GEMİ İŞLETMECİLİĞİNDE SATIN ALMANIN YÖNETİMSEL VE OPERASYONEL BOYUTUNUN YARI YAPILANDIRILMIŞ GÖRÜŞMELERLE ANALİZİ

Yıl 2020, , 241 - 258, 25.12.2020

Ender Yalçın Özcan Arslan

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.837285

Öz

Gemiler tarafından ihtiyaç duyulan malzeme taleplerinin alınmasından gemiye ulaştırılmasına kadar geçen süreci kapsayan satınalma, gemi işletmeciliğinin en önemli maliyet bileşenini oluşturmaktadır. Bu sürecin yönetilmesi gemilerin sefer ve liman belirsizliklerinden dolayı oldukça karmaşık olabilmektedir. Bu çalışma da yazarlar, satınalma yönetiminin yönetimsel ve operasyonel boyutlarını analiz etmiştir. Bu amaçla, 15 farklı gemi işletme firmasından 35 satın alma uzmanı ile yarı yapılandırılmış sorular üzerinden görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu görüşmelerden çıkartılan en bariz bulgu satın alma kararlarında sıklıkla geleneksel yönteme yani tecrübeye başvurulduğu görülmüştür. Gemilerin yoğun programı ve gemi adamlarının yoğun temposu altında gemi stokları düzenli olarak kayıt altına alınamamaktadır. Böylece, karar vericiler, veriye dayalı karar vermekten ziyade tecrübelerine dayanarak karar vermektedir. Araştırmaya katılan denizcilik işletmelerinde, bir satın alma personeli yaklaşık 5 gemi-satın alma sürecinin yönetilmesinden sorumludur. İşletmelerde en az 3 tedarikçiden teklif alma, fiyat-kalite karşılaştırması yapma, uygun fiyatlarla iyi kalite malzeme tedariki yapma, satın alma stratejileri oluşturma ve tedarikçi ağını genişletme gibi sınırlı sayıda satın alma stratejisine başvurulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gemi tedarik zinciri, Satın alma, Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme, IMPA, Tedarik zinciri yönetimi

ANALYSING OF MANAGERIAL AND OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF PURCHASING IN SHIP MANAGEMENT WITH SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS

Öz

Purchasing which includes the process from receiving demands by ships until delivery to ship, is an important cost component of ship management. The managing of this process can be complicated due to vaguneness in ship voyages and ports. In this study, authors analysed purchasing management with operational and managerial perspectives. For this aim, interviews with the 35 purchasing experts from 15 different shipping companies have been conducted by using semi-structured questionnaires. The most prominent finding that emerges from the analysis is that the classical method, experience, is still the most applied approach in purchasing decisions. There is no regular record for ship stocks due to hectic ship schedule and workload of seafarers. Therefore, the decision makers apply to their experiences rather than data-driven decisions. In the shipping companies who participated the research, a procurement personnel is responsible for process of average 5 ship. These companies apply to limited purchasing strategies such as receiving at least 3 quotes, making price-quality comparison, procured good quality products with affordable price, establishing purchasing strategies and expanding the supplier network.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ship supply chain, Purchasing, Semi-structured interviews, IMPA, Supply chain management

Kaynakça

• Alipour, M. ve Damavandi, M. (2011). The impact of e-procurement implementation on performance of ship management companies (case study of IRISL). 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, 27-29.05.2011. Doi:10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6014969.
• Aslan, Z., Güneren, E. ve Çoban, G. (2014). Destinasyon markalaşma sürecinde yöresel mutfağın rolü: Nevşehir örneği. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2 (4): 3-13.
• Cooper, M.C., Lambert, D.M. ve Pagh D. (1997). Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1),1 – 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09574099710805556.
• Çebi, F. ve Otay, İ. (2016). A two-stage fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation problem with quantity discounts and lead time. Information Sciences, 339, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.12.032.
• Ellram, L.M. (1991). A Managerial guideline for the development and implementation of purchasing partnerships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27 (3), 2-8. Goh, M., Lau, G.T. ve Neo, L. (1999). Strategic role and contribution of purchasing in Singapore: a survey of CEOs. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35 (3), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1999.tb00240.x.
• Hu, Q., Boylan, J.E., Chen, H. ve Labib, A. (2018). OR in spare parts management: a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 266 (2), 395-414, ISSN 0377-2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.058.
• Hu, Q., Chakhar, S., Siraj, S. ve Labib, A. (2017). Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 262 (3), 1136-1163, ISSN 0377-2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.040.
• İlhan, İ. (2015). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde kantitatif talep tahmin yöntemi seçimi ile stok optimizasyonuna dair bir uygulama, Yüksek lisans tezi, Maltepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Endüstri Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
• IMPA. (2018). Marine stores guide, 7th edition.
• ISSA. (2013). Ship stores catalogue, the 2013 edition.
• Karahan, M. ve Aslan, Ş. (2016). Bir çimento fabrikasında hammadde stok kontrolü uygulaması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 (3): 773-783.
• Knoppen, D. ve Saenz, M.J. (2015). Purchasing: Can we bridge the gap between strategy and daily reality?. Business Horizons, 58 (1), January-February 2015, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.006.
• Krause, D.R., Pagell, M. ve Curkovic, S. (2001). Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing, Journal of Operations Management, 19, 497–512.
• Kumar, N.V.K. ve Srinivasan, B. (2013). Implementation and performance effect on electronic procurement and its ship management companies, International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 5: 10-16.
• Lambert, D.M. ve Cooper, M.C., (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 65-83.
• Li, L., Liu, M., Shen, W. ve Cheng, G. (2017). An improved stochastic programming model for supply chain planning of MRO spare parts. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 47, 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.03.031.
• Lin, X., Basten, R.J.I., Kranenburg, A.A. ve van-Houtum, G.J. (2017). Condition based spare parts supply. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 168, 240-248, ISSN 0951-8320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.035.
• Luttenberger, A. & Luttenberger, L. R. 2017. Sustainable procurement and environmental life-cycle costing in maritime transport, WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16: 219-231.
• Mahon, E. (2015). Transitioning the Enterprise to the Cloud: A Business Approach. Cloudworks Publ. Co., Hudson, OH. Meng, Q., Wang, Y. ve Du Y. (2015). Bunker procurement planning for container liner shipping companies: multistage stochastic programming approach. Transportation Research Record, 2479 (1): 60-68. https://doi.org/10.3141/2479-08.
• Mulder, M., Wesselink, R. ve Bruijstens, H.C.J. (2005). Job profile research for the purchasing profession. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(3), ISSN: 1360-3736.
• Nikitakos, N. ve Lambrou, M.A. (2007). Chapter 12 Digital Shipping: The Greek Experience. Research in Transportation Economics, 21, 383-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(07)21012-1.
• Pazhani, S., Ventura, J.A. ve Mendoza A. (2016). A serial inventory system with supplier selection and order quantity allocation considering transportation costs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40 (1), 612-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.06.008.
• Pohl, M. ve Förstl, K. (2011). Achieving purchasing competence through purchasing performance measurement system design-a multiple-case study analysis. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 17, 231-245. Doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.001.
• Ramsay, J. ve Croom, S. (2008). The impact of evolutionary and developmental metaphors on purchasing and supply management: a critique, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 14, 192-204. Doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2008.04.001.
• Saranga, H. ve Moser, R. (2010). Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 197-205. Doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.023.
• Schneider, L. ve Wallenburg, C.M. (2013). 50 Years of research on organizing the purchasing function: Do we need any more?. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 144-164. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.05.001.
• Teixeira, C., Lopes, I. ve Figueiredo, M. (2017). Multi-criteria classification for spare parts management: a case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1560-1567, ISSN 2351-9789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.295.
• UNCTAD. (2017). Review of maritime transport 2017. Virginia, T.F. ve Joseph, L.C. (1990). Fitting purchasing to the strategic firms: frameworks, processes and values. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26 (1), 6-10.
• Wang, W. ve Syntetos, A.A. (2011). Spare parts demand: linking forecasting to equipment maintenance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 1194-1209, ISSN 1366-5545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.04.008.
• Wang, Y., Meng, Q. ve Tan, Z. (2017). Short-term liner shipping bunker procurement with swap contracts. Maritime Policy & Management, 45 (2): 211-238.
• Yalçın, E., 2019. Bir tanker işletmesinde satın alma süreç modellemesi, Doktora Tezi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Yalcin, E., Arslan, O. ve Aymelek, M. (2020). Developing a policy management algorithm for ship provision: a Delphi Technique Integrated with Hesitant Fuzzy Set (DTIHFS) approach. Maritime Policy & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1766142.
• Yıldırım, A. (1999). Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin temel özellikleri ve eğitim araştırmalarındaki yeri ve önemi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 23 (112): 7-17, ISSN: 1300-1337.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 6. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.