Çocuklara Yönelik Perioperatif Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Listesi Kullanımının Komplikasyon Gelişimine Etkisi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 38 - 44, 01.05.2016

Neriman Turan Mantar Şeyda Seren İntepeler

Öz

Giriş: Hastanelerde görülen istenmeyen olayların yarıdan fazlası cerrahi bakım ile ilişkilidir ve bu olayların en az yarısı önlenebilir hatalardır. Amaç: Bu araştırma, bir üniversite hastanesinin çocuk cerrahi kliniğinde perioperatif güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi kullanımının komplikasyon gelişimine etkisini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Kesitsel ve tanımlayıcı türdeki araştırmanın örneklemine, bir üniversite hastanesinin çocuk cerrahi kliniğinde ameliyat olan 0-16 yaş arası hastalar alınmıştır (n=217). Veriler ‘Hasta Bilgi ve Komplikasyon Formu,’ Ameliyat Öncesi Dönem Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Listesi Formu,’ ‘Ameliyathane Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Listesi Formu’ ve ‘Ameliyat Sonrası Dönem Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Listesi Formu’ ile toplanmıştır. Çalışmada, 117 hastaya güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi perioperatif dönemde (ameliyat öncesi, sırası ve sonrası) uygulanmıştır. Yüz hastaya hiçbir aşamada güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi uygulanmamıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde sayı, yüzde, ki kare, Fisher kesin ki-kare testi ve kappa analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Hastalarda gelişen komplikasyon oranı; güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi uygulananlarda %4.3, kontrol listesi uygulanmayanlarda %14.0 olarak bulunmuştur. Güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi uygulanan ve uygulanmayan hastalarda gelişen komplikasyonlar arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır (p=.011). Sonuç: Güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi kullanımı çocuklarda görülen komplikasyon oranını azaltmaktadır. Hastanelerde çocuklara yönelik güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesinin oluşturulması ve uygulanması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hasta Güvenliği, Güvenli Cerrahi, Çocuk Cerrahisi, Kontrol Listesi, Komplikasyon

Effect of Using Pediatric Perioperative Safe Surgical Checklist on Complication Development

Öz

Background: More than half of the adverse events seen in hospitals are associated with surgical care and almost half of these incidents are
avoidable errors. Objectives: This study was conducted in order to analyze the effect of using a perioperative safe surgery checklist on the
rate of development of complications in a pediatric surgical clinic of a university hospital. Methods: Patients sixteen years old and younger
who were operated in a pediatric surgical clinic of a university hospital were included in the sample of the cross-sectional descriptive study
(n = 217). The data were collected via “Patient Information and Complication Form”, “Preoperative Period Safe Surgery Checklist Form”,
“Operation Room Safe Surgery Checklist Form” and “Postoperative Period Safe Surgery Checklist Form”. 117 patients were treated with
safe surgery checklist in the perioperative period (pre-operative, intraoperative and post-operative). One hundered patients were not treated
with safe surgery checklist during any period. Number, percentage, chi-square, Fisher exact chi-square tests and kappa analysis were used in
the data evaluation. Results: Complication incidence rates in patients were found to be 4.3% in those treated with safe surgical checklist,
14%. The difference between the complications that developed in patients who were treated with safe surgical checklist and patients who
were found to be statistically significant (p = .011). Conclusions: Safe surgery checklist use reduces the rate of complications in children.
The creation of safe surgery checklist is recommended for children in hospitals and implementation

Anahtar Kelimeler

Patient Safety, Safe Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Checklist, Complication.

Kaynakça

• AORN (2011). Recommendations for Perioperative Patient Hand-Offs, http://www.aorn.org/search.aspx?searchtext=SBAR%20communication#axzz2Bxe1rFDW, Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2012.
• Askarian, M., Kouchak F., Palenik, C. J. (2011). Effect of surgical safety checklists on postoperative morbidityand mortality rates. Shiraz, Faghihy Hospital, a 1-Year Study. Quality Manage Health Care, 20(4): 293-297.
• Borchard, A., Schwappach, D. L., Barbir, A., Bezzola, P. (2012). Systematic review of the effectiveness, complianc eand critical factors for ımplementation of safety checklists in surgery. Annals of Surgery, 256(6): 925-33.
• Catre, D., Lopes, M. F., Madrigal, A., Oliveiros, B., Cabrita, A. S., Viana, J. S., et al. (2013). Predictors of major postoperative complications in neonatal surgery. Journal of the Brazilian College of Surgeon, 40(5): 363-369.
• Dunsford, J. (2009). Structured communication ımprovement patient safety with SBAR. Nursing for Women's Health, 13(5): 384-390.
• Edomwonyl, N. P., Ekwere, I., Egbekun, R., Eluwa, B. (2006). Anesthesia-related complications in children. Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiolog, 18(5): 915-27.
• Hadary, S., Sallam, M., Salem, S. S, Zaki, H. (2014). Impact of a World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist implementation during urgent operations on compliance with basic standards of care and occurrence of complications. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4(2): 20-26.
• Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., et al. (2009). Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medical, 360(5): 491-499.
• Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A. H., Dellinger, E. P., et al. (2011). Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Quality and Safety, 20:102-107.
• Joint Commission. (2011). Facts About The Universal Protocol. http://www.Jointcommission.org/Facts about the Universal Protocol. Erişim Tarihi: 01.09.2013.
• Kable, A. K., Gibberd, R. W., Spigelman, A. D. (2002). Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Aug;14(4): 269-76.
• Levy, S. M., Senter, C. E., Hawkins, R. B., Zhao, J. Y., Doody, K., Kao, L. S., et al. (2012). Implementing a surgical checklist: more than checking a box. Journal of Surgery, Sep;152(3): 331-6.
• Lepanluoma, M., Takala, R., Kotkansalo, A., Rahi, M., Ikonen, T. S. (2013). Surgical safety checklist is associated with improved operating room safety culture, reduced wound complications, and unplanned readmissions in a pilot study in neurosurgery. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, Mar;103(1): 66-72.
• Mattioli, G., Avanzini, S., Pini-Prato, A., Buffa, P., Guida, E., Rapuzzi, G., et al. (2009). Risk management in Pediatric Surgery. Pediatric Surgery International, 25(8): 683-9.
• Maruthachalam, K., Bunn, S. K., Jaffray, B. (2011). Complications following restorative proctocolectomy in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 46(2): 336-341.
• National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF). “Patient Safety Definition. http://www.npsf.org/rc/mp/definitions.php.” Erişim Tarihi:11.05.2013.
• Norton, E. K., Rangel, S. J. (2010). Implementing a pediatric surgical safety checklist in the OR and beyond. AORN Journal, 92(1): 61- 71.
• Performans Yönetimi ve Kalite Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı (2011). Güvenli cerrahi kontrol listesi uygulama rehberi. http://www.Kalite.Saglik.Gov.Tr/Content/Files/Guvenli_Cerrahi_2011/Guvenli_Cerrahi_Kontrol_Listesi_Uygulama_Rehb eri.Pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2012.
• Proctor, M. L., Pastore, J., Gerstle, J. T., and Langer, J. C. (2003). Incidence of medical error and adverse outcomes on a pediatric general surgery service. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Sep;38(9):136-65.
• Raval, M. V., Dillon, P., Bruny, J. L., Ko, C. Y., Hall, B. L., Moss, R. L., et al. (2011). American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program pediatric: a phase 1 report. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Jan;212(1):1-11.
• Rizzo, E. (2013). Top 10 patient safety issues for 2014. Infection Control and Clinical Quality, Dec;03:1-24. Sewell, M., Adebibe, M., Jayakumar, P., Jowett, C., Kong, K., Vemulapalli, K., et al. (2011). Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. Journal of in Orthopaedics, Jun;35(6):897-901.
• Thomas, E. J., Studdert, D., Burstin, H., et al. (2000). Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Medical Care, Mar;38(3):261-71.
• Townsend, S. R., Hall, M., Jenkins, K. J., Roberson, D. W., Rangel, S. J. (2010). Analysis of adverse events in pediatric surgery using criteria validated from the adult population: justifying the need for pediatric-focused outcome measures. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Jun;45(6):1126-36.
• Vries, E. N., Ramrattan, M. A., Smorenburg, S. M., Gouma, D. J., and Boermeester, M. A. (2008). The incidence and nature of in hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Quality Safe Health Care, Jun;17(3):216-23.
• Vries, E. N., Prins, H. A., Crolla, R., et al. (2010). Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. New England Journal of Medical, 363:1928-37.
• Vries, E. N., Prins, H. A., Bennink, M. C., Neijenhuis, P., Stijn, I., Helden, S. H., et al. (2012). Nature and timing of incidents intercepted by the SURPASS checklist in surgical patients. BMJ Quality and Safety, Jun;21(6):503-8.
• Weiser, T. G., Regenbogen, S. E., Thompson, K. D., et al. (2008). An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategybased on available data. Lancet, 372:139-44.
• Weiser, T. G., Haynes, A. B., Lashoher, A., Dziekan, G., Boorman, D. J., Berry, W. R., et al. (2010). Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 22:365-70.
• Weinberg, A. C., Huang, L., Jiang, H., Tinloy, B., Raskas, M. D., Penna, F. J., et al. (2011). Perioperative risk factors for major complications in pediatric surgery: a study in surgical risk assessment for children. Journal American College Surgery, 212(5):768-78.