan P, Tandon P, Singh GK, Nagar A, Prasad V, Chugh VK. Dynamics of a smile in different age groups. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(1):90-6.
• 17. Shafiee R, Korn EL, Pearson H, Boyd RL, Baumrind S. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2008;133(4):500-8.
• 18. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2008;133(4):515-23.
• 19. Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment. Dent Update. 2008;35(3):159-70.
• 20. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29(4):358-82.
• 21. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning—part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 1993;103(5):395-411.
• 22. Sarver D, Jacobson RS. The aesthetic dentofacial analysis. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34(3):369-94.
• 23. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4(3):146-52.
• 24. Silva BP, Jimenez-Castellanos E, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons' perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(6):e162-71.
• 25. Kokich Jr VO, Asuman Kiyak H, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):311-24.
• 26. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod. 2004;31(3):204-9.
• 27. Afroz S, Rathi S, Rajput G, Rahman SA. Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: A campus based survey of North Indian University students. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(4):455-60.
• 28. Kang JM, Kang KH. Effect of malocclusion or orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life in adults. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(6):304-11.
• 29. Ekrem O, Yavuz İ, Yildiz O. Gülümseme Estetiğinin Değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Univ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018; 28(4):583-91.
• 30. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006;76(4):557-63.
• 31. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(6):748-53.
• 32. Chotimah C, Utomo SH, Purbiati M. Differences between Male and Female Adolescents in the Smile Aesthetics Perceptions Regarding Smile Arc, Gingival Display, and Buccal Corridor. J Int Med Res. 2017;10:481-5.
• 33. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(2):141-51.
• 34. Allen EP. Use of mucogingival surgical procedures to enhance esthetics. Dent Clin North Am. 1988;32(2):307-30.