Deniz Alanlarının Sınırlandırılması Süreci

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 415 - 475, 24.04.2020

Çağatay Erciyes Murat Sümer

Öz

Uluslararası sınırlandırma hukukunun yegâne amacı hakkaniyete uygun bir çözüme ulaşılmasıdır. İlgili uluslararası sözleşmeler, uluslararası teamül hukuku ve uluslararası içtihatlar ile Devlet uygulamaları ışığında, bu makale Deniz Yetki Alanı Sınırlandırmasında hakkaniyete uygun bir sonuç elde edilmesi gerektiği hususunu irdelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Halihazırda, deniz sınırlandırmasının hakkaniyete uygun ilkeler çerçevesin de yapılması gerektiğine ilişkin hiçbir tereddüt bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deniz Yetki Alanı Sınırlandırması, Hakkaniyete Uygun Çözüm, Münhasır Ekonomik Bölge, Kıta Sahanlığı, Ortak Geliştirme, Deniz Yetki Alanları

Maritime Boundary Delimitation Process

Öz

Achieving an equitable result is the single consideration prescribed by international maritime delimitation law. This article aims to analyze the requirement of achieving an equitable result in the Maritime Boundary Delimitation process in the light of relevant international conventions, customary international law, international jurisprudence and State practice. At present, there is no doubt that maritime delimitation should be governed by equitable principles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Equitable Result, Exclusive Economic Zone, Continental Shelf, Joint Development, Maritime Jurisdiction Areas

Kaynakça

• Anastasia Strati et al, Unresolved Issues and New Challenges to the Law of the Sea (Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006).
• Barbara Kwiatkowska, ‘Equitable maritime boundary delimitation, as exemplified in the work of the international court of justice during the presidency of Sir Robert Yewdall Jennings and Beyond’ (1997) 28(2) Ocean Development & International Law 91.
• Chris Carleton, Maritime Delimitation in Complex Island Situations - A Case Study on the Caribbean Sea Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden Netherlands 2006).
• D. C. Kapoor and Adam Kerr, A Guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation (London, Sweet & Maxwell 1986).
• David Harris, Cases and Materials on International Law (7th edn, Sweet and Maxwell 2012).
• David Joseph Attard and others (ed), The IMLI Manual on International Maritime Law, Volume I: The Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2014).
• David Joseph Attard, ‘Mediterranean Maritime Jurisdictional Claims: A Review’ in Jurgen Basedow (ed), The Hamburg Lectures on Maritime Affairs (Springer 2010).
• David Joseph Attard, The Exclusive Economic Zone in International Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1987).
• Deniz Bölükbaşı, Turkey and Greece, The Aegean Disputes: A Unique Case in International Law, (Rutledge-Cavendish, 2012).
• Hiran W. Jayewardene, The Regime of Islands in International Law (Leiden Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1990).
• James Crawford, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press 2012).
• Malcolm Shaw, International Law (7th edn, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2014).
• Masahiro Miyoshi, Considerations of Equity in the Settlement of Territorial and Boundary Disputes (London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1993).
• Masahiro Miyoshi, The Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas in Relation to Maritime Boundary Delimitation (University of Durham 1999).
• Myron Nordquist and others, The Regulation of CS Development (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013).
• Nelson L. D. M. ‘The Role of Equity in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries’ (1990) 84(4) The American Journal of International Law 837.
• Niels Andersen and others, ‘International Boundary Disputes: An unfinished tale of Geology, Technology, Money, Law, History, Politics and Diplomacy’ (Texas, Offshore Technology Conference 2014) https://www.academia.edu/9497435/International_Boundary_Disputes_An_unfinished_tale_of_Geology_Technology_Money_Law_History_Politics_and_Diplomacy as of 20.04.2015.
• Nugzar Dundua, ‘Delimitation of maritime boundaries between adjacent States’ (UN 2007) http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/dundua_0607_georgia.pdf as of 20.04.2015.
• Nuno Marques Antunes, Towards the Conceptualization of Maritime Delimitation (Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003).
• Owen McIntyre, Utilization and Environmental Protection of Shared International Freshwater Resources – The Role of Equity (Ireland, University College Cork 2013).
• Prosper Weil, The Law of Maritime Delimitation – Reflections (Cambridge, Grotuis Publications 1989).
• Robin Churchill and Vaughan Lowe, The Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Manchester University Press 1999).
• Seoung-Yung Hong and Jon M. Van Dyke, Maritime Boundary Disputes, Settlement Processes and the Law of the Sea (Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publications 2009).
• Shideru Oda, Fifty Years of the Law of the Sea (Kluwer Law International 2003).
• UN Doc, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs; Digest of International Cases on the Law of the Sea (New York, United Nations Publications 2007).
• UN Doc, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs; Digest of International Cases on the Law of the Sea, United Nations Publications, New York, 2007.
• UN Doc, Handbook on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs (New York, United Nations Publications 2000).
• Vasco Becker-Weinberg, Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Law of the Sea (Hamburg, Springer 2014).
• Yoshifumu Tanaka, ‘Reflections on Maritime Delimitations in the Cameroon Nigeria Case’ (2004) 53(2) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 396.
• Yoshifumu Tanaka, Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation (Oregon, Oxford and Portland 2006).
• Yoshifumu Tanaka, The International Law of the Sea (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2012).