The Importance of Somatic Cell Counts in Dairy Goat Husbandry and Effect on Milk Quality

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 35 - 42, 30.06.2017

Özgül Anitaş Serap Göncü , Nazan Koluman

Öz

Factories that have transformed raw materials into products by providing services to consumers, both producers and consumers, demand better quality products in developed countries today. Milk has particular importance, especially when it comes to human nutrition and the broath range of products in the market is also taken into consideration. Milk somatic cell count (SCC) is of great importance for the milk maker as well as for the milk processing industry, which today wants to offer quality products to consumers. Because, a milk producer, daily practices such as milking or cleaning can affect the amount of milk SCC content and therefore the amount of milk and quality of the milk. The United States accepts as the commercial standard the maximum amount of somatic cells in goat milk as 1000 000 / ml70% of somatic cells in goat milk are composed of neutrophils, 21% are lymphocytes and 0.4% are epithelial cells. Compared to cow milk, goat's milk contains numerous cytoplasmic particles and leukocytes, as well as epithelial cells. This study will focus on the importance of the number of somatic cells and milk quality in dairy goats.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Milk goats, Breast Structure, Somatic Cell Count

Süt Keçiciliğinde Somatik Hücre Sayısının Önemi ve Süt Kalitesine Etkisi

Öz

Bugün hayvancılığı gelişmiş ülkelerde, gerek üretici gerekse tüketiciye hizmet sunarak, ham maddeyi mamul maddeye dönüştüren fabrikalar, daha kaliteli ürün talep etmektedir. Özellikle, insan beslenmesinde ve pazardaki ürün yelpazesinin genişliği de dikkate alınırsa süt, ayrı bir önem arz etmektedir. Süt Somatik Hücre Sayısı (SHS) bugün tüketiciye kaliteli ürün sunmak isteyen süt işleme sanayisine olduğu kadar süt üreticisi için de çok büyük bir önem arz etmektedir. Çünkü bir süt üreticisi, günlük olarak yaptığı sağım veya gübre temizliği gibi uygulamalarla süt SHS içeriği ve dolayısıyla meme sağlığı ve sonuçta da ürettiği toplam süt miktarı üzerinde etkili olabilmektedir. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, ticari standart olarak keçi sütlerindeki azami somatik hücre miktarını 1000 000/ml olarak kabul etmektedir. Keçi sütlerindeki somatik hücrelerin %70’ini nötrofil, %21’ini lenfosit ve %0,4’ünün epitel hücreler oluşturur. İnek sütüne kıyasla keçi sütü çok sayıda sitoplazmik partiküller ve lökositlerin yanı sıra epitel hücreler de içerir. Bu çalışma ile süt keçilerinde SHS’ nın önemi ve süt kalitesine etkisi üzerinde durulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Süt Keçileri, Meme Yapısı, Somatik Hücre Sayısı

Kaynakça

• Batu A., 1978. Sığır mastitisi. Pendik Vet. Mikrob. Derg., 10,2: 63-91.
• Baştan A, Kaymaz M, Fındık M, Erünal N. 1997. İneklerde subklinik mastitislerin elektriksel iletkenlik, somatik hücre sayısı ve California mastitis test ile saptanması. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg. 44: 1-6.
• Boutinaud M, Jammes H, 2002. Potential uses of milk epithelial cells: a review. Reprod Nutr Dev 42(2): 133-147.
• Boyazoglu J, Morand-Fehr P, 2001. Mediterranean dairy sheep and goat products and their quality, a critical review. Small Rumin Res 40(1): 1-11.
• Burvenich C, Van MV, Mehrzad J, Diez-Fraile A, Duchateau L. E. coli mastitis şiddeti esas olarak inek faktörleri tarafından belirlenir. Veterinerlik Sorunu 2003; 34 : 521-564.
• Burriel AR, 2000. Somatic cell counts determined by the Coulter or Fossomatic Counter and their relationship to administration of oxytocin. Small Rumin Res 35(1): 81-84.
• Capote J, Castro N, Caja G, Fernández G, Briggs H, Argüello A, 2008. Effects of the frequency of milking and lactation stage on milk fractions and milk composition in Tinerfeña dairy goats. Small Rumin Res 75(2-3): 252-255.
• Contreras A, Sánchez A, Corrales JC, Marco JC, 1997. Concepto e importancia de las mamitis caprinas. Ovis 58: 11-31.
• Doğruer, G., Sarıbay, M.K., Ergün, Y., Aslantaş, Ö. (2010). Treatment Of subclinical mastitis in damascus goats during lactation. Small Rum. Res., 90: 153-155.
• Droke EA, Paape MJ, Di Carlo AL. Prevalence of high somatic cell counts in bulk tank goat milk. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76: 1035-1039.
• Dulin AM, Paape MJ, Schultze WD, Weinland BT, 1983. Effect of Parity, stage of lactation, and intramammary infection on concentration of somatic cells and cytoplasmic particles in goat milk. J Dairy Sci 66(11): 2426-2433.
• Erdoğan I, Batu E. Keçi mastitislerinin teşhisinde CMT ve bakteriyolojik yoklamalar ile somatik Hücre sayımı yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması üzerinde bir araştırma. Pendik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Enst Derg 1980; 12: 5-16.
• Escobar, E. N. 1999. Somatic Cells in Goat Milk. Pages 110-114 in Proc. 14th Ann. Goat Field Day, Langston University, Langston, OK.
• Gonzalo C, Ariznabarreta A, Carriedo JA, San Primitivo F, 2002. Mammary pathogens and their relationship to somatic cell count and milk yield losses in dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 85(6): 1460-1467.
• Gonzalo C, 2005. Somatic cell of sheep and goat milks, analytical, sanitary, productive and technological aspects. In: International dairy federation (Future of sheep and goats dairy sector) 0501/part 3 (Special Issue): 128-133.
• Haenlein, G.F.W., 2001. The concept of milk quality in the USA. Int. J. Anim. Sci. 16 (1), 5–8
• Hunter, A.C., 1984. Microflora and somatic cell content of goat milk. Vet. Record. 114, 318-320.
• Jones, G.M., Pearson R.E., Clabaugh, G.A., Health, C.W. 1984. Relationships between somatic cell count and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 67:1823-31.
• Kalantzopoulos, G., Dubeuf, J.P., Vallerand, F., Pirisi, A., Casalta, E.,Lauret, A., Trujillo, T., 2004. Characteristics of sheep and goatmilks: quality and hygienic factors for the sheep and goat dairysectors. Bull. IDF 390, 17–28
• Kalogridou-Vassliadou, D., Manolkidis, K. & Tsigoda, A., 1992. Somatic cell counts in relation to infection status of the goat udder. J. Dairy Res. 59, 21-28.
• Kapture, J., 1980. Somatic counts don’t tell whole mastitis story with goat milk. Dairy Goat Guide. Dec. 3, 9.
• Kozacinski, L., Hadziosmanovic, M., Majic, T., Karadjole, I. & Cvrtila, Z., 2002. Relationships between the results of mastitis tests, somatic cell counts and the detection of mastitis in goat’s milk. Tierarztliche-Umschau. 57 (5), 255-260.
• Leitner G, Merin U, Glickman A, Weisblit L, Krifucks O, Shwimmer A, Saran A, 2004. Factors influencing milk and quality in assaf sheep and goats crossbreds. South Afr. J Anim Sci 31(1): 162-164.
• Lerondelle, C. & Poutrel, B., 1984. Characteristics of non-clinical mammary infections of goats. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires. 15, 105-112.
• Manlongat N, Yang TJ, Hinckley LS, Bendel RB, Krider M, 1998. Physiologic chemoattractant induced migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in milk. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 5: 375-381.
• Marco JC, Jacquin C, Esnal A, Jiménez R, Sánchez M, Gonzalo C, 2012. Los programas de mejora de la calidad de la leche: Su impacto en la rentabilidad de las explotaciones de caprino lechero. Tierras Caprino 2: 8-19.
• McDermott, M.P., Erb, H.N., Natzke, R.P., 1982. Predictability by somatic cell counts related to prevalence of intramammary infection within herds. J. Dairy Sci. 65, 1535–1539.
• Nesbakken, T., 1976. [The cell count in milk of goats.] Diagnosis Nordisk Veterinormedici. 28, 550-556.
• Nonnecke, B. J., and J. A. Harp. 1986. Effect of chronic staphylococcal mastitis on Mitogenic responses of bovine lymphocytes. J. Dairy Sci. 68:3323.
• Okada M., 1960. Histology of the mammary gland, VII. Histological and histochemical studies of cells in the milk of domestic animals. Tohoku. J. Agric. Res. 11, 31.
• Paape MJ, Capuco AV, 1997. Cellular defense mechanisms in the udder and lactation of goats. J Anim Sci 75: 556-565.
• Paape MJ, Poutrel B, Contreras A, Marco JC, Capuco AV, 2001. Milk somatic cells and lactation in small ruminants. J Dairy Sci 84: 237-244.
• Paape MJ, Wiggans GR, Bannerman DD, Thomas DL, Sanders AH, Contreras A, Moroni P, Miller RH, 2007. Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts. Small Rumin Res 68(1-2): 114-125.
• Perez, M. & Schultz, I.L.H., 1979. Somatic cells in goat milk. Proc. Annual Meeting Nat. Mastitis Council. 18, 44-49.
• Pettersen, K.E. (1981). Cell content in goat’s milk. Acta Vet. Scand. 22, 226–237.
• Poutrel, B., and C. Lerondelle. 1983. Cell content of goat milk: CMT, Coulter Counter and Fossomatic for predicting half infection. J. Dairy Sci. 66:2575–2579.
• Poutrel, B. & Rainard, P., 1981. California Mastitis Test guide of selective dry cow therapy. J. Dairy Sci. 64, 241-248.
• Raynal-Ljutovac, K., Gaborit, P., Lauret, A., 2005. The relationshipbetween quality criteria of goat milk, its technological proper-ties and the quality of the final products. Small Rumin. Res. 60,167–177
• Ribeiro AC, Ribeiro SDA, 2010. Specialty products made from goat milk. Small Rumin Res 89: 225- 233.
• Roguinsky, M. Redon, J.F. & Le Mons, P., 1971. Causes and diagnostics of goat mastitis. La Chevre. 68, 43-45.
• Rota AM, Gonzalo C, Rodríguez PL, Rojas AI, Martin L, Tovar JJ, 1993a. Somatic cell types in goats milk in relation to total cell count, stage and number of lactation. Small Rumin Res 12 (1): 89-98.
• Rupp R, Boichard D, Bertrand C, Bazin S (2000) Overview of milk somatic cell counts in the French dairy cattle breeds. Prod Anim 13:257–267
• Schalm, O.W., Carrol, B.S. & Jain, N.C., 1971. Bovine Mastitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA.
• Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U, Prosser CG, 2010. Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: quality, safety and production aspects. Small Rumin Res 89(2-3): 110-124.
• Souza FN, Blagitz MG, Penna CFAM, Della Libera AMMP, Heinemann MB, Cerqueira MMOP, 2012. Somatic cell count in small ruminants, friend or foe? Small Rumin Res 107(2): 65-75.
• Vihan VS. Determination of NAGase activity in milk for diagnosis of subclinical caprine mastitis. Small Rumin Res 1989; 16: 165-169.
• Yağcı İP. 2008. Koyunlarda Subklinik Mastitis: Etiyoloji, Epidemiyoloji ve Tanı Yöntemleri. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 14: 117-122.
• Zeng SS, Escobar EN. Effect of parity and milk production on somatic cell count, standart plate count and composition of goat milk. Small Rumin Res 1995; 17: 269-274.
• Zeng SS. Comparison of goat milk standards with cow milk standards for analyses of somatic cell count, fat and protein in goat milk. Small Rumin Res 1996; 21: 221-225.