Islam Hukuku Teorisinde Majāz’da Dhihn / Zihin (Bilişsel Bağlantı) Işlevini Incelemek

Öz

Simon Udo ve Michiel Leezenberg, Abd el-Kahir el-Cürcani’nin Esrar el-Belağa ve Delailü’l-İcaz adlı eserlerinin mecaz ve istiare bahsinde bilişsel dil bilimin izlerinin bulunduğunu iddia etmişlerdir. Ancak, ne Simon ne de Leezenberg iddia ettikleri bu izin, mecaz ve istiare konusuna yer veren başka klasik eserlerde bulunup bulunmadığına değinmez. Bu çalışma, Simon ve Leezenberg’un iddia ettiği bilişsel izlerin sadece Abd el-Kahir el-Cürcani’nin eserlerine hasredilemeyeceğini, aksine Hanefi usûlcülerin zihin ve mecaz ilişkinden haberdar olduklarını ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmanın savını sınırlandırmak için ve tartışmaya sundukları önemli kavramlar ve örnekler sebebiyle ağırlıklı olarak 13. ve 14. yüzyıl Hanefi usul eserlerinden yararlanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada Hanefi usûlcülerin mecaz ile zihin arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamak için kullandıkları ittisal, zihin ve mahal kavramları ele alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fıkıh usulü
• Mecaz
• İstiare
• İttisal
• Zihin

Exploring the Function of Dhihn/Zihin (Cognitive Link) in Majāz in Islamic Legal Theory

Öz

Simon Udo and Michiel Leezenberg point to the cognitive traces in the works of ‘Abd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī (d. 1078), named Asrār al-Balāgha and Dalā’il al-i‘jāz. However, neither Simon nor Leezenberg provide an insight whether these traces can be found in other classical sources, where majāz and isti‘āra are discussed. This paper argues that Simon’s and Leezenberg’s argument that the awareness of the cognitive elements in the classical Islamic approach to majāz and isti‘āra cannot be reduced in ‘Abd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī’s works. Rather, that the Hanafī legal theorists were aware of the function of dhihn/mind in the mechanism of majāz. Due to presenting a remarkable theoretical examination of the tropes and metaphors, 13th and 14th century Hanafī uṣūl al-fiqh sources are chosen. To clarify my argument, I will mainly focus on the analysis of the terminology, which expounds the relationship between majāz and mind: Such as, ittiṣāl (ilink/connection), dhihn (mind,) maḥal (space/domain).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uṣūl al-fiqh
• Majāz
• Isti‘āra
• Ittiṣāl
• Dhihn

Destekleyen Kurum

The author declared that this study has received no grant support.

Kaynakça

1. Abū ‘Ubayda. Majāz al-Qur’ān. Edited by Muhammad Fuad Sezgin, Cario: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1954.
2. Achtar, Ahmad, Sakhr. Contact between theology, hermeneutics and literary theory: The role of majāz in the interpretation of anthropomorphic verses in the Qur’ān from 2nd AH/ 8th CE until the 7th AH/13th CE.” PhD diss., SOAS University of London, 2012.
3. Adamson, Peter and Key, Alexander. “Philosophy of Language in the Medieval Arabic Tradition.” in Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language, edited Margaret Camoran and Robert J. Stainton, 74-99. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
4. Al-Bukhārī, Abdalazīz. Kashf al-Asrār ‘an Uṣūl li Fahr al-Islām Bazdawī. Istanbul: Sahāfîye-i Osmāniyye Publishing, 1890-91.
5. Al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Ahmad ibn ‘Alī. Uṣūl al-fiqh al-musammā bi al-Fuṣūl fī al-uṣūl. Edited by Nashamī, ‘Ujayl Jāsim. 2nd Edition.
6. Al-Kuwayt: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-al-Shu’ūn al-Islāmīyah, 1994.
7. Al-Jurjānī, ‘Abd al-Qāhir ‘Abd al-raḥmān b. Muḥammad. Kitāb ’Asār al-Balāgha. Edited by Maḥmūd Muḥammad Shākir. Jiddah: Dār al-madanī, 1991.
8. Al-Jurjānī, Sayyid Sharīf. Mu‘jam al-Ta‘rīfāt, edited by Muhammad Ṣiddīq al-Minshāwī. Qāhira: Dār al-faḍīla, 1982.

9. Al-Karaki, Balqis. “Dissimilar Premises, Similar Conclusions: On the Partial Rationality of Metaphor- a Comparative Study.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70, no. 1 (April 2011): 81-100.
10. Al-Sam‘ānī, Manṣūr ibn Muḥammad. Qawāti‘ al-adillah fī al-uṣūl. Edited by Muḥammad Ḥasan Muḥammad Ḥasan Ismāʻīl al-Shāfiʻī, Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 1997.
11. Al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad bin Abu Saḥl Aḥmad. Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. Edited by Abu al-Wafā al-Afghānī. Dār al-Kutub al-‘ilmiyya: Beirut, 1993.
12. Al-Sighnākī, Husām al-dīn Husein bin Alī bin Hajjāj. Al-Kāfī al-sharḥ al-bazdawī. Edited by Fakhr al-Dīn Sayyid Muhammad Qānit. Riyād: Maktabatu al-Rushd, 2001.
13. Al-Zarkashī, Muḥammad ibn Bahādur. al-Baḥr al-muḥīt fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Edited by ‘Ānī, ‘Abd al-Qādir ‘Abd Allāh, Ashqar ‘Umar Sulaymān, 1st Edition. Al-Kuwayt : Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-al-Shuʼūn al-Islāmīyah, 1992.
14. Aydın, İsmail. “Hakikat ve Mecaz’ın Terimleşme Süreci.” İslami İlimler Dergisi 8, no. 1 (Bahar 2013): 23-29.
15. Black, Max. “Metaphor.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, no. 55 (1954-1955): 273-294.
16. Black, Max. “More about Metaphor.” in Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 19-41. Second Edition, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
17. El-Cürcânî, Abdülkâhir. Delâilü’l-İ‘câz. Translated by Osman Güman. Istanbul: Litera Yayınevi, 2008. Fauconnier, Gilles, Turner, Mark. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
18. Fauconnier, Gilles. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1997.
19. Gemuhluoğlu, Zeynep. “İslâm Düşüncesine Özgü Bir Poetikadan Söz Edilebilir mi?: İlk Dönem Kelâm ve Dil Âlimlerinde Din Dili-Mecâz/Şiir-Mecâz İlişkisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” M. Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 36, no.1 (2009): 109-134.
20. Gibbs, Raymond, W. “When is Metaphor? The Idea of Understanding in Theories of Metaphor.” Poetics Today, Aspects of Metaphor Comprehension 13, no.4 (Winter 1992): 575-606.
21. Görgün, Tahsin. Sprache, Handlung und Norm: Eine Untersuchung zu “Uṣūl al-Fiqh” und “Kitāb as-Siyar” des Šams al-A’imma Muhammad b. Abī Sahl Aḥmad as-Saraḫsi (1009-1090 n. C.). Istanbul: İSAM Yayınevi, 1998.
22. Gündüzöz, Soner. “Klâsik ve Modern Arap Literatürü Açısından İslam Düşüncesinde Hakikat ve Mecaz Tartışmaları.” İslami Ilimler Dergisi 8, no. 1 (Spring 2013): 31-46.
23. Harb, Lara. “Form, Content, and the Inimitability of the Qur’an in ‘Abd al-Qahir al-Jurjānī’s Works.” Middle Eastern Literatures 18, no. 3 (2015): 301-321.
24. Heinrichs, Wolfhart. “On the Genesis of the Haqīqa-Majāz Dichotomy.” Studia Islamica, Maisonneuve & Larose, no. 59 (1984): 111-140.
25. Heinrichs, Wolfhart. “On the figurative (majâz) in Muslim interpretation and legal hermeneutics.” in Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Overlapping Inquiries, edited by Mordechai Z. Cohen and Adele Berlin, 249-265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
26. Heinrichs, Wolfhart. The Hand of the Northwind: Opinions on Metaphor and the Early Meaning of Isti‘âra in Arabic Poetics. Wiesbaden: Kommisionsverlag Franz Steiner GMBH, 1977. Ibn Malak. Sharh al-Manār wa Hawashiyya min ‘ilm al-uṣūl. Istanbul: Othmāniyya Matbaası, 1898.
27. Kalbarczyk, Nora. Sprachphilosophie in der Islamischen Rechtstheorie: Zu avicennischen Klasifikation der Bezeichnung bei Faḥr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018.
28. Kirby, John T. “Aristotle on Metaphor.” The American Journal of Philology 118, no.4 (Winter 1997): 517-554.
29. Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By With a New Afterword. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
30. Lakoff, George. “The Contemporary theory of metaphor.” in Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 202-251. 2nd Edition, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
31. Leezenberg, Michiel. Contexts of Metaphor. 1st Edition. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2001.
32. Levin, Samuel R. “Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 15, no. 1 (Winter 1982): 24-46.
33. Modaressi, Hossein. “Some Recent Analyses of the Concept of majāz in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 106, no. 4 (Oct.-Dec. 1986): 787-791.
34. Murteza, Bedir. “Al-Jaṣṣāṣ (d. 370/981)” in Islamic Legal Thought A Compendium of Muslim Jurists, edited by Oussama Arabi, David S. Powers and Susan A. Spectorsky, 147-166.
35. Leiden-Boston: Brill Publishing, 2013. Oliveri, Simona. “Early Arabic grammar: sources and codification.” in Dal Medio all’Estremo Oriente, edited by Marina Miranda and Raffaele Torella e Mario Casari, 63-74. Roma: Carocci Editore, 2018.
36. Ortony, Andrew. “Metaphor, language and thought.” in Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 1-16. 2nd Edition, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1993.
37. Özdemir, Ibrahim. İslam Düşüncesinde Dil ve Varlık Vaz’ İlminin Temel Meseleleri. Istanbul: İz Publishing, 2006.
38. Richards, I. A. Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.
39. Salama, Mohammad. The Qur’an and Modern Literary Critisim: From Taha to Nasr. London: Bloomsbury Academic/ Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.
40. Şensoy, Sedat. “Belağat Geleneğinde Aklî Mecâz Tartışmaları (The Discussions about Majāz al-‘Aqlī in ‘ilm al-Balāgha).” İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 8 (1986): 1-37.
41. Shah, Mustafa. “The Philological Endeavours of the Early Arabic Linguists: Theological Implications of the tawqf-iil Antithesis and the majaz Controversy/Part 1.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, Edinburgh University Press 1, no. 1 (2002): 43-66.
42. Simon, Udo. “Majâz.” Encyclopaedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, Leiden: Brill, 2008.
43. Simon, Udo. “Isti‘âra.” Encyclopaedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, Leiden: Brill, 2008.
44. Taverniers, Miriam. Metaphor and metaphorology a selective genealogy of philosophical and linguistic conceptions of metaphor from Aristotle to the 1990s. Belgium: Academia Press, 2002.
45. Türcan, Selim. “Mecâz Teriminin Gelisim Surecinde el-Ferrâ’nın Yeri.” Gazi Üniversitesi Çorum İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 2, no. 4 (2003): 89-122.
46. Türker, Ömer. Seyyid Şerif Cürcani’nin Tevil Anlayışı: Yorumun Metafizik, Mantıki ve Dilbilimsel Temelleri. PhD diss., University of Marmara, 2006.
47. Vishanoff, David R. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics How Sunni Legal Theorist Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society, 2011.
48. Wansbourgh, John. “Majaz al-Quran: Periphrastic exegesis.” BSOAS, no. 33 (1970): 247-66.
49. Weiss, Bernard. “‘Ilm al-waḍ‘: An Introductory Account of a Later Muslim Philological Science.” Arabica, no. 3 (November 1987): 339-356.
50. Yaşar, Hakime Reyyan. “Marriage, Metaphor, and Law: Exploring Wive’s Anomalous Legal Status in the Classical Islamic Marriage Contract.” PhD diss., School of Advanced Studies, University of London, 2018.
51. Yerinde, Adem. “Mecâz’ul Kur’ân’ı Çerçevesinde Ebû Ubeyde’nin Tefsirciliği.” Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 19 (2009): 151-189.
52. Yerlikaya, Ünal. “Hanafî Düşüncede Hakîkat-Mecâz İlişkisinin Kavranış Biçimine Etkisi Bakımından Sebep-İllet-Hüküm İlişkisi.” Sülayman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 1, no. 30 (2018): 48-70.