YIKICI YÖNETİMİN İZLENİM YÖNETİMİ TAKTİKLERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: BEYAZ YAKALI ÇALIŞANLAR ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 441 - 456, 30.10.2016

Bilge Aksay , Utku Güğerçin

Öz

Her ne kadar yönetim yazını, yöneticilerin olumlu özelliklerine odaklansa da tarihte ve günümüz örgütlerinde sadist, tiran ve yıkıcı yönetici örnekleri de görülmektedir. Yöneticilerin astlarına karşı fiziksel olmayan düşmanca davranışları şeklinde tanımlanan yıkıcı yönetim altında astlar, farklı izlenim yönetimi taktiklerini izleyebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, "Yıkıcı yönetim altında çalışanlar hangi izlenim yönetimi taktiklerini uygulamaktadır?" sorusundan hareketle, izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin yıkıcı yönetimi algılama düzeyine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediği çok değişkenli varyans analizi ile incelenmektedir. 178 beyaz yakalı çalışan üzerinde yapılan araştırma neticesinde, yıkıcı yönetimi algılama düzeyine göre niteliklerini tanıtma, tehdit etme, erdemli görünme, kendini sevdirme ve kendini acındırma olmak üzere izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmanın; izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin tamamını ele alması ve izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin yıkıcı yönetimi algılama düzeyi ile ilişkilendirilmesi açısından alanyazına katkı sağladığı düşünülmektedir. Araştırmada yıkıcı yönetim ile izlenim yönetimi taktiklerine ilişkin bilgiler yanında uygulayıcılara yönelik öneriler de sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yıkıcı yönetim, yıkıcı liderlik, toksik liderlik, izlenim yönetimi taktikleri, imaj yönetimi

Kaynakça

• Agle, B. R., Nagarajan, N. J., Sonnenfeld, J. A., & Srinivasan, D. (2006). Does CEO charisma matter? An empirical analysis of the relationships among organizational performance, environmental uncertainty, and top management team perceptions of CEO charisma. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 161-174. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Psychology, 53(1), 27. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201. Ashforth, B. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126 –140. Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6), 723-752. Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of r WG and r WG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66-80. Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080-1109. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187-206. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003). More than one way to make an impression: Exploring profiles of impression management. Journal of Management, 29(2), 141-160. Brees, J., Mackey, J., Martinko, M., & Harvey, P. (2014). The mediating role of perceptions of abusive supervision in the relationship between personality and aggression. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(4), 403-413. Byrne, B. M. "The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research." Review of Educational Research 54.3 (1984): 427-456. Castro, S., Douglas, C., Hochwarter, W., Ferris, G., & Frink, D. (2003). The effects of positive affect and gender on the influence tactics—job performance relationship. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10, 1−18 Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2013). G*Power Version 3.1.7 [computer software]. Uiversität Kiel, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.psycho.uniduesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/download-and-register Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River. Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 252-263. Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264-280. Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: a within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 731. Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039-1050. Ju, L., Lin, Z., Jing, X., & Meng, D. (2015). The influence of abusive supervision on work-to-family conflict: the mediation role of organizational justice, 2nd International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management (ERMM 2015) Proceedings Book, 284-286. Kacmar, K. M., & Tucker, R. (2016). The moderating effect of supervisor’s behavioral integrity on the relationship between regulatory focus and impression management. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 87-98. Karakuş, M. & Alev, S. (2016). Öğretmenlerin bireysel ve örgütsel değerleri ile izlenim yönetimi taktikleri seçimi arasındaki ilişki düzeyi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(33), 137-152. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., ... & Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 350-386. Klein, K. J. (Ed); Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed). (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions , (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass Lee, S., Yun, S., & Srivastava, A. (2013). Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 724-731. Lian, H., Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Liang, L. H., Keeping, L. M., & Morrison, R. (2014). Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 116-139. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present, and future.Psychosomatic medicine, 55(3), 234-247. Lazarus, R. S. (1995). Psychological stress in the workplace. Occupational Stress: A handbook, 1, 3-14. Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 107-123. Merecz, D., Drabek, M., & Mościcka, A. (2009). Aggression at the workplace—psychological consequences of abusive encounter with coworkers and clients. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 22(3), 243-260. Neves, P. (2014). Taking it out on survivors: Submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 507-534. Perrewé, P. L., & Zellars, K. L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 739-752. Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers' organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 270-285. Rao, A., Schmidt, S. M., & Murray, L. H. (1995). Upward impression management: Goals, influence strategies, and consequences. Human Relations, 48(2), 147-167. Schuler, R. S. (1982). An integrative transactional process model of stress in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 5-19. Sezici, E. (2016). İzleyicilerin yıkıcı liderlik algısı ve sonuçları. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (47), 106-121. Smith PB, Trompenaars E, Dugan S. (1995)ç. The Rotter locus of control scale in 43 countries: a test of cultural relativity. International Journal of Psychologhy, 30, 377-400. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190. Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289. Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974-983. Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79-92. UNISON. (1997). UNISON’s Members’ Experience of Bullying at Work. London: UNISON Uyguç, N. (2003). Cinsiyet, bireysel değerler ve meslek seçimi. D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F.Dergisi, 18(1),:93-103 Uz, İ. (2015). Nedensel belirsizlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16(Özel sayı.1):19-22 Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15. Vogel, R. M., Mitchell, M. S., Tepper, B. J., Restubog, S. L., Hu, C., Hua, W., & Huang, J. C. (2015). A cross‐cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior,36(5), 720-745. Xie, J. L., & Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1288-1309. Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076.