ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMMUNICATION AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL WAY OF LIFE IN THE PHAEDRUS

Öz

This paper develops the theme of philosophy as a way of life by reading the Phaedrus utilizing the communicative practices – the forms and media - of the philosophy of communication. It will be shown that the various forms (rhetorical, mythical and dialectical) and media (spoken and written) of communication in the text are intimately interwoven with a certain conception of philosophy as a way of life dedicated to the search for truth. In the Phaedrus, Plato teaches us the ideal form of communication for the pursuit of philosophy. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Philosophy of communication
• rhetoric
• myth
• dialectic
• speech
• writing
• way of life

PHAIDROS’TA İLETIŞIM VE FELSEFI YAŞAM TARZI ARASINDAKI İLIŞKI ÜZERINE

Öz

Bu makale media iletişim biçimleri ve araçları gibi iletişimsel pratiklerden yararlanmak suretiyle ve Phaedrus okuması vasıtasıyla felsefenin konusunu bir yaşam tarzı olarak belirlemektedir. Metinde iletişimin çeşitli biçimlerinin (retorik, mitsel ve diyalektik) ve medyanın (sözlü ve yazılı), hakikati araştırmaya adanmış bir yaşam biçimi olarak felsefenin belli kavramları ile iç içe geçmiş olduğu gösterilecektir. Phaedrus'ta Platon bize, felsefenin peşinde olmak için gerekli ideal iletişim biçimini öğretmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İletişim felsefesi
• rhetorik
• mit
• diyalektik
• konuşma
• yazı
• yaşam tarzı

Kaynakça

1. References
2. Brook, T. (2010) ‘The Language of Love and Learning: Connecting Eros, Rhetoric and Knowledge in the Phaedrus’, The Midwest Quarterly, Pittsburg, 51.3 (Spring), pp. 254-269.
3. Burke, K. (1969), A Rhetoric of Motives, California: California University Press
4. Couthard, D and Keller, K (2012) ‘Technophilia, neo-Luddism, eDependency and the judgement of Thamus’ Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 10 Iss 4, pp. 262-272.
5. Derrida, J. (1981), Dissemination, Chicago: University of Chicago Press Ltd.
6. Ferrari, G.F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Gadamer, H.G. (2003) Truth and Method, New York: The Contiinuum Publishing Company.
8. Griswold, C.L. (1986) Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus, New Haven: Yale University Press.

9. Hadot, P. (1995) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Peters, D J. (1999), Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication, Chicago: University of Chicago Press Ltd.
11. Lentz, T.M. (1983) ‘The Third Place from Truth: Plato’s Paradoxical attack on Writing’, Communication Quarterly, Vol. 31, No 4, Fall.
12. Plato Phaedrus (2002), (translated Robin Waterfield), Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
13. Rabbas, O. (2010) ‘Writing, Memory and Wisdom: The Critique of Writing in the Phaedrus’, Symbolae Osloenses, Norwegian Journal of Greek and Latin Studies, Volume 84, Issue 1.
14. Rinon, Y. (1992) ‘The Rhetoric of Jacques Derrida I: Plato’s Pharmacy’, The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 46, No 2 (Dec), pp.369-386.Serracino Inglott, P. (1987) Beginning Philosophy, Malta: Media Centre.
15. Taylor, A.E. (1960) Plato The Man and His Work, Methuen: University Paperbacks.
16. Werner, D. (2010) ‘Rhetoric and Philosophy in Plato’s “Phaedrus”’, Greece and Rome, Second Series, Vol 57, No 1 (April), pp. 21-46.