Dominant Currency Hypothesis And Credibility Issues: The Case Of European Monetary System

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 145 - 160, 15.10.2014

Murat Pütün

Öz

Linked to the gold standard of post war Monetary System, Bretton Woods System governed world-wide bilateral exchange rates successfully over the decades. The monetary stability that had been reached and maintained over the years within the system was largely attributed to the design of the system within which U.S. had undertaken the dominant role in determining the monetary trajectory for other participants. The international or regional monetary systems worked on the basis of likewise leadership models, would pave the way for theoretical considerations in the literature. Dominant Currency Hypothesis is to explain that in a given fixed exchange rate system in which there are n numbers of the participant currencies, if there is a leading country which is relatively stronger than others in economic terms; its currency will equally be stronger and will be able lead others in terms of monetary policy. The leading country authorities will hold total independence in monetary policy making whereas the followers will be bound by the actions of leader country. That is to say, the anchor country independently determines its domestic monetary policy path whereas the weak currencies’ monetary authorities would have to follow its foot steps passively in the hope of gaining anti-inflationary credibility. Regarding the European Monetary System (EMS), The Bundesbank would act as an anchor in the EMS. Other members, particularly those with high inflationary reputation would benefit by subscribing to the policies of the anchor. The disciplinary policies determined by Bundesbank would be imitated by them.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dominant Currency Hypothesis, German Dominance, European Monetary System, Exchange Rate Mechanism, Bretton Woods System

Kaynakça

• Artus, P. And Bourguinat, H. (1994) “The stability of the EMS”, in 30 Years of European Monetary Integration from the Werner Plan to EMU, Longman Group Limited, 1994. Baum, C.F. and Barkoulas, J. (2001), “Dynamics of Intra-EMS interest rate Linkages,” Boston College Working Papers in Economics 492, Boston College Department of Economics. Barrel, R., (1992), Economic Convergence and Monetary Union in Europe, Edited by Ray Barrel, National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1993), “Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Integration”, in Torres, F. and Giavazzi, F., (eds.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, Cambridge University Press. Bean, C. (1992), “Economic and Monetary Union in Europe”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.6, no.2 Fall. Campa, J.M., Chang, P.H.K. and Reider (1997), “ERM bandwidths for EMU and after: evidence from foreign Exchange options.” Economic Policy, A European Forum, 24, 24April 1997. Caporele, G.; Kalyvitis, S.; Pittis, N. (1996),”Interest rate convergence, capital controls, risk premia, and foreign exchange market efficiency in the EMS”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 18, 693-714. Cukierman, A., (1990), Central Bank Strategy, Credibility and Independence: Theory and Evidence, MIT Pres, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Baro, R.J. and Gordon, D. (1983), “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model Monetary Policy”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12,101-121. Choudry, T. (2002), “Money-Income Relationship Between three ERM countries”, Applied Economics, 2002 V 59-94. European Commission (1990), “One Market One Money”, Economic Papers, European Economy, no: 44, October, 1990. Farina, F. (1991), “From EMS to EMU: The role of policy coordination,” 3rd series-may 1991, no:v-rıvısta dı polıtıca economıca. Fidrmuc, J. (2001), The Endogeneity of Optimum Currency Area Criteria, intraindustry trade and EMU enlargement, Bank of Finland, Discussion Papers 2001, No.8,Institute for Economies in transition, BOFIT. Fischer, S. (1987), “International Macroeconomic Policy Coordination”, NBER Working Paper Series, 2244. Frieden, J. (1994), “Making Commitments: France and Italy in the European Monetary System, 1979-1985”, The political economy of European Monetary Unification, Edited by Barry Eichengreen and Jefry Freiden, Westview press, 1994. Giavazzi, F. and Giovannini, A. (1988), “The Role of the Exchange Rate in a Disinflation”, in F. Giavazzi and M. Miller (eds.), The European Monetary System, Cambridge University Press. Giavazzi, F. and Giovannini, A. (1989), Limiting Exchange Rate Flexibility: The European Monetary System, Cambridge, MIT Press. Giavazzi, F. and Pagano, M. (1988), “The advantage of Tying One’s Hand: EMS Discipline and Central Bank Credibility”, European Economic Review, 32: 1055-77. Gross, D., and Thygesen, N., (1992), European Monetary Integration from EMS to EMU, Longman, London. Katsimbris, G.M. and Miller, S.M. (1993), “Interest rate linkages within the European Monetary System: Further Analysis.” Journal of money, credit and banking, 25, 771-779. Krugman, P. (1988), “Target Zones and Exchange Rate Dynamics”, NBER Working Papers 2481, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Krugman, P. (1993), “Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU”, In: Torres, F. and Giavazzi, F. (ed.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, Cambridge University Press. Kydland, F.E. and Prescott, E.C. (1977), “Rules Rather than Discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.85 (3) pp.473-91. Putun, M. (2013), “Testing Monetary Policy Autonomy: German Dominance Hypothesis Revisited”, Niğde University, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Volume: 6, No: 2, 2013 Ranki, S., (1998), Exchange Rates in European Monetary Integration, Suomen Pankk, Bank of Finland, Bank of Finland Studies, E:9, 1988, p.13. Rogoff, K. (1985), “The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target”, Quarterly journal of Economics, Vol.100: 1169-90. Rubio, O.B. and Garces, M.D.M. (2002), “Was there monetary autonomy in Europe on the eve of EMU? The German dominance Hypothesis Re-examined”, Journal of Applied Economics, 185-207. Weber, A. A. (1991), “Credibility, Reputation and European Monetary System,” Economic Policy, 12, pp.57-102. Weber, A. A. (1992), “The role of policymakers’ reputation in the EMS disinflations,” European Economic Review, 36 (1992), 1473-1492. Von Hagen and Fratianni (1990), “German Dominance in the EMS: Evidence from interest rates”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol.9, pp.358-375.