Öğretmen Cesaretlendirmesinin İngilizceyi Yabanci Dil Olarak Öğrenen Türk Lise Öğrencilerinin Yabancı Dili Konuşma İsteklilikleri Üzerindeki Etkisi

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 62, 3773 - 3806, 30.12.2024

Aykut Aksın , Tahir Yaşar

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1562218

Öz

Bu çalışmada araştırmacıların amacı, Türkiye'deki bir devlet okulunda öğrencilerin İngilizce konuşma istekliliğini tespit etmek ve bu istekliliğin öğretmenler tarafından nasıl etkilendiğini incelemektir. Araştırma, özellikle öğrenci-öğretmen etkileşimlerinin dil öğrenme süreçlerine olan etkisini ele almış ve öğretmenlerin sadece geleneksel eğitim rolünde kalmayıp, aynı zamanda öğrenme danışmanı olarak da hareket ettiklerini vurgulamıştır. Çalışmada karma yöntem araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Van ilindeki bir devlet lisesinden kolay örnekleme yoluyla seçilen 40 lise öğrencisi katılımcı olarak belirlenmiştir. Veri toplama araçları olarak İletişim İstekliliği Ölçeği (İİÖ), Bu Sınıfta Neler Oluyor (BSNO) Anketi ve yarı yapılandırılmış sorular kullanılmıştır. Nicel veri analizinde, değişkenlerin normal dağılım testi, t-testi, ANOVA, Pearson Korelasyon Analizi, Basit ve Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Analizleri gibi yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda, sınıf atmosferi, öğretmen desteği ve öğrenci kaynaşması ile İngilizce konuşma isteği arasında pozitif ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Nitel analizler ise, motivasyon, olumlu geri bildirim, bireysel ilgi, öğretmen teşviki, etkileşimli sınıf etkinlikleri ve günlük İngilizce kullanımının, öğrencilerin konuşma isteğini artıran başlıca faktörler olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sonuçlar, öğrencilerin dil öğrenme deneyimlerinin geliştirilmesi için olumlu bir sınıf ortamı, etkileşimli öğretim yöntemleri ve destekleyici öğretmen iletişiminin önemini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğretmen Cesaretlendirmesi, iletişim istekliliği, Öğrenci-öğretmen etkileşimleri, Sınıf İklimi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, yazarın The Effect of Teacher Encouragement on Turkish High School EFL Learners’ L2 Willingness to Communicate (L2WTC)’ (Öğretmen Teşvikinin İngilizce’yi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenen Türk Lise Öğrencilerinin Yabancı Dil Konuşma İsteklilikleri Üzerindeki Etkisi) başlıklı yüksek lisans tezinden üretilmiştir. Çalışmanın hazırlanması sürecinde, Hakkari Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu'nun belirlediği etik kurallara ve akademik standartlara tamamen uyulmuştur. Araştırma, 12.04.2023 tarihli , 2023/43 sayılı oturumu ve 1 No'lu karar ile etik kurul onayı alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcılardan gerekli izinler alınmış, gizlilik ve gönüllülük esasına uygun hareket edilmiştir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum veya kuruluş tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmada sağladığı değerli rehberlik ve destek için Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Tahir YAŞAR'a , Prof. Dr. Erdoğan BADA'ya ve Öğr. Gör Abdullah YOLDAŞ'a teşekkür ederim.

The Impact of Teacher Encouragement on Turkish High School EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in Second Language (L2WTC)

Öz

This study aimed to investigate the willingness of language learners in a public school in Türkiye to communicate in English and investigated the role of teachers in shaping their student’s willingness to communicate. The research primarily focused on how interactions between students and teachers impact the language learning process, highlighting that teachers, in addition to their conventional teaching duties, also take on the role of learning advisors. A mixed-method research design was utilized, with 40 high school students from a school in Van, Türkiye, selected through convenience sampling. The data collection tools included the Willingness to Communicate (WTC) Scale, What is Happening in This Class (WIHIC) Questionnaire, and semi-structured interview questions. Statistical analyses were conducted utilising IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0, with a significance level of 0.05. The quantitative analysis involved methods such as normality tests, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, Simple Linear Regression, and Multiple Linear Regression. The findings from the quantitative data showed positive correlations between classroom climate, teacher support, student cohesiveness, and students' WTC in English. Meanwhile, qualitative analysis identified key themes including motivation, positive feedback, personal interest, teacher encouragement, interactive classroom activities, and regular use of English, all of which contributed to students' WTC in English. The research underscored the significance of creating a positive classroom environment, harnessing interactive teaching methods, and fostering supportive teacher-student communication to enhance students' English language learning experiences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teacher encouragement, Willingness to communicate, Student-teacher interaction, Classroom climate

Etik Beyan

This study is derived from the author’s master’s thesis, "The Effect of Teacher Encouragement on Turkish High School EFL Learners’ L2 Willingness to Communicate (L2WTC)." During the preparation of this study, all ethical principles and academic standards established by the Ethics Committee of Hakkari University were strictly adhered to. The research was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee under Decision No. 1, dated 12.04.2023, and Session No. 2023/43. Necessary permissions were obtained from the participants, and confidentiality and voluntary participation principles were meticulously observed.

Destekleyen Kurum

This study was not supported by any institution or organization.

Teşekkür

I would like to express my gratitude to my esteemed advisor, Dr. Tahir YAŞAR, Prof. Dr. Erdoğan BADA and Lec. Abdullah YOLDAŞ for their guidance and support throughout every stage of this study.

Kaynakça

• Alcott, B. (2017). Does teacher encouragement influence students’ educational progress? A propensity-score matching analysis. Research in Higher Education, 58(7), 773–804.
• Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence. The ELT Journal, p. 56, 57–64.
• Alrabai, F. (2022). Teacher communication and learner willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: A structural equation modelling approach. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 2(2), 45-67.
• Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness in D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 3 (Andersen,1979, pp. 543- 559), New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
• Asmalı, M. (2016). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in the Turkish context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 232, 188–195.
• Asmali, M., Bilki, U., & Duban, C. A. (2015). A Comparison of the Turkish and Romanian students' willingness to communicate and its affecting factors in English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(1), 59-74.
• Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2009). Turkish EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. In First International Congress of Educational Research: Trends and educational research issues. Çanakkale: Educational Research Association, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Ministry of National Education.
• Aydın, F. (2017). Willingness to Com municate (WTC) among Intermediate-level A dult Turkish EFL Learners: Underlying Factors. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(3), 109-137.
• Bailey, K. M. (2003). Speaking. Practical English language teaching, pp. 47–66.
• Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311–341.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146- 6402(78)90002-4
• Basöz, T., & Erten, I. H. (2019). A Qualitative Inquiry into the Factors Influencing EFL Learners' In-Class Willingness to Communicate in English. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(1), 1-18.
• Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25-37.
• Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60-69.
• Çakır, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(4), 67–72.
• Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, pp. 39, 468– 479.
• Cao, Y. Q. (2009). Understanding the notion of interdependence and the dynamics of willingness to communicate (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
• Çelik, S., Arıkan, A., & Caner, M. (2013). In the eyes of Turkish EFL learners: What makes an effective foreign language teacher?
• Çeliktürk, H., & Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y. (2023). The impact of a digital game on EFL students’ willingness to communicate in English. Eurasian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 3(1).
• Çetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University.
• Chen, X., J. M. Dewaele, and T. Zhang. 2022. “Sustainable Development of EFL/ESL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate: The Effects of Teachers and Teaching Styles.” Sustainability 14 (1): 396. doi:10.3390/su14010396.
• Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Validation and use of the 'What is Happening in this Class'(WIHIC) questionnaire in Singapore. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 1998.
• Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
• Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language learning, 41(4), 469–512.
• Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Demir Ayaz, A. (2017). The retationship between EFL learners’ language learning strategy use, willingness to communicate, and L2 achivement. International Journal of Language Academy, 5.
• den Brok, P., Telli, S., Çakıroglu, J., Taconis, R., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Learning environment profiles of Turkish secondary biology classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 13, 187-204.
• Doğançay-Aktuna, S. (1998). The spread of English in Turkey and its current sociolinguistic profile. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19(1), 24–39.
• Dorman, J. P. (2003). Cross-national validation of the What is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environments Research, pp. 6, 231–245.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Muir, C. (2019). Creating a motivating classroom environment. Second handbook of English language teaching, 719-736.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (Vol. 36). Multilingual Matters.
• Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, (40)1, 83–107. https://doi: 10.2307/40264512.
• Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modelling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.
• Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, USA, April 1996.
• Friedman, P. G. (1980). Shyness and Reticence in Students.
• Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. (No Title).
• Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77.
• Guéguen, N., Martin, A., & Andrea, C. R. (2015). “I am sure you’ll succeed”: When a teacher’s verbal encouragement of success increases children’s academic performance. Learning and Motivation, 52, 54-59.
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
• Hsu, L. (2010). The impact of perceived teachers’ nonverbal immediacy on students’ motivation for learning English. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 188–204.
• Huang, I. T. C., Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. (1998). A cross-national study of perceived classroom environments in Taiwan and Western Australia: Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 343–362.
• İlter, O. (2018). Turkish EFL learners' willingness to communicate: promoting and debilitating sides of teacher effects.
• Kanat-Mutluoğlu, A. (2016). The influence of ideal L2 self, academic self-concept and intercultural communicative competence on willingness to communicate in a foreign language. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 27-46.
• Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic Emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, pp. 33, 277–292.
• Kim, S.J. (2004). Exploring Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Students in Korea: WTC as a Predictor of Success in Second Language Acquisition. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.
• Knott, E., Rao, A. H., Summers, K., & Teeger, C. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1), 73.
• Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Kuzu, E., Özkan, Y., & Bada, E. (2021). An EFL program evaluation: A case from Turkey. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 21(1), 94- 106.
• Lee & Fraser (2002). High school science classroom learning environments in Korea. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
• Lee, J. S., Sylvén, L. K., and Lee, K. (2021). Cross-cultural insights into Korean and Swedish secondary school students’ willingness to communicate in a second language. J. Multiling. Multicultural Dev. 42, 522–536. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2019.1708917
• Lee, W., & Ng, S. (2010). Reducing student reticence through teacher interaction strategy. ELT Journal, 64(3), 302–313.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (1995). How does anxiety affect second language learning? A replay to Sparks and Ganschow. Modern Language Journal, 79, 90–99.
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, pp. 15, 3–26.
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Investigating language class anxiety using the focused essay technique. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 296-304.
• MacIntyre, P. D., & J. Doucette. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System 38. 161–71.
• MacIntyre, P. D., & J. J. Legatto. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly change. Applied Linguistics 32. 149–71.
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Wang, L. (2021). Willingness to communicate in the L2 about meaningful photos: Application of the pyramid model of WTC. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 878-898
• MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualising willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
• McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 5(2), 19.
• Mehrabian, A. (1971). Immediacy: Liking and approach. Silent messages, 1-23.
• Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitude (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Mu, W., Chen, Z., & Duan, W. (2021). An extended evaluation of Academic Encouragement Scale for adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(3), 332-345.
• Öksüz-Zerey, M., & Cephe, P. T. (2020). An investigation into the relationship between willingness to communicate and classroom environment in a Turkish EFL context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 896-911.
• Öz, H. (2014). Big Five personality traits and willingness to communicate among foreign language learners in Turkey. Social Behaviour and Personality, 42(9), 1473–1482.
• Öz, H. (2016). Role of the ideal L2 self in predicting willingness to communicate of EFL students.
• Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in the Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269-275.
• Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2015). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.
• Peng. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System 40. 203–13.
• Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., Jajarmi, H., Tabatabaee Farani, S., & Shayesteh, S. (2021). Examining the role of teachers’ stroking behaviours in EFL learners’ active/passive motivation and teacher success. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 707314.
• Reeves, J. (2004). “Like everybody else”: Equalizing educational opportunity for English language learners. Tesol Quarterly, 38(1), 43-66.
• Shirzadeh, F., & Jajarmi, H. (2023). Teachers’ Stroking Behavior in Anxiety, Willingness to Communicate, and Achievement. Journal of Cognition, Emotion & Education, 1-15.
• Taşdemir, H. (2018). Exploring the relationship between high school studentswillingness to communicate and their self-efficacy perceptions in Turkish efl context (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü)
• Telli, S., Çakıroglu, J., & Brok, P. D. (2006). Turkish secondary educations students’ perception of their classroom learning environment. In Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: Worldviews (pp. 517-542).
• Telli, S., den Brok, P. and Çakıroğlu, J. (2008). “Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the ideal teacher”, in Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 33, 149: 118-125.
• Telli, S., Rakıcı, N., & Çakıroglu, J. (2003). Learning environment and students’ attitudes towards biology. Retrieved August, 29, 2010.
• Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal, 47(1), 22–31. Ushioda, E. (Ed.). (2013). International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges. Springer.
• Van Lier, L. (2004). The semiotics and ecology of language learning-perception, voice, identity and democracy. Utbildning & Demokrati–tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitk, 13(3), 79-103.
• Wang, C., Tseng, W. T., Chen, Y. L., & Cheng, H. F. (2020). Classroom interactions in the target language: Learners’ perceptions, willingness to communicate, and communication behaviour. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 393-404.
• Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualisation of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language culture and curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
• Wong, Y. J. (2015). The psychology of encouragement: Theory, research, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(2), 178–216.
• Yanık, A. T. (2023). The effects of technology-enhanced project-based learning on high school students’ utterance fluency and willingness to communicate. ( Master’s Thesis.Yoktez)
• Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.
• Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., Shimizu, K. (2004). The Influence of attitudes and effect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning 54:1, pp. 119–152.
• Yetkin, R., & Özer, Z. (2022). Age, gender, and anxiety as antecedents of willingness to communicate: Turkish EFL context. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 7(2), 195-205.
• Yıldız, C. (2022). Investigating willingness to communicate in English within the Turkish EFL classroom context. International Journal of Curriculum & Instruction, 15(1).
• Yıldız, C. (2023). Investigating willingness to communicate in English within the Turkish EFL classroom context: Communicate in English within the Turkish EFL classroom context. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15 (1), 192–218.
• Yildiz, R., & Piniel, K. (2020). Turkish students’ willingness to communicate in English as a Second Language in a third language environment. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 5(1), 156-185.
• Yılmaz, A. (2011). “Quality problem in the teaching profession: Qualities teacher candidates feel to be required of teachers”, in Educational Research and Reviews, 6, 14: –812-823.
• York, D. (2013). Investigating a relationship between nonverbal communication and student learning. Lindenwood University.
• Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The modern language journal, 75(4), 426–439.
• Yu, H., Li, H., & Gou, X. (2011). The personality-based variables and their correlations underlying willingness to communicate Asian Soc. Sci. 7, 253– 257. doi 10.5539/ass. v7n3p253
• Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). “Communicating in a Second Language: Investigating the Effect of Teacher on Learners’ Willingness to Communicate.” System 42: pp. 288–295. doi 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014.
• Zerey, M. Ö. (2017). The Relationship Between Willingness to Communicate and Classroom Environment in Turkish EFL Setting. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/