Yuhanna Çalışmalarının Odak Haritasını Çıkarmak: Modern Araştırmalar Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2, 471 - 490, 30.12.2023

Bilal Patacı

https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2023.34.2.1291812

Öz

Dört İncil arasında en çok çalışılan metin Dördüncü İncil olarak da bilinen Yuhanna İncili’dir. Yuhanna çalışmaları farklı metotlar, sorular ve cevaplarla oldukça üretken bir akademik alandır. Yirminci yüzyılın başından itibaren 1000’in üzerinde müstakil eser yayınlanmıştır. Üstelik bu eserlerin yüzde yirmisi son 25 yıla aittir. Kabaca son iki yüzyıla bakıldığında Yuhanna İncili üzerine teoloji dışında başta dinler tarihi olmak üzere tarih, psikoloji, sosyoloji, edebiyat ve paleografi gibi farklı alanlarda yapılan çalışmaların oldukça verimli bir literatür oluşturduğu fark edilmektedir. Alanın sahip olduğu çok disiplinli araştırma yelpazesi metodolojik çeşitliliği de beraberinde getirmiştir. Yakın gelecekte Yuhanna çalışmalarının önemini koruyacağı ve hatta artıracağı rahatlıkla söylenebilir. Geriye doğru bakıldığında ise Yuhanna çalışmalarının oldukça renkli bir panoramaya sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı, geçtiğimiz yüzyılda Yuhanna çalışmalarının yöntem ve araştırma odaklarındaki değişimin izini sürerek bu panoramik fotoğrafın analizini yapmaktır. Bu doğrultuda, Dördüncü İncil özelinde yapılan çalışmaların tarihsel eleştiriden edebi eleştiriye uzanan metodolojik çizgisini, araştırma odakları olan evanjelist/İncil yazarı, Yuhanna cemaati ve İncil metni üzerinden göstermeye çalışacağız.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yuhanna çalışmaları, Dördüncü İncil, Tarihsel kritik, Edebi kritik, İncil yazarı, Yuhanna cemaati

Making the Focal Map of Johannine Studies: A Survey of Modern Scholarship

Öz

The most studied text the four gospels is the Gospel of John, which is also known as the Fourth Gospel. Academics have been prolific in their study of it, using many different methods and coming up with numerous questions and answers related to the text. From the beginning of the 20th century alone, over 1000 individual works on this gospel have been published. Moreover, twenty percent of these belong to the last 25 years. Surveying the literature over the last two centuries, one notices studies on the Gospel of John in different fields such as history, psychology, sociology, literature, and palaeography. It is particularly of note to observe that, apart from theology, the history of religions constitutes a very productive literature on this gospel. Such a multidisciplinary research spectrum as this has brought with it methodological diversity. It might easily be expected that in the near future Johannine studies will maintain and even increase their importance. Looking back from the point reached, one can already observe the rather colourful panorama that these studies display. The aim of this article is to analyse this panoramic picture by tracing the changes in the methodology and research focus of Johannine studies over the past century. Accordingly, we will try to show the methodological line of Johannine studies from historical to literary criticism through the foci of research, which are the evangelist, the Johannine community, and the text of John.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Johannine studies, Fourth Gospel, Historical criticism, Literary criticism, Evangelist, Johannine community

Kaynakça

• Adam, A.K.M. Making Sense of New Testament Theology: ‘Modern’ Problems and Prospects. Studies in American Biblical Hermeneutics. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2005. google scholar
• Aland, Kurt, and Barbara Aland. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Translated by Erroll F. Rhodes. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995. google scholar
• Anderson, Paul N. ‘Beyond the Shade of the Oak Tree: The Recent Growth of Johannine Studies’. The Expository Times 119, no. 8 (2008): 365-73. google scholar
• ———. ‘John and Qumran: Discovery and Interpretation over Sixty Years’. In John, Qumran, and the Dead Sea Scrolls : Sixty Years of Discovery and Debate, edited by Mary L. Coloe and Tom Thatcher. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2011. google scholar
• Ashton, John. Studying John: Approaches to the Fourth Gospel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. google scholar
• ———. Understanding the Fourth Gospel. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991. google scholar
• Barrett, C. K. The Gospel According to St John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text. London: SPCK, 1978. google scholar
• Bauckham, Richard. ‘For Whom Were the Gospels Written?’ In The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences, edited by Richard Bauckham. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998. google scholar
• ———. The Christian World Around the New Testament: Collected Essays II. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017. google scholar
• Black, Matthew. An Aramaic Approach to the Gospel and Acts. Oxford University Press, 1967. google scholar
• Brown, Raymond E. An Introduction to the Gospel of John. Edited by F.J. Moloney. New York: Doubleday, 2003. google scholar
• ———. The Community of the Beloved Disciple. London: Goeffrey Chapman Book, 1979. google scholar
• ———. The Gospel According to John. New York: Doubleday, 1966. google scholar
• Bultmann, R. ‘On the Problem of Demythologizing’. In New Testament Mythology and Other Basic Writings, translated by S.M. Ogden, 95-130. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984. google scholar
• ———. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1971. google scholar
• Burney, C.F. The Aramaic Origin of the Fourth Gospel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1922. google scholar
• Carson, Donald A. The Gospel According to John. Michigan: Apollos, 1971. google scholar
• Carter, W. John and Empire: Initial Explorations. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2008. google scholar
• Cirafesi, Wally V. ‘The Johannine Community Hypothesis (1968-Present): Past and Present Approaches and a New Way Forward’. Currents in Biblical Research 12, no. 2 (2014): 173-93. google scholar
• Culpepper, R.Alan. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983. google scholar
• Dodd, Caharles H. Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge University Press, 1963. google scholar
• Duke, Paul D. Irony in the Fourth Gospel. Theology Today. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1985. google scholar
• Felix Just, S.J. ‘Combining Key Methodologies in 355 Johannine Studies’. In What We Have Heard from the Beginning: The Past, Present, and Future of Johannine Studies, edited by Tom Thatcher, 355-58. Texas: Baylor University Press, 2007. google scholar
• Frey, Jörg. ‘The Impact of the Dead Sea Scrolls on New Testament Interpretation: Proposals, Problems, and Further Perspectives’. In The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The Princeton Symposium on the Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by James H. Charlesworth. Texas: Baylor University Press, 2006. google scholar
• Gardner-Smith, P. Saint John and the Synoptic Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938. google scholar
• Gerdmar, Anders. Roots of Theological Anti-Semiticism: German Biblical Interpretation and the Jews, from Herder and Semler to Kittel and Bultmann. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2009. google scholar
• Hengel, Martin. Johannine Question. London-New York: SCM Press, Trinity Press International, 1989. google scholar
• Hitchcock, F.R.M. A Fresh Study of the Fourth Gospel. Eugene, OR: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1911. google scholar
• Keener, Craig S., The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 2003. google scholar
• Kysar, Robert. ‘Community and Gospel: Vectors in Fourth Gospel Criticism’. Interpretation, no. 31 (1977). google scholar
• Lake, Kirsopp. An Introduction to the New Testament. London: Christophers, 1938. google scholar
• Lincoln, Andrew T. The Gospel According to Saint John. Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: Continuum, 2005. google scholar
• Lindars, Barnabas. Behind the Fourth Gospel. Studies in Creative Criticism. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2010. google scholar
• ———. The Gospel of John. New Century Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co., 1995. google scholar
• Lozada, Francisco. ‘Social Location and Johannine Scholarship: Looking Ahead’. In New Currents Through John: A Global Perspective, edited by Francisco Lozada and Tom Thatcher, 183-97. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006. google scholar
• Malina, Bruce. ‘The Gospel of John in Sociolinguistic Perspective’. In Protocol of the 48th Colloquy. Berkeley: Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture, 1984. google scholar
• Martyn, J. Louis. History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel. Louisville-London: Westminster John Knox Press, 1968. google scholar
• Matill, A. J. ‘Johannine Communities Behind the Fourth Gospel: Georg Richter’s Analysis’. Theological Studies 38, no. 2 (1977): 294-315. google scholar
• McGrath, James F. ‘Johannine Christianity: Jewish Christianity?’ Koinonia 8, no. 1 (1996): 1-20. google scholar
• Meeks, Wayne. ‘The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism’. Journal of Biblical Literature 91, no. 1 (1972): 44-72. google scholar
• ———. ‘The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism’. Journal of Biblical Literature, no. 91 (1972). google scholar
• Menzies, Allan, ed. ‘Origen’s Commentary on the Gospel of John’. In The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325. New York: The Christian Literature Company, 1896. google scholar
• Morris, Leon. The Gospel According to John. Michigan: Eerdmans, 1971. google scholar
• Neirynck, Frans. ‘John and the Synoptics’. In L’evangile de Jean. Leuven: Leuven University, 1977. google scholar
• Neyrey, Jerome. An Ideology of Revolt. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988. google scholar
• Nielsen, Helga Kjar. ‘Johannine Researches’. In New Readings on John, edited by Johannes Nissen and and Sigfred Pedersen, 11-30. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999. google scholar
• Orsini, Pasquale, and Clarisse Willy. ‘Early New Testament Manuscripts and Their Dates: A Critique of Theological Palaeography’. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 88, no. 4 (2012): 443-74. google scholar
• Pagels, E.H. The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: Heracleon’s Commentary on John. Monograph Series - Society of Biblical Literature. Scholars Press, 1989. google scholar
• Patacı, Bilal. Sembolizm ve Kristoloji: Yuhanna İncili’nde İsa Tasviri. İstanbul: MilelNihal Yayınları, 2022. google scholar
• Richter, G. ‘Prasentische Und Futurische Eschatologie Im 4. Evangelium’,. In Gegenwart Und Kommendes Reich: Schülergabe Anton Vögtle Zum 65, edited by Peter Fiedler und Dieter Zeller. Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1975. google scholar
• --. ‘Prasentische Und Futurische Eschatologie Im 4. Evangelium’. In Studien Zum Johannesevangelium, 1977. google scholar
• Robinson, John A. T. ‘The New Look’. In Twelve New Testament Studies. SCM Press, 1962. google scholar
• Schnackenburg, Rudolf. The Gospel According to St. John. Translated by David. Vol. 3. London: Burns & Oates, 1982. google scholar
• Schnelle, Udo. Das Evangelium Nach Johannes. Theologischer Handkommentar Zum Neuen Testament 4. Leipzig: Evangelischer Verlagsanstalt, 1998. google scholar
• Segovia, F.F., ed. What Is John?: Literary and Social Readings of the Fourth Gospel. Vol. 2. SBL Symposium Series. Scholars Press, 1996. google scholar
• ———, ed. What Is John?: Readers and Readings of the Fourth Gospel. Vol. 1. SBL Symposium Series. Scholars Press, 1996. google scholar
• Sloyan, Gerard S. What Are They Saying About John. New York: Paulist Press, 1991. google scholar
• Smith, D. Moody. ‘Johannine Studies since Bultmann’. Word & World 21, no. 4 (2001): 343-51. google scholar
• ———. ‘John and the Synoptics: Some Dimensions of the Problem’. New Testament Studies, no. 26 (1980). google scholar
• Smith, D.M. Johannine Christianity: Essays on Its Setting, Sources and Theology. London-New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2006. google scholar
• Stibbe, Mark W. G. The Gospel of John as Literature: An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Perspectives. Leiden: EJ Brill, 1993. google scholar
• Thatcher, Tom. ‘The New Current through John: The Old “New Look” and the New Critical Orthodoxy’. In New Current Through John, edited by Fancisco Lozada and Tom Thatcher, 1-26. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006. google scholar
• Urban C. von Wahlde. ‘The Road Ahead—Three Aspects of Johannine Scholarship’. In What We Have Heard from the Beginning: The Past, Present, and Future of Johannine Studies, edited by Tom Thatcher, 343-54. Texas: Baylor University Press, 2007. google scholar