THE SYRIAN REFUGEE CRISIS and the EUROPEAN UNION CONDITIONALITY
Öz
The aim of this study is to advocate the idea that the European Union (EU) should develop a new refugee policy which is appropriate to human security and impose this policy under the conditionality principle to the countries which are engaged to EU by negotiating, candidacy or Stability and Association Aggrements (SAAs). Especially with the start of the civil war in Syria, the situation that EU could not manage the refugee crisis that firstly Turkey and then the Western Balkan countries faced, caused serious political crises. In particular, Turkey and Macedonia were the most affected countries within all the candidates. Moreover the refugee crisis has created a serious discussion within EU members, besides the existing fault lines, the impact of the crisis was influentially connected to the Brexit demand in UK, and then the future expectations of EU.
The basic claim of the paper is, the discussion about the refugee issues will create a need for a transformation in EU's security strategy. One may suggest that EU firstly should determine a wider common policy on refugees, secondly under the conditionality principle, EU should develop her acquis towards candidate countries compatible with the new common refugee policy.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- A European Way of Security The Madrid Report of the Human Security Study Group comprising a Proposal and Background Report Madrid, 8th November, 2007, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/40207/1/A_European_Way_of_Security%28author%29.pdf.
- A Secure Europe in a Better World, European Securıty Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf.
- Bülent Sarper Ağır, Barış Gürsoy and Murat Necip Arman, European Perspective of Human Security and the Western Balkans, Revista de Ştiinţe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques, No. 50, pp. 41-54, 2016.
- EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service, A Global Strategy on foreign and security policy, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/580902/EPRS_BRI(2016)580902_EN.pdf European Commission, European Agenda on Migration 2015 – four pillars to better manage migration, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/docs/summary_european_agenda_on_migration_en.pdf. Frenkler, U. (2001), ‘Germany at Maastricht: power politics or Civilian Power ?’, in Harnisch, S. and Maull, H.W. (eds.), Germany as a Civilian Power ? The foreign policy of the Berlin Republic, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 26-48.
- FRONTEX, http://frontex.europa.eu/trends-and-routes/western-balkan-route/
- Harnisch, S. and Maull, H.W. (2001), ‘Introduction’, in Harnisch, S. and Maull, H.W. (eds.), Germany as a Civilian Power? The foreign policy of the Berlin Republic, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 1-10, 2001.
- Ian Manners, Normative power Europe reconsidered: beyond the crossroads, Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 182-199, 2006.
- Ian Manners, Normative Power Europe Reconsidered. Paper presented at the CIDEL Workshop, ‘From Civilian to Military Power: The European Union at a Crossroads?’, Oslo, 2004. http://www.arena.uio.no/cidel/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Manners.pdf,
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Siyaset Bilimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Murat Necip Arman
ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, NAZİLLİ İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER BÖLÜMÜ
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Ekim 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
31 Temmuz 2017
Kabul Tarihi
12 Eylül 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2