COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE: AN INVESTIGATION INTO ITS IMPACT ON ELT STUDENTS’ PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Öz

It is well documented in the literature of teacher training that working in collaborative groups enable teachers to reconstruct their professional knowledge e g Hung Der Thanq 2001 Such a process assists pre and in service teachers to take on partial but meaningful roles on the way to becoming full participants in a teacher community while constructing knowledgeable skills through reflection on action The notion underlying this type of professional learning is grounded on the theory of Communities of Practice CoP where student teachers try to solve problems through interactions with others in the community and through conceptualizing and re conceptualizing Wenger 1998 In this respect the aim of this study is to identify the impact of adopting a CoP approach to pre service English Language Teaching ELT students’ personal and professional development The data for the study were obtained from 18 ELT students’ weekly journals they kept for three months and semi structured interviews Findings reveal that applying CoP approach to pre service ELT teacher education has multidimensional impacts on students’ personal and professional development Keywords: communities of practice pre service teacher education personal and professional development

Anahtar Kelimeler

• communities of practice, pre-service teacher education, personal and professional development

COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE: AN INVESTIGATION INTO ITS IMPACT ON ELT STUDENTS’ PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Öz

Öğretmenlerin grup içinde işbirliğine dayalı çalışmalarının profesyonel gelişimlerine katkıda bulunduğu öğretmen eğitimi literatüründe sıkça vurgulanmaktadır (Hung & Der-Thanq, 2001). Hizmet öncesi veya hizmet içinde böyle bir sürece dahil olmak, öğretmenler için başta kısmi ama anlamlı roller almalarını ve giderek öğretmen topluluğunun tam bir üyesi olmaları kolaylaştırmakta; bir yandan da geri-düşünme yoluyla yeni beceriler kazanmalarını sağlamaktadır. Söz konusu olan mesleki öğrenme yönteminin “Uygulayıcı Topluluk” kuramına dayanmaktadır. Bu yöntemde öğrenciler topluluğun diğer üyeleri ile sürekli iletişim içinde kavramsallaştırma yoluyla öğrenirler (Wenger, 1998). Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma Uygulayıcı Topluluk yönteminin uygulanmasının İngiliz Dili ve Eğitimi öğrencilerinin kişisel ve mesleki gelişimleri üzerine etkilerini saptamayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmanın verileri 18 İngiliz Dili ve Eğitimi öğrencilerinin üç ay boyunca tuttukları haftalık günlükler ile onlarla yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar Uygulayıcı Topluluk yönteminin katılımcı öğrencilerin kişisel ve mesleki gelişimleri üzerine çok yönlü etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• xx

Kaynakça

1. Akerson, V. L., Donnelly, A. L., Riggs, L. M., & Eastwood J. L. (2012). Developing a community of practice to support pre-service elementary teachers‟ nature of science instruction, International Journal of Science Education - INT J SCI EDUC , 34(9), 1371-1392.
2. Appel, G., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
3. Barab, S.A., MaKinster, J.G., Moore, J.A., Cunningham, D., & The ILF DesignTeam (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
4. Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers‟ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 (5), 435-455.
5. Calderwood, P. (2000). Learning community: Finding common ground in difference. New York: Teachers College of Columbia University.
6. Clancey, W. J. (1995). A Tutorial on Situated Learning. In J. Self, (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Education (Taiwan) (pp.49- 70). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
7. Donato, J., & Mccormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective of language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 124141, 1994.
8. Friend, M & Cook, L. (1990). Collaboration as a Predictor for Success in School Reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1 (1), 69-86.

9. Gormus, A., S & Aydın, S. (2008). Individualism as An Ascending Value in Turkey and A Research Conducted Among University Students, First International Conference On Management And Economics, Epoka University, Tiran.
10. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S. S., & Woolworth, S. (2000). What makes teacher community different from a gathering of teachers. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
11. Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P.(1999). Teaching to learn, learning to teach? Schoolbased non-teaching activity in an initial teacher education and training partnership scheme, Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(3), 273– 2
12. Hung, D., & Der-Thang, C. (2001). Situated cognition, vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: Implications for the design of web-based e-learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 18(3), 34- 45.
13. Hung, D., & Nichani, M. R. (2002). Bringing communities of practice into schools: Implications for instructional technologies from vygotskian perspectives. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 171-183. Jarvela, S., & Niemivirta, M. (1999). The changes in learning theory and the topicality of the recent research on motivation. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 1, 57-65.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner Support Services for online students: Scaffolding for success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,4(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.1/dunlap.html.
16. Maddux, C. D., Johnson, D. L., & Willis, J. W. (1997). Social constructivism. Educational computing: Learning with tomorrow’s technologies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Moran, M. J. (2007). Collaborative action research and project work: Promising practices for the development of inquiry among early childhood preservice teachers. International Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 4184
18. Mule, L. (2006). Preservice teachers‟ inquiry in a professional development school context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 205–218.
19. Poole, M. (2001). Developing online communities of practice in preservice teacher education. Retrieved 6, 2012, from newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/161.pdf.
20. Powell, R. (2000). Case-based teaching in homogeneous teacher education contexts: a study of preservice teachers' situative cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 389-410.
21. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Sawyer, R. D. (2002). Situating teacher development: The view from two teachers‟ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 7337
23. Schinke-Liano, L. (1993). On the value of a vygotskian framework for SLA theory and research. Language Learning, 43 (1), 121-129.
24. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Smith, M. K. (2003). Communities of Practice. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved 4, 2005, from www.infed.org/biblio/learningsocial.htm.
25. Sutherland, L. M., Scanlon, L., & Sperring, A. (2005). A new direction in preparing teachers: using a school–university partnership to engaging preservice professionals in communities of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1),79–92.
26. Van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-case curriculum to develop preservice teachers„ knowledge and skills. In M. S. Smith, & S. N. Friel (Eds.), Cases in mathematics teacher education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching, (pp. 117-132). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
27. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning meaning and identity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: the key to a knowledge strategy. Knowledge Directions, 1(2), 48-63.
29. Wenger, E. (2002). Communities of practice. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 1(5), Article 5. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
30. Wilson, B. (1996). Introduction: What is a constructivist learning environment? In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp.17-24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.