Kalsiyum Silikat Simanların Cam İyonomer Esaslı Materyallerle Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımının Karşılaştırılmalı Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kalsiyum silikat esaslı MTA ve Biodentin materyallerinin üzerine uygulanan rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman (RMCİS) ve geleneksel cam iyonomerrestoratif materyalin (GCİR) makaslama bağlanma dayanımdeğerlerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak araştırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: MTA (n=24) ve Biodentin (n=24) materyal örnekleri, 5 mm çapındaki ve 2 mm derinliğindeki metal kalıplar kullanılarak hazırlandı ve akrilik bloklara gömüldü.Her iki materyal için hazırlanan örnekler RMCİS (Fuji II) ve GCİR (Voco Inonofil) alt gruplarına eşit (n=12) ve randomize olacak şekilde ayrıldı. Restoratif materyaller iç çapı 2 mm ve yüksekliği 2 mm olan silindir şekilli plastik tüpler aracılığıylaMTA ve Biodentin örneklerinin merkezine yerleştirildi.Makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerleri universal test cihazı ile ölçüldü ve veriler MPa cinsinden kaydedildi. Veriler Mann-Whitney U testi ile analiz edildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık değeri 0,05 olarak alındı. Bulgular: MTA üzerine uygulanan RMCİS’in makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerleri, GCİR’e göre istatistiksel anlamlıfarklılıkla daha yüksekti (p<0,003). Biodentin üzerine uygulanan RMCİS’in ortalama bağlanma dayanım değerleri ise, GCİR’e göre daha yüksek olmakla birlikte, bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi (p=0,057). Hem RMCİShem de CGİR kullanımında, MTA ve Biodentin arasında makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerleri bakımından anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilmedi (sırasıyla p=0,133 ve p=0,273). Sonuçlar: Çalışmaya dahil edilen tüm bağlanma kombinasyonları özelinde, MTA üzerine uygulanan RMCİS örnekleri en yüksek makaslama bağlanma dayanımınısergiledi. Biodentin üzerine uygulanan CGİR ise en zayıf kombinasyon olarak tespit edildi. Elde edilen sonuçlar bazında, MTA ve Biodentin üzerine RMCİS uygulanmasının daha güçlü mekanik bağlanmayı sağlamış olup, klinik öneriler sunulabilmesi ve bu sonuçların doğrulanması için ileri çalışmaların uygulanması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• MTA
• Biodentin
• Cam İyonomer Siman
• Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımı

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma yalnızca ticari dental materyaller üzerinde gerçekleştirilen in vitro bir deneysel çalışma olduğundan, insan veya hayvan deneği içermemekte ve etik kurul onayı gerektirmemektedir.

Comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength between different calcium silicate cements and glass ionomer-based materials

Öz

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare shear bond strength (SBS) values of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer restorative (CGIR) applied on calcium silicate-based MTA and Biodentin materials. METHOD: MTA (n=24) and Biodentin (n=24) material samples were prepared using metal moulds with a diameter of 5 mm and a depth of 2 mm and embedded in acrylic blocks. The samples of MTA and Biodentin were randomly assigned to RMGIC (Fuji II) and CGIR (Voco Inonofil) subgroups in equal (n=12). Restorative materials were placed at the centre of MTA and Biodentin using cylindrical plastic tubes (2 mm × 2 mm). SBS values were measured using a universal testing machine and recorded in MPa. The data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance level was set at 0.05. RESULTS: SBS values of RMGIC applied to MTA were significantly higher than CGIR (p<0.003). Mean SBS values of RMGIC applied to Biodentin were higher than those of CGIR; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.057). Also, no significant difference was detected in SBS values between MTA and Biodentin when using both RMGIC and CGIR (p=0.133 and p=0.273, respectively). CONCLUSION: For all combinations in the current study, RMGIC samples applied to MTA showed the highest SBS. CGIR applied to Biodentin was found as the weakest combination. Based on the results obtained, the application of RMGIC on MTA and Biodentin has provided more acceptable mechanical bonding. Further studies are recommended to confirm these results and to provide clinical recommendations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• MTA
• GIS
• Biodentin
• Shear Bond Strength

Etik Beyan

Since this study is an in vitro experimental study conducted only on commercial dental materials, it does not involve human or animal subjects and does not require ethical committee approval.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Dong X, Xu X. Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(3): 354.
2. 2. Niu LN, Jiao K, Wang TD, Zhang W, Camilleri J, Bergeron BE, et al. A review of the bioactivity of hydraulic calcium silicate cements. J Dent. 2014; 42(5): 517-533.
3. 3. Eskandari F, Razavian A, Hamidi R, Yousefi K, Borzou S. An Updated Review on Properties and Indications of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements in Endodontic Therapy. Int J Dent. 2022; 2022: 6858088.
4. 4. Ha WN, Nicholson T, Kahler B, Walsh LJ. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate—A Review of Properties and Testing Methodologies. Materials. 2017; 10(11): 1261.
5. 5. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010; 36(3): 400-413.
6. 6. Ravi H, Mahendran K, Velusamy V, Babu S. Biodentine-a review on its properties and clinical applications. JBPR. 2021;10.
7. 7. Tziafas D, Smith A, Lesot H. Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy. J Dent. 2000; 28(2): 77-92.
8. 8. Arandi NZ, Rabi T. Cavity bases revisited. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020: 305-312.

9. 9. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016; 7(3): 16.
10. 10. Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24(5): 423-429.
11. 11. Cushley S, Duncan H, Lappin M, Chua P, Elamin A, Clarke M, et al. Efficacy of direct pulp capping for management of cariously exposed pulps in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2021; 54(4): 556-571.
12. 12. Yesilyurt C, Yildirim T, Taşdemir T, Kusgoz A. Shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bound to mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2009; 35(10): 1381-1383.
13. 13. Gulati S, Shenoy VU, Margasahayam SV. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer to conditioned and unconditioned mineral trioxide aggregate surface: An: in vitro: study. Conserv Dent Endod. 2014; 17(5): 440-443.
14. 14. Ergül R, Aksu S, Çalışkan S, Tüloğlu N. Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to glass ionomers. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1): 140.
15. 15. Tulumbaci F, Almaz ME, Arikan V, Mutluay MS. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Conserv Dent Endod. 2017; 20(5): 292-296.
16. 16. Cantekin K, Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22(4): 302-306.
17. 17. Kenchappa M, Nagaveni N, Kashetty B. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of methacrylate-based composite, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and Fuji IX glass ionomer cement with Biodentine as a base. CODS-J Dent. 2021; 11(2): 40-43.
18. 18. Meraji N, Camilleri J. Bonding over dentin replacement materials. J Endod. 2017; 43(8): 1343-1349.
19. 19. Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, Batra M, Saini M. MTA versus Biodentine: review of literature with a comparative analysis. JCDR. 2017; 11(8): ZG01.
20. 20. Kim JR, Nosrat A, Fouad AF. Interfacial characteristics of Biodentine and MTA with dentine in simulated body fluid. J Dent. 2015; 43(2): 241-247.
21. 21. Demarco FF, Rosa MS, Tarquínio SB, Piva E. Influence of the restoration quality on the success of pulpotomy treatment: a preliminary retrospective study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005; 13(1): 72-77.
22. 22. Sadaf D. Success of Coronal Pulpotomy in Permanent Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis: An Evidence-based Review. Cureus. 2020; 12(1): e6747.
23. 23. Cushley S, Duncan HF, Lappin MJ, Chua P, Elamin AD, Clarke M, et al. Efficacy of direct pulp capping for management of cariously exposed pulps in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2021; 54(4): 556-571.