Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders from an Islamic Perspective
Öz
In modern medicine and technologies, it is commonly accepted and recognized by the laws in western countries that patients have decision-making rights regarding the end of their lives. While people can choose medical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), some may refuse it for personal, moral, social, or religious reasons. Sometimes, when treatment is futile, it is possible to make an end-of-life decision with a recommendation from a doctor. Therefore, issues that must be addressed in both ethical and Islamic terms surround end-of-life decisions. One of these issues involves Do-NotResuscitate (DNR) orders. DNR is a decision that means treatment methods are not applied to a patient when their breathing or heart has stopped for some reason. This decision is taken either because of a testament signed by the person when they were healthy or because the doctor cannot perform any curative intervention. In this study, the status and applicability of DNR orders will be investigated from an Islamic Bioethics perspective, and fatwas will be cited to clarify the status of DNR orders in Islam. Additionally, because DNR is essentially the refusal or withholding of medical treatment, the provisions of Islam concerning seeking medical treatment and withholding treatment have been extensively researched. This study aims to demonstrate that DNR instructions are Islamically applicable in cases where treatment is unnecessary, considering classical and contemporary Islamic sources.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Abdallah, Fatima S, Mahdy S Radaeda, Maram K Gaghama, and Basma Salameh. ‘Intensive Care Unit Physician’s Attitudes on Do Not Resuscitate Order in Palestine’. Indian Journal of Palliative Care 22, no. 1 (2016): 38–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.173947.
- Adams, Derrick H., and David P. Snedden. ‘How Misconceptions Among Elderly Patients Regarding Survival Outcomes of Inpatient Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Affect Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders’. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 106, no. 7 (1 July 2006): 402–4. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2006.106.7.402.
- Aksoy, Sahin, Ebru Çevik, and Zehra Edisan. ‘Yaşamın Sonunda Verilen Kararlara Ilişkin Bir Etik Tartışma’. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Ethics-Law and History 10, no. 4 (2002): 263–68.
- Al-Bar, Mohammed Ali. Khalq al-Insan bayn al-Tib wal-Qur’an. Saudi Arabia, 1995.
- Albar, Mohammed Ali. ‘Seeking Remedy, Abstaining from Therapy and Resuscitation:An Islamic Perspective’. Saudi Journalof Kidney Diseases and Transplant 18, no. 4 (2007): 629–37.
- Al-Bar, Mohammed Ali, and Hassan Chamsi-Pasha. Contemporary Bioethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18428-9.
- Al-Jawziyya, Ibn Kayyim, and Abdel Qader. The Prophetic Medicine. Egypt: Al-Mansoura: Dar al-Ghadd al-Gadeed, 2003.
- Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. ‘Islam’s Stance on Euthanasia’. Online, 2021. https://archive.islamonline.net/1005.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Din Araştırmaları
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Hatice Kubra Memis
*
0000-0003-3919-153X
United Kingdom
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
5 Nisan 2022
Kabul Tarihi
3 Ekim 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 2