HOW CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES PREDICT THE ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND JOB SATISFACTION? A CROSS SECTIOANAL STUDY

Yıl 2020, , 325 - 338, 20.04.2020

Mehmet Biçer

https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.593071

Öz

ABSTRACT

The main purpose of this study is to explore the
effects of conflict management styles such as integrating, compromising,
avoiding, dominating, obliging on organizational trust and job satisfaction of
white-collar workers. In accordance with this purpose, data were collected from
171 participants working in 11 companies which are mainly operating in finance,
manufacturing, logistics, iron and steel, food sectors in İskenderun and Adana
in Turkey. The correlation analysis results of the research revealed that
conflict management styles have statistically significant relationships with
organizational trust and job satisfaction. Results indicated that integrating,
obliging, compromising have statistically significant and positive relations with
organizational trust. Furthermore,
regression analysis results revealed that integrating, obliging and avoiding
have positive effects on job satisfaction whereas compromising and dominating have
negative effects. Another important finding of the research is that
organizational trust has a positive effect on job satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conflict management styles, Organizational trust, Job satisfaction

HOW CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES PREDICT THE ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND JOB SATISFACTION? A CROSS SECTIOANAL STUDY

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to explore the effects of conflict management styles such as integrating, compromising, avoiding, dominating, obliging on organizational trust and job satisfaction of white-collar workers. In accordance with this purpose, data were collected from 171 participants working in 11 companies which are mainly operating in finance, manufacturing, logistics, iron and steel, food sectors in İskenderun and Adana in Turkey. The correlation analysis results of the research revealed that conflict management styles have statistically significant relationships with organizational trust and job satisfaction. Results indicated that integrating, obliging, compromising have statistically significant and positive relations with organizational trust. Furthermore, regression analysis results revealed that integrating, obliging and avoiding have positive effects on job satisfaction whereas compromising and dominating have negative effects. Another important finding of the research is that organizational trust has a positive effect on job satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conflict Management Styles, Organizational Trust, Job Satisfaction

Kaynakça

• Altıntaş, T. (2007). İş doyumu ve çatışma çözme stillerini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi. Master’s Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Arnold, K. A., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership & Organizational Development, 22(7), 315-20.
• Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid: Key orientations for achieving production through people. Houston, TX: Gulf
• Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. (1996). Transaction costs in organizations with trust. In: Bies R., Lewicki R., & Sheppard B., eds. Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Greenwich.
• Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.
• Chan, K. W., Huang, X., & Ng, P. M. (2008). Managers’ conflict management styles and employee attitudinal outcomes: The mediating role of trust. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 277-295.
• Choi, Y. (2013).The influence of conflict management culture on job satisfaction. Social Behavior And Personality, 41(4), 687-692.
• Cranny, C. J., Smith, P. C., & Stone, E. F. (1992). Job satisfaction: how people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. New York: Lexington Press.Cunningham, J. B., & Macgregor, J. N. (2000). Trust and the design of work complementary constructs in satisfaction and performance. Human Relations, 53(12), 1575-1591.
• Demireli, C., & Munzur, Ç. (2012). Personelin çatışma yönetimi algıları ve iş doyumu düzeylerinin incelenmesi: Mersin Gençlik Hizmetleri Ve Spor İl Müdürlüğü Örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 34, 295-309.
• Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129-151.
• Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as a predictor of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 44-56. doi: 10.2307/255661
• Elma, C. (1998). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin çatışmayı yönetme yeterlikleri. Master’s Thesis, Ankara University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.
• Eren, E. (2000). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Fritchie R., (1995). Conflict and its management. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 53(9), 471-473.
• Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L. (1998). An examination of organization trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27, 321-338.
• Güçer, E., & Demirdağ, Ş. A. (2014). Organizational trust and job satisfaction: A study on hotels. Business Management Dynamics, 4(1),12-28.Halis, M., Gökgöz, G. S., & Yaşar, Ö. (2007). Örgütsel güvenin belirleyici faktörleri ve bankacılık sektöründe bir uygulama. Manas University Journal of Social Sciences, 17, 187-205.
• Herzberg, F., & Mausner, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work, second ed. Wiley, New York.
• King, M., Murray, M. A., & Atkinson, T. (1982). Background, personality, job characteristics, and satisfaction with work in a national sample. Human Relation, 35(2), 119-133.
• Koçel, T. (2001). İşletme yöneticiliği, yönetim ve organizasyon, organizasyonlarda davranış klasik-modern-çağdaş ve güncel yaklaşımlar. 8. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Kuhn, T., & Poole, M. S. (2000). Do conflict management styles affect group decision making? Human Communication Research, 26(4), 558-590.
• Landy, F. J. & Conte, J. M. (2010). Work in the 21st century an introduction to industrial and organizational Psychology. California: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Lee, C., Song, H., Lee, H., Lee, S., & Bernhard, B. J., (2013).The impact of CSR on casino employees’ organizational trust, job satisfaction, and customer orientation: An empirical examination of responsible gambling strategies. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33(1), 406-415.
• Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(4), 309-336.
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect -and cognition- based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
• Matthai, J. M. (1989). Employee perceptions of trust, satisfaction, and commitment as predictors of turnover intentions in a mental health setting. Doctoral Dissertation, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Dissertation Abstracts International, DAI-B 51/02.
• Mayer, R. C, Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
• Mishra, J., & Morrissey, M. A. (1990). Trust in employee/employer relationships: A survey of West Michigan Managers. Public Personnel Management, 19(4), 443-486.
• Oldham, G. (1975). The impact of supervisory characteristics on goal acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 461-475.
• Olson, B. J., Nelson, D. L., & Parayitam, S. (2006). Managing aggression in organizations: What leaders must know? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(5), 384-398.
• Özdemir, M. (2008). Kurum içi çatışmaların yönetilmesi ve eğitim kurumlarında çatışma yönetiminin iş tatminine etkisi. Master’s Thesis, Beykent University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
• Özgan, H. (2011).The relationships between organizational justice, confidence, commitment, and evaluating the manager and the perceptions of conflict management at the context of organizational behavior. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 241-247.
• Pearson, C. A. (1991). An assessment of extrinsic feedback on participation, role, perceptions, motivation, and job satisfaction in a self-managed system for monitoring group achievement. Human Relations, 44(5), 517-537.
• Perry, R. W., & Mankin, L. D (2007). Organizational trust, trust in the chief executive and work satisfaction. Public Personnel Management, 36(2), 165-179.
• Polat, M. (2009).Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri ve ardılları üzerine bir saha çalışması. Doctoral Dissertation. Uludağ University Social Sciences Institute, Bursa.
• Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80(2), 151-176.
• Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376.
• Rahim M. A. (1986). Managing Conflict in Organizations. Praeger Publishers, New York, USA.
• Rahim, M. A. (1992). Managing conflict in organizations (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger
• Rahim, M. A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3c), 1323-1344
• Rahim, M. A., & Buntzman, G. F. (1989). Supervisory power bases, styles of handling conflict with subordinates, and subordinate compliance and satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 123(2), 195-210.
• Robinson, S. (1996). Trust and the breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574-599.
• Ruble, T. L., & Thomas, K. W. (1976). Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 143-155.
• Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Winograd, G. (2000). Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters. Organization Development Journal, 18(4), 35-48.
• Simon, S. K. (1996). Total quality management and its impact on middle managers and front-line workers. Journal of Management Development, 15(7), 41-43.
• Sims, R. R. (2002). Managing organizational behavior. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
• Smith, W. P. (1987). Conflict and negotiation: Trends and emerging issues. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(7), 641-677.
• Smyth T. (1985). Confronting conflict. Nursing Mirror, 160(10), 23-25.
• Spector, P. E., (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. SAGE Publications, London.
• Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 651-717). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict MODE instrument. New York: XICOM, Tuxedo.
• Toprak, L. S., Şentürk, F. K., & Kılıç, G. (2017). Yöneticilerin çatışma yönetme yöntemleri ile yöneticiye duyulan güven arasındaki ilişki: Afyonkarahisar’daki beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 5(2), 105-133.
• Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. Applied Social Psychology in Business Settings, ed. J. Carroll, Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum, 77-98.
• Wicks, A. C., & Berman, S. L. (2004). The effects of context on trust in firm-stakeholder relationships: The institutional environment, trust creation, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(1), 141-160.
• Üngüren, E., Cengiz, F., Algür, S, (2009). İş tatmini ve örgütsel çatışma yönetimi arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi: Konaklama işletmeleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(27), 36-56.
• White, P. (1998). Fighting fit. Nursing Management, 4(8), 7.
• Yoon, M. H.,& Suh, J. (2003). Organizational citizenship behaviors and service quality as external effectiveness of contact employees. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 597-611.