CHILD PLAY AND TOY IN TWO GENERATIONS: “UPON A CHILDHOOD HISTORY”

Öz

The aim of this study is to define historical evolution of child play and toy within two generations in context of socio economic and political conditions in Turkey Due to this aim two periods of time were determined These time periods consist of 1950 1960: Government of Democrat Party and 1990 2000: Post 1980 period The reason of deciding on these periods is that they were political economic and cultural turning points in Republican Period The period between 1950 and 1960 is young Republic’s passing to multiparty system from one party state meanwhile departing from its basic ideology; getting acquainted with American assistance and Marshall Plans and moreover choosing its political side in the international area 1950s also witnessed a mass migration from rural to urban areas and as a result population growth and emergence of indigenous bourgeoisie in big cities This period is also considered as changing perception in childhood Between period 1990 and 2000 a new middle class emerged with free market economy and liberal values state’s responsibility over public life decreased and the understanding of welfare state weakened After the breakdown of USSR United States turned into the biggest power in all areas and globalization was accepted without questioning In communication field one channel broadcast left its place to multichannel broadcast; new technologies such as computer internet and mobile phone came into our lives This short ten year period changed the understanding of child childhood and child play by means of human conception In this study oral history was used as methodology as oral history based on memory and testimony to gain a more complete or different understanding of a past experienced both individually and collectively Bornat 2004:35 Interviews were conducted in order to determine forms types and structures of child plays and toys within specified periods and to analyze changes in the course of time The sample of this study consisted of 20 narrators from two generations Semi structured interviews with the people between 60 65 and 20 25 ages were conducted in this study The draft of semi structured interview form was developed by researchers and than presented to expert view necessary corrections were made Video camera was used during the interviews and photographs were taken On the other hand after getting individual permission narrators’ childhood photographs were taken and examined Interview recordings were coded by the researchers individually to strengthen reliability of the research The categories were ultimately generated after all data was analysed and relevant categories were organized under the research questions Key Words: childhood history history of child play child play toy were taken and examined. Interview recordings were coded by the researchers individually to strengthen reliability of the research. The categories were ultimately generated after all data was analysed, and relevant categories were organized under the research questions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• childhood history,history of child play,child play,toy

CHILD PLAY AND TOY IN TWO GENERATIONS: “UPON A CHILDHOOD HISTORY”

Öz

.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• xx

Kaynakça

1. Artar, M.; Onur, B.; Çelen, N. (2004). “Çocuk oyunlarında üç kuşakta görülen değişimler: Kırsal kesimde bir araştırma”, Türkiye’de Çocuk Oyunları: Araştırmalar, (Ed.) Onur, B.; Güney, N., Ankara: ÇOKAUM Yayınları
2. Bornat, J. (2004), “Oral History”, Qualitative Research Practice, (Ed.) Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium and David Silverman. London: Sage Publications
3. Çok, F.; Artar, M.; Şener, T.; Bağlı, M. T. (1997). “Kentlerde açık alanlarda çocuk oyunları: Ankara örneği”, Çocuk Kültürü 1. Ulusal Çocuk Kültürü Kongresi, (Ed.) Onur, B., Ankara: ÇOKAUM Yayınları.
4. Göncü, A. (2001). “Toplumsal ve kültürel bağlamın çocuk oyunlarındaki yeri”, Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Değişen Çocukluk III. Ulusal Çocuk Kültürü Kongresi Bildirileri, (Ed.) Onur, B., Ankara: ÇOKAUM Yayınları
5. Huizinga, J. (2000). Homo Ludens Oyunun Toplumsal İşlevi Üzerine Bir Deneme, (Çev. M. Ali Kılıçbay), Ayrıntı Yayınları.
6. Karsten, L. (2005). “It All Used To Be Beter?: Different Generations on Continuity and Change in urban Children’s Daily Use of Space”, Children’s Geographies, Vol: 3, No: 3, December, ss. 275-290.
7. Moyles, R. J. (1996). Just Playing The Role and Status of Play in Early Childhood Education, Open University Pres.
8. İnal, K. (2005). “Çocuksu masumiyetten plastik paradoksa, oyuncağın kısa tarihi”, Kebikeç, sayı 19, s. 253-275.

9. Onur, B. (2005). Türkiye’de Çocukluğun Tarihi, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi
10. Onur, B.; Çelen, N.; Çok, F.; Artar, m.; Demir, T. Ş. (2004). “Türkiye’de iki kentte annelerin bakış açısıyla çocukların oyuncak gereksinmesi”, Türkiye’de Çocuk Oyunları: Araştırmalar, (Ed.) Onur, B.; Güney, N., Ankara: ÇOKAUM Yayınları.
11. Ortaylı, İ. (2000). Osmanlı Toplumunda Aile, İstanbul: Pan Yayıncılık.
12. Piers, M. W., Landau, G. M. (1980). The Gift of Play and Why Children Cannot Thrive Without It. New York: Walker and Co.
13. Sutton-Smith, B. (1999). “Methods in children’s folklore”, (Ed.) Sutton-Smith, Mechling, Johnson, Mcmahon, Children’s Folklore, Logan: Utah State University Pres.
14. Endnote: This research was granted by Turkish Scientific & Technological Research Council
15. of Turkey (TUBITAK) and this study presented at Change and Resistance, An
16. International Conference of social Transformation and Education, 15-17 June 2007, Gdansk, Poland.