The Effectiveness of Daily-Life Oriented Project Based Learning on Students’ Conceptual Understanding

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 61, 2058 - 2082, 27.09.2024

Şefika Girgin , Bayram Coştu

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1423636

Öz

This study investigates the impact of daily-life oriented project-based learning (PBL) on the conceptual understanding of 5th grade students in the Matter and Change unit. The study was conducted with 80 5th grade students from a public primary school in Istanbul, Turkey. The experimental group received daily-life oriented PBL activities, while the control group received traditional instruction. A mixed-methods approach was employed, with a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design for the quantitative segment and open-ended questions for the qualitative aspect. The Conceptual Comprehension Test was used to measure the students' conceptual understanding before and after the intervention. The study found a significant difference between the scores of the groups from the conceptual understanding pre-test and conceptual understanding post-test in favor of the post-test. The study also found a decrease in misconceptions and an increase in sound understanding of concepts such as "heat exchange," "boiling point," "expansion," "contraction," and "evaporation" in the experimental group. The study suggests that PBL activities aligned with key concepts and emphasizing connections between daily life and subject achievements can enhance students' learning outcomes. The study provides practical implications for educators, emphasizing the importance of pedagogical approaches that prioritize student-centered, inquiry-based learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conceptual understanding, daily-life oriented project based learning, misconception

L'effet de l'apprentissage par projet axé sur la vie quotidienne sur la compréhension conceptuelle des étudiants

Öz

Cette étude examine l'effet de l'apprentissage par projet axé sur la vie quotidienne sur la compréhension conceptuelle des élèves dans le cadre de l'unité Matière et Changement de 5e année. La recherche a été menée auprès de 80 élèves de 5e année étudiant dans une école publique d'Istanbul. Alors que le groupe expérimental recevait des activités d’apprentissage par projet axées sur la vie quotidienne, le groupe témoin recevait un enseignement traditionnel. Une conception de groupe témoin quasi-expérimentale prétest-posttest a été utilisée pour les données quantitatives, et une approche de méthode mixte composée de questions ouvertes a été utilisée pour la dimension qualitative. Le test de compréhension conceptuelle a été utilisé pour mesurer la compréhension conceptuelle des étudiants avant et après la candidature. Dans l'étude, une différence significative a été trouvée entre les scores du pré-test de compréhension conceptuelle et les scores post-test de compréhension conceptuelle des groupes en faveur du post-test. L'étude a également révélé une diminution des idées fausses dans le groupe expérimental et une meilleure compréhension de concepts tels que « changement de chaleur », « point d'ébullition », « expansion », « contraction » et « évaporation ». L'étude suggère que les activités d'apprentissage basées sur des projets, alignées sur les concepts de base et mettant l'accent sur les liens entre la vie quotidienne et les acquis des matières, peuvent améliorer les résultats d'apprentissage des élèves.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Compréhension conceptuelle, apprentissage par projet axé sur la vie quotidienne, idées fausses

Die Auswirkung von alltagsorientiertem, projektbasiertem Lernen auf das konzeptionelle Verständnis der Schüler

Öz

Diese Studie untersucht die Wirkung von projektbasiertem Lernen mit Fokus auf das tägliche Leben auf das konzeptionelle Verständnis von Schülern im Rahmen der Einheit „Materie und Veränderung“ der 5. Klasse. Die Untersuchung wurde mit 80 Schülern der 5. Klasse einer öffentlichen Schule in Istanbul durchgeführt. Während die Versuchsgruppe projektbasierte Lernaktivitäten mit Schwerpunkt auf dem täglichen Leben erhielt, erhielt die Kontrollgruppe traditionellen Unterricht. Für die quantitativen Daten wurde ein quasi-experimentelles Pretest-Posttest-Kontrollgruppendesign verwendet, für die qualitative Dimension ein Mixed-Methods-Ansatz bestehend aus offenen Fragen. Der konzeptionelle Verständnistest wurde verwendet, um das konzeptionelle Verständnis der Schüler vor und nach der Anwendung zu messen. In der Studie wurde ein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen den Ergebnissen des konzeptionellen Verständnisses vor dem Test und dem konzeptionellen Verständnis nach dem Test der Gruppen zugunsten des Posttests festgestellt. Die Studie ergab außerdem, dass es in der Versuchsgruppe zu einem Rückgang falscher Vorstellungen und einem Anstieg des gesunden Verständnisses von Konzepten wie „Wärmeveränderung“, „Siedepunkt“, „Expansion“, „Kontraktion“ und „Verdunstung“ kam. Die Studie legt nahe, dass projektbasierte Lernaktivitäten, die an Kernkonzepten ausgerichtet sind und die Verbindungen zwischen dem täglichen Leben und den Fachleistungen betonen, die Lernergebnisse der Schüler verbessern können.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konzeptionelles Verständnis, alltagsorientiertes projektbasiertes Lernen, Missverständnisse

Günlük Yaşam Odaklı Proje Tabanlı Öğrenmenin Öğrencilerin Kavramsal Anlamalarına Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, günlük yaşam odaklı proje tabanlı öğrenmenin 5. sınıf Madde ve Değişim ünitesi kapsamında öğrencilerin kavramsal anlayışlarına etkisini araştırmaktadır. Araştırma İstanbul'da bir devlet okulunda öğrenim gören 80 5. sınıf öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Deney grubu günlük yaşam odaklı proje tabanlı öğrenme etkinlikleri alırken, kontrol grubu geleneksel öğretim almıştır. Nicel veriler için yarı deneysel ön test-son test kontrol gruplu tasarım, nitel boyut için açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan karma yöntem yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Uygulama öncesinde ve sonrasında öğrencilerin kavramsal anlamalarını ölçmek amacıyla Kavramsal Anlama Testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada grupların kavramsal anlama ön testi ve kavramsal anlama son testi puanları arasında son test lehine anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur. Çalışmada ayrıca deney grubunda kavram yanılgılarında azalma ve "ısı değişimi", "kaynama noktası", "genleşme", "büzülme" ve "buharlaşma" gibi kavramların sağlıklı anlaşılmasında artış olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, temel kavramlarla uyumlu ve günlük yaşam ile konu başarıları arasındaki bağlantıları vurgulayan proje tabanlı öğrenme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin öğrenme çıktılarını artırabileceğini öne sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kavramsal anlama, günlük yaşam odaklı proje tabanlı öğrenme, kavram yanılgısı

Kaynakça

• Adadan, E. & Savaşçı, F. (2012). An analysis of 16–17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513-544.
• Akpınar, E. (2014). The use of interactive computer animations based on POE as a presentation tool in primary science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 527-537.
• Altun, S. (2008). Examining the effect of project-based teaching method on students' academic achievements in the subject of electricity, their attitudes towards physics and scientific process skills. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Atatürk University.
• Ardianti, S. D., Pratiwi, I. A., & Kanzunnudin, M. (2017). Implementasi project based learning (PBL) berpendekatan science edutaiment terhadap kreativitas peserta didik. refleksi edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(2), 145–150.
• Ardianti, S. D., Raida, S. A. (2022). The effect of project based learning with ethnoscience approach on science conceptual understanding. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(2), 207-214.
• Atav, E., Erdem, E., Yılmaz, A. & Güçlüm, B. (2004). The effect of creating analogies in meaningful learning of enzymes. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal. 27,21–29.
• Ayas, A. & Coştu, B. (2001). Levels of Understanding of the Concepts of “Evaporation, Condensation and Boiling” of High School I Students. Symposium on Science Education in Turkey at the Beginning of the New Millennium, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Proceedings Book, 273-280.
• Bakır, R. (2019). Investigation of conceptual understanding of middle school 5th grade students in matter and change unit via concept cartoons.[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Sakarya University.
• Balkı, A.G. (2003). An evaluation of the implementation of the project-based learning method by Konya Esentepe private primary school. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Konya Selçuk University.
• Bell, B. (1998). Teacher development in science education. In: B Fraser & K. Tobin (eds.) International handbook of science education, pp. 681-693. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
• Bell, P. (1998) Designing for students’ conceptual change in science using argumentation and classroom debate. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California at Berkeley.
• Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century. Corwin Press.
• Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of style. Sage.
• Brundiers, K., & Wiek, A. (2013). Do we teach what we preach? An international comparison of problem- and project-based learning courses in sustainability. Sustainability, 5(4), 1725–1746.
• Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in stu-dents’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750.
• Buluş, M. (2021). Sample size determination and optimal design of randomized/non-equivalent pretest-posttest control-group designs. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 48-69.
• Büyükdede, M. & Tanel, R. (2018). İş-enerji ve itme-momentum konularına yönelik FeTeMM etkinliklerinin kavramsal anlama üzerine etkisi. Diyalektolog Ulusal Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 379-395.
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio books.
• Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish undergraduates’ misconceptions of evaporation, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1757-1770.
• Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken, S., & Geban, Ö. (2004). Some comman misconceptions in chemistry. Gazi University Faculty of Education Journal, 24(1), 135-146.
• Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerine, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307.
• Creswell. J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Coşkun, M. (2004). Project-based learning approach in geography education. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
• Coştu, B., Ayas, A., Niaz, M., Ünal, S., & Çalık, M. (2007). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of boiling concept. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 16, 524-536.
• Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 11(3), 5–16.
• Çeliker, H. D. & Balım, A. G. (2012). The effect of project-based learning applications on student achievement in the unit "Solar system and beyond: The space puzzle". Journal of Theoretical Education Science, 5(3).
• Çepni, S. (2005). Science and technology from theory to practice (4th ed.). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
• Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D. & Turgut, M. F. (1997). Fizik Öğretimi [Physics Teaching]. Ankara: National Education Development Project Initial Teacher Training Trial Edition, 31-44.
• Çıbık, A.S. (2006). The effect of project-based learning approach on students' logical thinking skills and attitudes in science class. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çukurova University.
• Demirel Ö., Başbay A., Uyangör N. and Bıyıklı C. (2001) The effect of the project-based learning model on the learning process and student attitudes. Xth National Educational Sciences Congress Abant İzzet Baysal University, 7-9 June Proceedings Volume II, 879-889.
• Demirelli, H. (2003). A laboratory activity based on constructivist learning theory: Electrode calibration and gran method. Gazi University Faculty of Education Journal, 23(2), 161-170.
• Djanette, B. & Fouad, C. (2014). Determination of university students’ misconceptions about light using concept maps. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 582-589.
• Doğanay, A. ve Tok, Ş. (2008). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri. İçinde A. Doğanay (Ed.) Öğretimde çağdaş yaklaşımlar (s. 236-237). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw HIll.
• Gedik, M. (2018). Examining the effect of using science toys in teaching on secondary school students' conceptual understanding and attitudes about energy. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Balıkesir University.
• Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (2000). The effects of cooperative learning on students with learning diffuculties in the lower elemantary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 19-27.
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
• Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454.
• Hidayah, N., Arum, A. P., & Apriyansa, A. (2021, December). Project-based learning (PjBL): Ad-vantages, disadvantages, and solutions to voca¬tional education (in pandemic era). In ICLSSE 2021: Proceedings of the 3rd International Con¬ference on Law, Social Sciences, and Education, ICLSSE 2021, 09 September 2021, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia (p. 57). European Alliance for Innovation.
• Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 383-395.
• Jalinus, N., Syahril, S., & Nabawi, R. A. (2019). A comparison of the problem-solving skills of students in PjBL versus CPjBL model: An ex¬perimental study. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(1).
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
• Kadıoğlu, H. (2007). The effect of the project-based learning approach on students' attitudes towards social studies lessons and visual presentation applications. [Unpublished master's thesis]. Marmara University.
• Kalaycı, N. (2008). An application related to project based learning in higher education analysis in terms of students directing the project. Education and Science, 33(147), 85-105.
• Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A. & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008.
• Kaur, G. (2013). A review of selected literature on causative agents and identification strategies of students’ misconceptions. Educationia Confab, 2(11), 79-94.
• Kaplan, M. (2016). The effect of the 7th grade force and motion unit of the science course taught with the differentiated teaching method on students' conceptual understanding, scientific process skills and academic achievement. [Unpublished master's thesis]. Dokuz Eylül University.
• Keleş, E. & Kefeli, P. (2010). Determination of student misconceptions in “photosynthesis and respiration” unit and correcting them with the help of CAI material. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3111-3118.
• Kılıç, A. (2015). The effect of conceptual understanding and writing skills of 4th class students on Project based learning approach in “Electricity In Our Life” unit. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Dumlupınar University.
• Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. Cambridge University Press.
• Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2018). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach. Routledge.
• Krajcik, J. S. & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), the Cambridge handbook of learning sciences, (2nd ed., ). New York: Cambridge.
• Krajcik, J., Schneider, B., Miller, E. A., Chen, I. C., Bradford, L., Baker, Q., ... & Peek-Brown, D. (2023). Assessing the effect of project-based learning on science learning in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 60(1), 70-102.
• Konca-Şentürk, F. (2017). The effects of STEM activities on conceptual understanding and scientific creativity in science classes and student opinions. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University.
• Konicek-Moran, R. & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for Conceptual Understanding in Science. NSTA Publishing.
• Korkmaz, H. (2002). The effect of project-based learning in science education on creative thinking, problem solving and academic risk taking levels. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 22, 164-170.
• Korkmaz, H. & Kaptan, F. (2002). The effect of project-based learning approach in science education on primary school students' academic achievement, academic self-concept and study time. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 22, 91-97.
• Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283-293.
• Kurt, H. & Ekici, G. (2013). What is a virus? Prospective biology teachers’ cognitive structure on the concept of virus. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 736-756.
• Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö. & Aktaş, M. (2013). Determining cognitive structures and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of pre-service biology teachers). Creative Education, 4(9), 572-587.
• Liu, M., & Hsiao, Y. (2002). Middle school students as multimedia designers: a project-based learning approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 311-337.
• Matyar, F. (2008). New approaches in science and technology teaching. In Ö. Taşkın (Ed.) Project and research-based learning in science and technology teaching (p, 24). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publications.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
• Moursund, D. (1998). Project-Based Learning Using Information Technology. International Society for Technology in Education.
• National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
• Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study. Science Education,65(2), 187-196.
• Özata Yücel, E. & Özkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students’ cognitive structure, and misconception in ecological concepts through word association tests. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674.
• Özmen, H., Demircioğlu, H., & Demircioğlu, G. (2009). The effects of conceptual change texts accompanied with animations on overcoming 11th grade students’ alternative conceptions of chemical bonding. Computers & Education, 52(3), 681–695.
• Prajoko, S., Sukmawati, I., Pamungkas, S. J., Per¬madani, K. G., Alamsyah, M. R. N., & Dar¬mawan, E. (2023). Asynchronous project-based learning: Is it effective in the biology learning process? Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 16(1), 37-46.
• Polat, G. (2013). Determination of the cognitive structures of year secondary school students through word association test techniques. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 7(1), 97-120.
• Pınarbaşı, T. & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solutions chemistry concepts, Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328-1332.
• Shpeizer, R. (2019). Towards a successful integration of project-based learning in higher education: Challenges, technologies and methods of im¬plementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1765-1771.
• Sreenivasulu, B. & Subramaniam, R. (2013). University students’ understanding of chemical hermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 601-635.
• Stephenson, P. & Warwick, P. (2002). Using concept cartoons to support progression in students' understanding of light. Physics Education, 37, 135.
• Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: a primer. Technology and Learning, 23(6), 20-27.
• Sözbilir, M. (2003). A review of selected literature on students’ misconceptions of heat and temperature. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 20(1), 25-41.
• Sukarmin, S., Suparmi, Ms & Ratnasari, D. (2017). The Implementation of Two-tier Multiple Choice (TTMC) to Analyse Students' Conceptual Understanding Profile on Heat and Temperature. 10.2991/ictte-17.2017.41.
• Şendur, G., Toprak, M. & Pekmez, E. Ş. (2008). The effect of analogy method in preventing misconceptions on evaporation and boiling. Ege Education Journal, 9(2), 37-58.
• Tsai, C. C., & Chou, C. (2002). Diagnosing students’ alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 157–165.
• Tola, Z. (2016). The effect of argumentation instruction on 6th grade students’ conceptual knowledge, scientific reasoning and nature of science understanding. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Kocaeli University.
• Topçu, K. (2017). Investigation of the Effect of Formative Probe Questions on the Conceptual Understanding of 7th Grade Students in the Unit “Solar System and Beyond: The Space Puzzle”. [Master's thesis]. Uludağ University.
• Ülgen, G. (2001). Concept development. Ankara: PegemA Publishing House.
• Ürek, R., & Tarhan, L. (2005). A Practice of active Learning based on constructivism to eliminate misconceptions on covalent bonds. Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education Journal, 28,168-177.
• White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761342
• Yurtluk, M. (2003). The impact of the project-based learning approach on the learning process and student attitudes in mathematics classes. [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hacettepe University.
• Zhang, L. & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1202728.