İşletmelerde Yenilik Yeteneği: Denizli Tekstil ve Hazır Giyim Sektörü Örneği

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine innovation capabilities of firms active in textile and wearing sector in Denizli and to investigate the relationship between innovation capability and determinant factors of innovation capability For this purpose a questionnaire is applied to firms active in textile and wearing sector in Denizli Questionnaire data is analyzed by logit and probit econometric estimation methods According to estimation results it is found that firm size R D activities investment purchase of technology service and ownership of quality certificate increase the probability of innovative activities that firms undertake Key Words: Firm level innovation Denizli textile and wearing sector

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

İŞLETMELERDE YENİLİK YETENEĞİ: DENİZLİ TEKSTİL VE HAZIR GİYİM SEKTÖRÜ ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Denizli ilinde tekstil ve hazır giyim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin yenilik yeteneklerini belirlemek ve yenilik yeteneği ile yenilik yeteneğini etkileyen faktörler arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bu amaçla Denizli’de tekstil ve hazır giyim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelere anket uygulanmıştır. Anket verileri, logit ve probit ekonometrik tahmin yöntemleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Ekonometrik tahmin bulgularına göre, işletme büyüklüğü, AR-GE faaliyetleri, yatırımlar, teknoloji hizmeti alımı ve kalite belgesi sahipliğinin işletmelerin yenilik yapma olasılıklarını arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşletme düzeyinde yenilik, Denizli tekstil ve hazır giyim sektörü

Kaynakça

1. Amendola, G., Dosi, G. ve Papagni, E. (1993). “The Dynamics of International
2. Competitiveness”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 129.
3. Arias-Aranda D., B. Minguela-Rata, A. Rodriguez-Duarte (2001), “Innovation and Firm Size: An Empirical Study for Spanish Engineering Consulting Companies”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Volume 4, Number 3.
4. Arundel, A., Paal, G. ve Soete, L. (1995), “Innovation Strategies of Europe’s Largest Industrial Firms”, EIMS, Publication No 23, European Commission
5. Bhattacharya M., H. Bloch (2004), “Determinants of Innovation”, Small Business Economics, Volume 22, Number 2.
6. Bosworth, D., Stoneman, P. Ve Sinha, U. (1996), “Technology Transfer, Information Flows and Collaboration: An Analysis of the C.I.S., EIMS, Publication No: 36, European Commission.
7. Comanor W. S. (1967), “Market Structure, Product Differentiation, and Industrial Research”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 81, Issue 4.
8. Crepon B., E. Duguet, J. Mairesse (1998), “Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level”, NBER, Working Paper No: 6696.

9. DETKİB, (2007), http://www.detkib.org.tr/turkce/denhak.htm, (erişim tarihi 22.09.2007).
10. Dolfsma W., G. Panne (2006), “Currents and Sub-currents in the River of Innovations – Explaining Innovativeness Using New-Product Announcements”, ERIM Report Series Research in Management, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam.
11. DSO (2003a), Denizli İmalat Sanayinin Pazarlama ve Rekabet Gücü, Denizli İli İmalat Sanayi Envanteri Serisi: 3, Denizli.
12. DSO (2003b), Denizli İmalat Sanayinde Üretim AR-GE ve Altyapı Durumu, Denizli İli İmalat Sanayi Envanter Serisi: 2, Denizli.
13. DSO (2007), http://www.dso.org.tr/files/attachments/281_i9.pdf (erişim tarihi: 10.10.2007).
14. DTO (2007), Ekonomik Yönü ile Denizli, Denizli Ticaret Odası Yayınları: 34, Denizli.
15. Durak, İ. (2005), Küreselleşme Sürecinde Şebeke Organizasyonlar ve Denizli Tekstil İşletmeleri Uygulaması, Ankara Üniversitesi SBE İşletme Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
16. Freeman, C., L. Soete (2003), Yenilik İktisadı, Çev: Ergun Türkcan, Tübitak Yayınları, Ankara.
17. Grup, H., U. Schmoch (1999), “Patent Statistics in the age of Globalization: New Legal
18. Procedures, New Analytical Methods, New Economic Interpretation”
19. Research Policy, 28.
20. Hulst, N. V., R. Mulder, L. Soete, (1991), “Exports and Technology in Manufacturing
21. Industry”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127, 2.
22. Lee C. (2004), “The Determinants of Innovation in the Malysian Manufacturing Sector: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level”, Centre on Regulation and Competition, Working Paper Series Paper Number: 60.
23. Long J. S. (1997), Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series 7, Sage Publications, USA.
24. Martinez-Ros E., J. M. Labeaga (2002), “The Relationship Between Firm Size and Innovation Activity: A Double Decision Approach and an Application to Spanish Manufacturing Firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Volume 11, Issue 1. OECD (2005), http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/Oslo_3_TR .pdf, (erişim tarihi:25.11.2008).
25. Öngüt Ç. E. (2007), Türk Tekstil ve Hazır Giyim Sanayinin Değişen Dünya Rekabet Şartlarına Uyumu, DPT-Uzmanlık Tezi, Yayın No: 2703, Ankara.
26. Pavitt K., M. Robson, J. Townsend (1987), “The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Volume 35, Issue 3.
27. Plehn-Dujowich J. M (2007), “Innovation, Firm Size, and RD Search”, Economics Bulletin, Volume 12, Number 17.
28. Roelandt T. J. A., P. W. L. Gerbrands, P. A. G. Bergeijk (2003), “Markets and Innovativeness: Does Structure Influence Innovation Performance?”, Research Memorandum 9902, OCFEB Erasmus University Rotterdam.
29. Rostow W. W. (1956), “The Take-Off Into Self-Sustained Growth”, The Economic
30. Journal, Vol. 66, No. 261.
31. Rostow W. W. (1979), “The World Economy: History and Prospect”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 442.
32. Sanguinetti P. (2005), “Innovation and R&D Expenditures in Argentina: Evidence From a Firm Level Survey” http://200.32.4.58/~sanguine/Innovation%20in%20Argentina_Preliminary_Re port8.pdf (erişim tarihi: 20.10.2007).
33. Scherer F. M. (1965), “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions”, American Economic Review, Volume 55, Number 5.
34. Scherer F. M. (1967), “Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers”, American Economic Review, Volume 57, Number 2.
35. Schumpeter, J. A. (1966), Kapitalizm, Sosyalizm ve Demokrasi 1, Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul.
36. Soete, L. (1981). “A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory”,
37. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117.
38. Symeonidis G. (1996), “Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes”, OECD Working Papers, No: 161, Paris.
39. TÜİK (2006), http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=218 (erişim tarihi: 10.10.2007).
40. TÜİK (2007a), http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=584 (erişim tarihi: 20.10.2007).
41. TÜİK (2007b), http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=630 (erişim tarihi: 20.10.2007).
42. TÜİK (2007c), http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=631 (erişim tarihi: 20.10.2007).