BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Trends In The Management Of Public Services

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 139 - 146, 01.09.2007

Öz

In this study for the last 20 years the trends in the management of public services have been discussed in the developed countries such as UK New Zeland Canada and Australia The reforms were initiated in the advanced capitalist democracies as a response to the public sector expansion process that had been such a dominant feature of the OECD countries after the Second World War Governments had grown too large with sprawling bureaucracies consuming ever more resources but failing to make significant improvements in service delivery Some private sector management techniques have been transferred to public sector management; such as privatization corporate management accountability and marketisation Key Words: New public management privatisation corporate management decentralisation accountability

Kaynakça

  • Agrawal, A and Ribot J. 1999. Accountability in Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and West African Environmental Cases. The Journal of Developing Areas 33: 473-502
  • Barlett, W., Propper, C., D. and Le Grand, J. (1994) Quasi-markets in the Welfare State. Bristol: SAUS Publications
  • Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) ‘The Managerial State’, London, Sage.
  • Christy, R. and Brown, J. (1999) Marketing in the Public Services, in Public Management in Britain, ed. Horton, S. and Farnham, D. Macmillan Press Ltd. p: 94-106
  • Crook, R. and Manor, J. 1998. Democracy and Descentralisation in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • Cutler, T. and Waine, B. (1994) ‘Managing the Welfare State’ London, Berg.
  • Doherty, T.L. and Home, T. (2002) Managing Public Services--Implementing Changes: A Thoughtful Approach to the Practice of Management. Routledge. London
  • Exworthy, M. and Halford, S. (1999) ‘Professionalism and the New Managerialism in the
  • Public Sector’Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.
  • Flynn, N. and Strehl, F. (1996) Public Sector Management in Europe,Hertfordshire,Prentice Hall.
  • Flynn, N. (2007), Public Sector Management, Sage Publications, Fifth Edition, UK.
  • Horton, S., Farnham, D., (1999) New Labour: Legacies, İmpact and Prospects; in Public Management in Britain, ed:Horton, S., and Farnham, D., MacMillan, UK
  • Johnsons, N. (1999), State Welfare, in the Student’s Companion Social Policy, ed: Alcock, P., Erskine, A., and May, M.,Blackwell Publishers, UK
  • Jones, L. R., and Kettl, D. F. (2004) “Assessing Public Management Reform Strategy in an International Context” Strategies for Public Management Reform Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 13, 453-473, Elsevier Ltd.
  • Lane, J.E. (1997) ‘Public Sector Reform’ Rationale, Trends and Problems, London, Sage.
  • OECD (1996) Ministerial Symposium on the Future of Public Services, at http://www.oecd.int/puma/gvrnance/minister/summary.htm
  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (2000) Governance and public administration, in Pierre, J. (ed) Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart, J. and Walsh, K. ‘Public Administration Vol. 70 Winter 1992’ Change in the Management of Public Services.
  • Stewart, J. (1993).The Limitations of Government by Contract’, Public Money and Management, July-September.
  • Walsh, K. (1995) 'Public Services and Market Mechanisms',Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management, London, Macmillian.
  • Yuliani, E.L. (2007), Decentralisation, deconcentration and devolution;what do they mean? Internet www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdffiles/interlaken/Compilation.pdf

The Trends In The Management Of Public Services

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 139 - 146, 01.09.2007

Öz

Bu çalışmada özellikle son 20 yılda İngiltere Yeni Zelanda Kanada ve Avustralya gibi gelişmiş ülkelerde kamu hizmetlerinin yönetim biçimlerindeki değişimler incelenmiştir Kamudaki reformlar ikinci dünya savaşından sonra OECD ülkelerindeki kamu sektörü bürokrasisinin gereğinden fazla genişlemesi sürecine tepki olarak ilk önceleri gelişmiş kapitalist batı ülkelerinde başladı Kamu sektöründe oldukça yaygınlaşan bürokrasinin kaynakları hızla tüketirken kamu hizmetlerinin sunumunda önemli iyileştirmeler yapamadığı bir süreç yaşanmıştır Özellikle sözkonusu ülkelerde bazı özel sektör yönetim yaklaşımlarının benimsenerek kamu örgütlerine aktarılması yeni kamu yönetimi anlayışının bir sonucu olmuştur Özelleştirme kurumsal yönetim yerelleşme ve hesap verebilirlik gibi yönetim tekniklerinin kamu hizmeti sunumunda kullanılmaları gittikçe yaygınlaşmaktadır Anahtar Kelimeler: Yeni kamu yönetimi özelleştirme kurumsal yönetim yerelleşme hesap verebilirlik

Kaynakça

  • Agrawal, A and Ribot J. 1999. Accountability in Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and West African Environmental Cases. The Journal of Developing Areas 33: 473-502
  • Barlett, W., Propper, C., D. and Le Grand, J. (1994) Quasi-markets in the Welfare State. Bristol: SAUS Publications
  • Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) ‘The Managerial State’, London, Sage.
  • Christy, R. and Brown, J. (1999) Marketing in the Public Services, in Public Management in Britain, ed. Horton, S. and Farnham, D. Macmillan Press Ltd. p: 94-106
  • Crook, R. and Manor, J. 1998. Democracy and Descentralisation in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • Cutler, T. and Waine, B. (1994) ‘Managing the Welfare State’ London, Berg.
  • Doherty, T.L. and Home, T. (2002) Managing Public Services--Implementing Changes: A Thoughtful Approach to the Practice of Management. Routledge. London
  • Exworthy, M. and Halford, S. (1999) ‘Professionalism and the New Managerialism in the
  • Public Sector’Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.
  • Flynn, N. and Strehl, F. (1996) Public Sector Management in Europe,Hertfordshire,Prentice Hall.
  • Flynn, N. (2007), Public Sector Management, Sage Publications, Fifth Edition, UK.
  • Horton, S., Farnham, D., (1999) New Labour: Legacies, İmpact and Prospects; in Public Management in Britain, ed:Horton, S., and Farnham, D., MacMillan, UK
  • Johnsons, N. (1999), State Welfare, in the Student’s Companion Social Policy, ed: Alcock, P., Erskine, A., and May, M.,Blackwell Publishers, UK
  • Jones, L. R., and Kettl, D. F. (2004) “Assessing Public Management Reform Strategy in an International Context” Strategies for Public Management Reform Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 13, 453-473, Elsevier Ltd.
  • Lane, J.E. (1997) ‘Public Sector Reform’ Rationale, Trends and Problems, London, Sage.
  • OECD (1996) Ministerial Symposium on the Future of Public Services, at http://www.oecd.int/puma/gvrnance/minister/summary.htm
  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (2000) Governance and public administration, in Pierre, J. (ed) Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart, J. and Walsh, K. ‘Public Administration Vol. 70 Winter 1992’ Change in the Management of Public Services.
  • Stewart, J. (1993).The Limitations of Government by Contract’, Public Money and Management, July-September.
  • Walsh, K. (1995) 'Public Services and Market Mechanisms',Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management, London, Macmillian.
  • Yuliani, E.L. (2007), Decentralisation, deconcentration and devolution;what do they mean? Internet www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdffiles/interlaken/Compilation.pdf
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Dr. Sefa Çetin Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2007
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Aralık 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çetin, D. S. (2007). The Trends In The Management Of Public Services. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(2), 139-146.