A Thematic Analysis of Action Research in Initial Teacher Education: Reflections and Future Directions

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 54, 1314 - 1328, 28.12.2022

Eda Ceylan , İrem Çomoğlu

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1169772

Cited By: 1

Öz

This systematic literature review aims to gain a comprehensive understanding of the opportunities that
action research (AR) provides for initial teacher education and the challenges that teacher educators and
pre-service teachers (PSTs) may experience during the AR process. We analyzed 20 empirical studies on
AR conducted in initial teacher education programs, adopting a hybrid approach to thematic analysis. The
findings indicate that AR is a promising practice that helps PSTs to reflect critically, (re)construct their
teacher identity, see students as partners, value collaboration, and (re)conceptualize their understanding of
research. However, it is also important to consider the challenges faced during the AR process, such as
practicum restrictions, assessment demands, weak communication between partners, and time constraints.
Therefore, it is essential to consider AR within initial teacher education as distinct from in-service AR
practices since the needs and concerns of PSTs might be different in this transitional period of their
lives. Implications are included for initial teacher education programs which are planning to use AR as a
tool for teacher learning and development

Anahtar Kelimeler

Action research, pre-service teacher education, opportunities, challenges

Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitiminde Eylem Araştırmasının Tematik Bir Analizi: Yansımalar ve Gelecek Yönelimler

Öz

Bu sistematik alanyazın taramasının amacı, eylem araştırmasının hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimine sağladığı faydaları ve süreçte karşılaşabilecek zorlukları ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma kapsamına alınması uygun bulunan 20 çalışmanın bulgularına hibrit bir yaklaşımla tematik analiz uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, eylem araştırmasının öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel bir bakış açısı kazanmalarına, profesyonel kimliklerini yeniden yapılandırmalarına, öğrencileri öğretim faaliyetinin aktif katılımcıları olarak görmelerine, işbirliğine değer vermelerine ve araştırma anlayışlarını (yeniden) kavramsallaştırmalarına yardımcı olan önemli bir uygulama olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte çalışmanın bulguları, eylem araştırmasını hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimine dahil ederken öğretmenlik uygulaması dersi kısıtlılıkları, değerlendirme talepleri, ortaklar arasındaki zayıf iletişim ve zaman kısıtlamaları gibi problemlerin göz önünde bulundurulması gerektiğini de göstermektedir. Bulguların değerlendirilmesi sonucunda, öğretmen adaylarının hayatlarının bu geçiş döneminde ihtiyaçları ve kaygıları farklı olabileceğinden; hizmet öncesi eylem araştırması çalışmalarının farklı bir boyutta ele alınması ve bu konuda daha fazla çalışma yapılması gerektiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Eylem araştırmasını öğretmenlerin gelişimi için kullanmayı planlayan hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi programları için öneriler çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eylem araştırması, hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi, faydalar, problemler, Action research, pre-service teacher education, opportunities, challenges

Kaynakça

• Amir, A., Mandler, D., Hauptman, S., & Gorev, D. (2017). Discomfort as a means of pre-service teachers’ professional development–an action research as part of the ‘Research Literacy’ course. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 231-245.
• Aras, S. (2021). Action research as an inquiry-based teaching practice model for teacher education programs. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 34(2), 153-168.
• Arefian, M. H. (2022). Collaborative action research as a reflective tool for pre-service EFL teachers’ inclusion. Reflective Practice, 1-12.
• Banegas, D. L., & Consoli, S. (2021). Initial English language teacher education: The effects of a module on teacher research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(4), 491-507.
• Burbank, M. D., & Kauchak, D. (2003). An alternative model for professional development: Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching and teacher education, 19(5), 499-514.
• Burns, A. (2019). Action research in English language teaching: Contributions and recent developments. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 991-1005). Cham: Springer.
• Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 5(1), 43-51.
• Capobianco, B. M., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2015). Navigating layers of teacher uncertainty among preservice science and mathematics teachers engaged in action research. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 581-598.
• Ceylan, E., Uştuk, O., & Çomoglu, I. (2017). The ELT practicum in Turkey: A meta-synthesis of 2008-2017 qualitative research. The Literacy Trek, 3(2), 102-113.
• Clandinin, D. J. (2019). Teacher education as narrative inquiry. In Journeys in Narrative Inquiry (pp. 79-90). Routledge.
• Conroy, J., Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2013). Developing a ‘clinical’ model for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(5), 557-573.
• Consoli, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2021). Research engagement in language education. Educational Action Research, 29(3), 347-357.
• Çomoglu, I., & Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Learning to become an English language teacher: Navigating the self through peer practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(8), 23-40.
• Darwin, S., & Barahona, M. (2019). Can an outsider become an insider? Analysing the effect of action research in initial EFL teacher education programs. Educational Action Research, 27(5), 709-725.
• Delamarter, J. (2019). Becoming something new. In Proactive Images for Pre-Service Teachers (pp. 149-187). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Pre-service and in-service EFL teachers as researchers. In Çelik, S. (Ed.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: Contemporary issues in EFL education (pp. 167-174). Ankara: Vizetek.
• Dikilitaş, K., & Comoglu, I. (2022). Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 26-42.
• Faikhamta, C., & Clarke, A. (2015). Thai pre-service science teachers engaging action research during their fifth year internship. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(2), 259-273.
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
• Hagevik, R., Aydeniz, M., & Rowell, C. G. (2012). Using action research in middle level teacher education to evaluate and deepen reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 675-684.
• Jakhelln, R., & Pörn, M. (2019). Challenges in supporting and assessing bachelor’s theses based on action research in initial teacher education. Educational Action Research, 27(5), 726-741.
• Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. Routledge.
• Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational Action Research, 18(4), 417–427.
• Kizilaslan, I., & Leutwyler, B. (2012). Pre-service teacher action research: Concept, international trends and implications for teacher education in Turkey. In N. Popov et al. (Eds.), International perspectives on education (pp. 155–162). Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
• Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of teacher education, 54(2), 135-149.
• Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: No. 74. Insights from practice – New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 5-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Murray-Harvey, R., T. Slee, P., Lawson, M. J., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russell, A. (2000). Under stress: The concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. European journal of teacher education, 23(1), 19-35.
• Öztürk, G., & Aydin, B. (2019). English language teacher education in Turkey: Why do we fail and what policy reforms are needed?. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9(1), 181-213.
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
• Ponte, P., Beijard, D., & Ax, J. (2004). Don't wait till the cows come home: Action research and initial teacher education in three different countries. Teachers and Teaching, 10(6), 591-621.
• Price, J. N. (2001). Action research, pedagogy and change: The transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43-74.
• Smith, K., & Sela, O. (2005). Action research as a bridge between pre‐service teacher education and in‐service professional development for students and teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 293-310.
• Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction: Insights from action research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 153-168.
• Tripp, D. (2005). Action research: A methodological introduction. Educacao e pesquisa, 31(3), 443-466.
• Ulvik, M. (2014). Student-teachers doing action research in their practicum: why and how?. Educational action research, 22(4), 518-533.
• Ulvik, M., & Riese, H. (2016). Action research in pre-service teacher education–a never-ending story promoting professional development. Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 441-457.
• Ulvik, M., Riese, H., & Roness, D. (2018). Action research–connecting practice and theory. Educational Action Research, 26(2), 273-287.
• Ustuk, Ö., & Çomoglu, I. (2019). Lesson study for professional development of English language teachers: Key takeaways from international practices. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 12(2), 41-50.
• Van Katwijk, L., Jansen, E., & Van Veen, K. (2021). Pre-service teacher research: a way to future-proof teachers?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-21.
• Villacañas de Castro, L. S. (2014). Meta-action research with pre-service teachers: A case study. Educational Action Research, 22(4), 534-551.
• Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Struyven, K., & Engels, N. (2017). Teachers and pre-service teachers as partners in collaborative teacher research: A systematic literature review. Teaching and teacher education, 64, 230-245.
• Yan, C. (2017). ‘You never know what research is like unless you’ve done it!’ Action research to promote collaborative student-teacher research. Educational Action Research, 25(5), 704-719.