Öz
This study aims to evaluate the academic endevours of an American researcher, Tayeb el-Hibri, who approaches to the ʿAbbāsid Islamic historiography from the perspective of literary analysis. The first part briefly touches upon some works of Western scholars who try to apply literary criticism developed in the West with the aim of revealing the nature and basic forms of written works, to the classical sources of Islamic history. The second part provides with a brief information about his academic studies, and then evaluates the conclusions he has reached on the nature of the sources about the early ʿAbbāsid caliphate through literary analysis. Hibri contends that a methodology that goes beyond paradigms of both philological and historical criticism is needed to reconstruct the thought world of the medieval Muslim historians and to recognize their literary achievements. Following this line of thought, in his two important masterpieces, he deals with the khabars/reports, used as the most basic agents in the construction of historical fact in Islamic historiography, as a discourse, and tries to examine the interactive process of how the individual reports/khabars are transformed into a coherent narrative. He argues that medieval Islamic historians tried to interpret the past with coherent narratives they created depending on the social, historical and economic conditions of the period in which they lived, while using a series of complex stylistic forms such as metaphor, allusion, pun and irony.