Affect, Architecture and Water: Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature

Öz

Effects of water in the space is the subject of study in many scientific fields. The research question is that whether the water features are included in the studies carried out the intersection of affect and architecture. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the literature regarding the concepts of affect-architecture-water and to determine the concepts in current research areas and the primary authors. The scope of this study consists of documents in Scopus database. The keywords “Affect, Affective, Architecture, Water” were selected for the systematically analysed scan made in Scopus database. Scanning was done by creating three different combinations with the selected keywords. First combination is “Affect” and “Architecture; Second combination is “Affective” and “Architecture”; Third combination is “Affect”, “Architecture” and “Water”. After collecting the bibliometric data of a total of 1557 documents according to three different combinations from the database on November 21, 2022, the downloaded data files were transferred to the VOSviewer (1.6.18.0) software. Bibliometric analysis with science mapping techniques was applied to the dataset by the VOSviewer. Firstly, Scopus analysis search results were examined. Secondly, Visuals were created by science mapping techniques. As a result, nine concepts and 26 authors were determined. The concepts for the gaps are “Architecture, Affect, Atmosphere, Perception, Space, Sensory Experience, Architectural Design, Built Environment, Emotion”. The authors are “Deleuze, Guattari, Davidson, Anderson, Barrett, Damasio, Kraftl, Lyubomirsky, Manzo, Massumi, P. L. Russell, Wigley, Scherer, J. A. Russell, Böhme, Abusaada, Matteis, Bachelard, Merleau-Ponty, Pallasmaa, Plutchik, Watson, Zumthor, Lefebvre, Sørensen, Ebbensgaard”.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Affect
• Architecture
• Water
• Bibliometrics
• VOSviewer

Destekleyen Kurum

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif University Research Projects Coordination Unit and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).

Teşekkür

This study is an output of the research project entitled “Biyofilik Yaklaşımla Suyun Mekânda Algısal ve Duygulanımsal Boyutları: Çağdaş Mimarlık Örnekleri”. This work has been supported by Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif University Research Projects Coordination Unit under grant number "2022B1Ç05D". This study is an output of the research project entitled “Çağdaş Mimarlık Örneklerinde Biyofilik Öğe Olarak Suyun Algısal ve Duygulanımsal Yönlerinin İncelenmesi”. This work has been supported by 1002–B Emergency Support Module of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)under grant number “222K102”.

Kaynakça

1. Abusaada, H. (2020). Strengthening the affectivity of atmospheres in urban environments: The toolkit of multi-sensory experience. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(3), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/ ARCH-03-2020-0039
2. Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005
3. Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369303600107
4. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12 (5–6), 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
5. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
6. Ding, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and Cite Space. Electronic Commerce Research, 22, 787-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
7. Ebbensgaard, C. L. (2017). ‘I like the sound of falling water, it’s calming’: Engineering sensory experiences through landscape architecture. Cultural Geographies, 24(3), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017698719
8. Güney, İ., & Somuncu, M. (2020). Turizm coğrafyasında yeni eğilimler: bibliyometrik göstergeler üzerinden bir ağ analizi. Aegean Geographical Journal, 29(2), 297-319. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ecd/issue/58525/789323

9. Karagöz, D., & Savaş, N. (2021). Turizmde kültürel miras araştırmalarının haritalandırılması. Journal of Gastronomy, Hospitality and Travel, 4(2), 258-281. https://doi.org/10.33083/joghat.2021.73
10. Kokol, P., & Blažun Vošner, H. (2019). Historical, descriptive and exploratory analysis of application of bibliometrics in nursing research. Nursing outlook, 67(6), 680–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.04.009
11. Kraftl, P., & Adey, P. (2008). Architecture/affect/inhabitation: geographies of being-in buildings. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(1), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600701734687
12. Kurutkan, M. N., & Orhan, F. (2018). Sağlık politikası konusunun bilim haritalama teknikleri ile analizi. İKSAD Publishing House.
13. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 11– 131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
14. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2005.01.002
15. Matteis, F. D. (2020). Affective spaces: Architecture and the living body (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087656
16. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433- 443. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6%3C433::AID-ASI11%3E3.0.CO;2-Q
17. Özkaraca, N., & Halaç, H. H. (2022). Tarihi çevrede sürdürülebilirlik konulu lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 15(1), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.988202
18. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
19. Peritz, B. C. (1988). Bibliometric literature: a quantitative analysis. In L. Egghe, & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88: Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval (165-173). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
20. Santos, R., Costa, A. A., & Grilo, A. M. (2017). Bibliometric analysis and review of building information modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Automation in Construction, 80, 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005
21. Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
22. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
23. Sørensen, T. F. (2015). More than a feeling: Towards an archaeology of atmosphere. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. emospa.2013.12.009
24. Şen, Ö. (2020). Bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile ağızdan ağıza iletişim (Wom) konusunun incelenmesi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(54), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1919
25. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
26. Xiao, Z., Qin, Y., Xu, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2022). The journal buildings: a bibliometric analysis (2011–2021). Buildings, 12(1), 37. https://doi. org/10.3390/buildings12010037