TÜKETİCİLERİN ABARTILI REFERANS FİYATA YÖNELİK ALGILARININ MARKALI KOT PANTOLON SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞI AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2019, , 286 - 293, 15.10.2019

Serap Çabuk , Ayşe Şahin , Kalender Özcan Atılgan

https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.570965

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu
çalışmada, markalı kot pantolon satın alan tüketicilerin üç farklı referans
fiyat durumu için (referans fiyat olmayan, makul referans fiyatlı ve abartılı
referans fiyatlı), referans fiyatlara yönelik inandırıcılık, işlem değeri,
algılanan kalite ve satın alma istekliliği değişkenleri açısından farklılıklar
incelenmiştir. Mersin il merkezinde kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle 515
katılımcıdan anket verileri elde edilmiştir.     Marka
aşinalığının kovaryans olarak ele alındığı çok değişkenli kovaryans analizi
(MANCOVA) ile üç farklı referans fiyat durumunu oluşturan gruplar arasındaki
farklılıklar test edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonunda, referans fiyatların
inandırıcılığının algılanması ve satın alma istekliliği bağlamında
farklılıkların olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Abartılı referans fiyat, tüketici algısı

Kaynakça

• Alford, B. L. & Biswas, A. (2002). The effects of discount level, price consciousness and sale proneness on consumers’ price perception and behavioral intention. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 775-783.
• American Marketing Association-Marketing Power, (AMA) (2010). Dictionary, Erişim Tarihi: 22 Aralık 2010, http://www.marketingpower.com/_layouts/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=R.
• Atılgan, K. Ö. (2015). Pazarlamada Fiyat Davranışsal Bir Yaklaşım, Akademisyen Kitabevi.
• Berkowitz, E. N. & Walton, J. R. (1980). Contextual influences on consumer price responses: an experimental analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 349-358.
• Biswas, A. (1992), “The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Reference Price Perceptions,” Journal of Business Research, 25 (3), 251-262.
• Biswas, A. and Blair, E. A. (1991), “Contextual Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (3), 1-12.
• Compeau, L. D., Dhruv G., and Chandrashekaran, R. (2002), “Comparative Price Advertising: Believe It or Not,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36 (2), 284-294.
• Della B. A. J., Monroe, K. B., & McGinnis, J. M. (1981). Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 416-427.
• Dodds, William B. and Monroe, K. B. (1985), “The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 2, E.C. Hirschman and M.B. Holbrook, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 85-90.
• Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B. and Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Aug., 1991), pp. 307-319.
• Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B. and Krishnan, R. (1998), The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers' Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 46-59.
• Helson, H. (1964), Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
• Kalyanaram, G., & Winer, R. S. (1995). Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing science, 14(3_supplement), G161-G169.
• Krishnan, B. C., Dutta, S., & Jha, S. (2013). Effectiveness of exaggerated advertised reference prices: the role of decision time pressure. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 105-113.
• Lowengart, O. (2002). Reference price conceptualisations: An integrative framework of analysis. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(1-2), 145-171.
• Monroe, K. B. (1990). (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, USA: Mcgraw-Hill.
• Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of consumer research, 8(2), 223-230.
• Rajendran, K. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and temporal components of reference price. The Journal of Marketing, 22-34.
• Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change.
• Suter, T. A., & Burton, S. (1996). Believability and consumer perceptions of implausible reference prices in retail advertisements. Psychology & Marketing, 13(1), 37-54.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
• Thaler, Richard 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4:199-214.
• Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., & Weilbaker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search. Journal of Consumer research, 15(1), 95-110.
• Winer, R. S. (1986). A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. Journal of consumer research, 13(2), 250-256.
• Wolk, A. and Spann, M. (2008). The Effects Of Reference Prices on Bidding Behavior in Interactive Pricing Mechanisms, Journal Of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 2-18.