BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 105 - 135, 08.07.2014

Tuğba Gökdoğan Gül

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de düzey 2 bölgeleri için istihdamın belirleyicilerini tespit etmek amacıyla, mekânsal komşuluk ilişkisinin istihdamın büyümesi üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan veri seti yıllık olup, 2004-2008 yılları arasını kapsamaktadır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, beşeri sermayenin eğitim düzeyinin kalitesi ve girişimcilik potansiyeli istihdamın büyümesine pozitif etki göstermektedir. Firmaların yenilik düzeylerinin geliştirilmesinin, istihdama olumlu etkisi olduğu; sonuç olarak Türkiye’de istihdam büyümesinin, mekânsal komşuluk ilişkisinden etkilendiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İstihdam Bölgesel Kalkınma Bölgesel Büyüme Mekânsal Komşuluk İlişkileri Mekânsal Ekonometrik Analiz

Kaynakça

  • ANDERSSON, E., ANDERSTIG, C., HARSMAN, B. (1990), “Knowledge and communications infrastructure and regional economic growth”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 20(3): 359-376.
  • ANSELIN, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics, Methods and Models, Studies in Operational Regional Science, Kluwer Acedemic Publishers, Netherlands.
  • ANSELIN, L. (2001), “Spatial Econometrics”, A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics Blackwell.
  • ANSELIN, L. (2003), “Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers and Spatial Econometrics”, International Regional Science Review, 26(2),153‐166.
  • ANSELIN, L., BERA, A. (1998), “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics”, Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, (Ed. A. Ullah, D. E. Giles), Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • ANSELIN, L., REY, S. (1991), “Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models”, Geographical Analysis, 23(2), 112-131.
  • ANSELIN, L., VARGA, A., ACS, Z. (1997), “Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations”, Journal of urban economics, 42(3), 422-448.
  • ARSLAN, K. (2005), “Bölgesel Kalkınma Farklılıklarının Giderilmesinde Etkin Bir Araç: Bölgesel Planlama ve Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansları”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7): 275-294.
  • AUDRETSCH, D., FELDMAN, M. (1996), “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production”, The American Economic Review, 86(3): 630-640.
  • AUDRETSCH, D., KEILBACH, M. (2004), “Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5): 605-616.
  • AUDRETSCH, D., KEILBACH, M. (2005), “Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth”, The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3): 457-469.
  • BARRO, R. (2001), “Human capital and growth”, The American Economic Review, 91(2), 12-17.
  • BOSMA, N., LEVIE, J. (2009); “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Executive Report”, http://www.gemconsortium.org/docs/download/265, pp.5-72
  • BRAUNERHJELM, P., BORGMAN B. (2004), “Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975-99”, Regional Studies, 38(8): 929-948.
  • ÇELEBİOĞLU, F., DALL'ERBA, S. (2010), “Spatial disparities across the regions of Turkey: an exploratory spatial data analysis”, The Annals of Regional Science, 45(2):379-400.
  • DOMÉNECH, R. (2006), “Human capital in growth regressions: how much difference does data quality make?”, Journal of the European Economic, 4(1): 1-36.
  • EBERTS, R. (1986), “Estimating the contribution of urban public infrastructure to regional growth”, Working Paper, Cleveland: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
  • EBERTS, R. (1990), “Public infrastructure and regional economic development”, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 26: 15-27.
  • EISNER, R. (2009), “Infrastructure and regional economic performance: comment”, New England Economic Review (September/October): 47-58.
  • ELHORST, P. (2003), “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models”, International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 244-268.
  • FİLİZTEKİN, A. (2007), “Regional Unemployment in Turkey”, Koç University Working Paper Series, No.1998/08.
  • FLORAX, R., VLIST, A. (2003), “Spatial Econometric Data Analysis: Moving Beyond Traditional Models”, International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 223-243.
  • FREXEDAS, O.V., VAYÁ E. (2005), “Financial Contagion Between Economies: an Exploraty Spatial Analysis”, Estudios de Economia Applicada.
  • GEZİCİ F. (2006), “New Regional Definition and Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey Related to the Regional Policies of EU” The Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 12(1): 10-32.
  • GEZİCİ, F., HEWINGS G. (2003), “Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey”, 43rd Congress of European Regional Science, Finland.
  • GLASMEIER, A. (1991), ‘‘The High-Tech Potential. Economic Development in Rural America’’, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, 225 p.
  • GLOMM, G., RAVIKUMAR B. (1994), “Public investment in infrastructure in a simple growth model”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(6): 1173-1187.
  • GROSSMAN, G., HELPMAN, E. (1994), “Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 23-44.
  • GROSSMAN, G., M. HELPMAN, E. (1992), “Innovation And Growth in the Global Economy” , Cambridge Ma, MIT Press.
  • HOLTZ-EAKIN, D., KAO, C. (2003), “Entrepreneruship and economic growth: the proof is in the productivity”. Syracuse University Center for Policy Research Working Paper, No. 50, pp 1-33.
  • JARREAY, J., PONCET, S. (2012), “Export sophistication and economic growth: evidence from China, Journal of Development Economics”, V.97, Issue 2, pp 281-292.
  • KARAGÖL E., AKGEYİK, T. (2010), “Türkiye’de İstihdam Durumu: Genel Eğilimler”, http://arsiv.setav.org/Ups/dosya/35324.pdf, (28.12.2013).
  • KÖSE, S. vd., (2011), “Türkiye’de Farklı Bölgesel Gelişme Performansları Üzerine Bir Veri Zarflama Analizi (2004-2008)”, TURKRES 2011, Kalkınmada Bölgesel Dinamikler Sempozyumu , Denzli,101-125.
  • LAABAS, B., RAZZAK, W. (2011), “Economic Growth and The Quality of Human Capital”, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28727/, (13.02.2014).
  • LAUKKANEN, M. (2000), “Exploring Alternative Approaches in HighLevel Entrepreneurship Education: Creating Micromechanisms for Endogenous Regional Growth”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(1), 25-47.
  • LEE, S., FLORIDA, R., ACS, Z. (2004), “Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation”, Regional studies, 38(8): 879-891.
  • LESAGE, J.P., PACE, R.K. (2009), Introduction to Spatial Econometrics, Taylor & Francis, USA.
  • LUCAS, R. (1988), “On The Mechanics Of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1988) 3-42.
  • MALECKI, E. (1997), “Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional, and national change”, Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  • MUNNELL A., COOK L. (1990), “How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance?, Is There a Shortfall in Public Capital Investment?”, Proceedings of a Conference, 69-112.
  • MUNNELL, A. (1992), “Policy watch: infrastructure investment and economic growth”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(4): 189-198.
  • ÖCAL, N., YILDIRIM, J. (2008), “Türkiye illerinin istihdam performansı: mekansal veri analizi”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 23(266): 5-20.
  • SAXENIAN, A. (1990), “Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley”, California Management Review, 33(1): 89-112.
  • SOUKIAZIS, E., ANTUNES, M. (2011), “Is Foreign Trade İmportant For Regional Growth?” Empirical Evidence From Portugal. Economic Modelling, 28 (3), 1363-1373.
  • TÜİK (2010), “Göç İstatistikleri”, www.tuik.gov.tr (19.12.2013).
  • YILDIRIM, J., ÖZYILDIRIM, S., ÖCAL, N. (2009), “Regional Income Inequality and Economic Convergence in Turkey: A Spatial Data Analysis”, International Regional Science Review, 32(2009): 221-254.
  • YOUNG, A. (1995), “The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the east asian growth experience”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 641-680.
  • ZEREN, F. (2010), “Mekânsal Etkileşim Analizi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 12, 18–39

DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR TURKEY: NUTS-2 DISTRICT LEVEL SPATIAL ANALYSIS APPLICATION

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 105 - 135, 08.07.2014

Tuğba Gökdoğan Gül

Öz

The purpose of this study is to identify the determinants of employment for regions atNUTS2 level in Turkey by analyzing how the growth rate of employment is affected by thespatial neighborhood. The data set covers the 2004 and 2008 period for 26 regions. Thefindings suggest that the quality of education level of human capital has a positive effect onemployment growth. Innovation performance of firms was also found to have a positiveeffect on employment. This study forward that spatial neighborhood affects the growth ofemployment in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Employment Regional Development Regional Growth Spatial Neighborhood Relations Spatial Econometric Analysis

Kaynakça

  • ANDERSSON, E., ANDERSTIG, C., HARSMAN, B. (1990), “Knowledge and communications infrastructure and regional economic growth”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 20(3): 359-376.
  • ANSELIN, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics, Methods and Models, Studies in Operational Regional Science, Kluwer Acedemic Publishers, Netherlands.
  • ANSELIN, L. (2001), “Spatial Econometrics”, A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics Blackwell.
  • ANSELIN, L. (2003), “Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers and Spatial Econometrics”, International Regional Science Review, 26(2),153‐166.
  • ANSELIN, L., BERA, A. (1998), “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics”, Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, (Ed. A. Ullah, D. E. Giles), Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • ANSELIN, L., REY, S. (1991), “Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models”, Geographical Analysis, 23(2), 112-131.
  • ANSELIN, L., VARGA, A., ACS, Z. (1997), “Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations”, Journal of urban economics, 42(3), 422-448.
  • ARSLAN, K. (2005), “Bölgesel Kalkınma Farklılıklarının Giderilmesinde Etkin Bir Araç: Bölgesel Planlama ve Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansları”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7): 275-294.
  • AUDRETSCH, D., FELDMAN, M. (1996), “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production”, The American Economic Review, 86(3): 630-640.
  • AUDRETSCH, D., KEILBACH, M. (2004), “Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5): 605-616.
  • AUDRETSCH, D., KEILBACH, M. (2005), “Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth”, The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3): 457-469.
  • BARRO, R. (2001), “Human capital and growth”, The American Economic Review, 91(2), 12-17.
  • BOSMA, N., LEVIE, J. (2009); “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Executive Report”, http://www.gemconsortium.org/docs/download/265, pp.5-72
  • BRAUNERHJELM, P., BORGMAN B. (2004), “Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975-99”, Regional Studies, 38(8): 929-948.
  • ÇELEBİOĞLU, F., DALL'ERBA, S. (2010), “Spatial disparities across the regions of Turkey: an exploratory spatial data analysis”, The Annals of Regional Science, 45(2):379-400.
  • DOMÉNECH, R. (2006), “Human capital in growth regressions: how much difference does data quality make?”, Journal of the European Economic, 4(1): 1-36.
  • EBERTS, R. (1986), “Estimating the contribution of urban public infrastructure to regional growth”, Working Paper, Cleveland: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
  • EBERTS, R. (1990), “Public infrastructure and regional economic development”, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 26: 15-27.
  • EISNER, R. (2009), “Infrastructure and regional economic performance: comment”, New England Economic Review (September/October): 47-58.
  • ELHORST, P. (2003), “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models”, International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 244-268.
  • FİLİZTEKİN, A. (2007), “Regional Unemployment in Turkey”, Koç University Working Paper Series, No.1998/08.
  • FLORAX, R., VLIST, A. (2003), “Spatial Econometric Data Analysis: Moving Beyond Traditional Models”, International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 223-243.
  • FREXEDAS, O.V., VAYÁ E. (2005), “Financial Contagion Between Economies: an Exploraty Spatial Analysis”, Estudios de Economia Applicada.
  • GEZİCİ F. (2006), “New Regional Definition and Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey Related to the Regional Policies of EU” The Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 12(1): 10-32.
  • GEZİCİ, F., HEWINGS G. (2003), “Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey”, 43rd Congress of European Regional Science, Finland.
  • GLASMEIER, A. (1991), ‘‘The High-Tech Potential. Economic Development in Rural America’’, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, 225 p.
  • GLOMM, G., RAVIKUMAR B. (1994), “Public investment in infrastructure in a simple growth model”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(6): 1173-1187.
  • GROSSMAN, G., HELPMAN, E. (1994), “Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 23-44.
  • GROSSMAN, G., M. HELPMAN, E. (1992), “Innovation And Growth in the Global Economy” , Cambridge Ma, MIT Press.
  • HOLTZ-EAKIN, D., KAO, C. (2003), “Entrepreneruship and economic growth: the proof is in the productivity”. Syracuse University Center for Policy Research Working Paper, No. 50, pp 1-33.
  • JARREAY, J., PONCET, S. (2012), “Export sophistication and economic growth: evidence from China, Journal of Development Economics”, V.97, Issue 2, pp 281-292.
  • KARAGÖL E., AKGEYİK, T. (2010), “Türkiye’de İstihdam Durumu: Genel Eğilimler”, http://arsiv.setav.org/Ups/dosya/35324.pdf, (28.12.2013).
  • KÖSE, S. vd., (2011), “Türkiye’de Farklı Bölgesel Gelişme Performansları Üzerine Bir Veri Zarflama Analizi (2004-2008)”, TURKRES 2011, Kalkınmada Bölgesel Dinamikler Sempozyumu , Denzli,101-125.
  • LAABAS, B., RAZZAK, W. (2011), “Economic Growth and The Quality of Human Capital”, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28727/, (13.02.2014).
  • LAUKKANEN, M. (2000), “Exploring Alternative Approaches in HighLevel Entrepreneurship Education: Creating Micromechanisms for Endogenous Regional Growth”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(1), 25-47.
  • LEE, S., FLORIDA, R., ACS, Z. (2004), “Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation”, Regional studies, 38(8): 879-891.
  • LESAGE, J.P., PACE, R.K. (2009), Introduction to Spatial Econometrics, Taylor & Francis, USA.
  • LUCAS, R. (1988), “On The Mechanics Of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1988) 3-42.
  • MALECKI, E. (1997), “Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional, and national change”, Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  • MUNNELL A., COOK L. (1990), “How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance?, Is There a Shortfall in Public Capital Investment?”, Proceedings of a Conference, 69-112.
  • MUNNELL, A. (1992), “Policy watch: infrastructure investment and economic growth”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(4): 189-198.
  • ÖCAL, N., YILDIRIM, J. (2008), “Türkiye illerinin istihdam performansı: mekansal veri analizi”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 23(266): 5-20.
  • SAXENIAN, A. (1990), “Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley”, California Management Review, 33(1): 89-112.
  • SOUKIAZIS, E., ANTUNES, M. (2011), “Is Foreign Trade İmportant For Regional Growth?” Empirical Evidence From Portugal. Economic Modelling, 28 (3), 1363-1373.
  • TÜİK (2010), “Göç İstatistikleri”, www.tuik.gov.tr (19.12.2013).
  • YILDIRIM, J., ÖZYILDIRIM, S., ÖCAL, N. (2009), “Regional Income Inequality and Economic Convergence in Turkey: A Spatial Data Analysis”, International Regional Science Review, 32(2009): 221-254.
  • YOUNG, A. (1995), “The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the east asian growth experience”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 641-680.
  • ZEREN, F. (2010), “Mekânsal Etkileşim Analizi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 12, 18–39
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA37ZE93AP
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Tuğba Gökdoğan Gül Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 8 Temmuz 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Gül, T. G. (2014). TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 105-135.
AMA Gül TG. TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Temmuz 2014;29(1):105-135.
Chicago Gül, Tuğba Gökdoğan. “TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 29, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2014): 105-35.
EndNote Gül TG (01 Temmuz 2014) TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 29 1 105–135.
IEEE T. G. Gül, “TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 29, sy. 1, ss. 105–135, 2014.
ISNAD Gül, Tuğba Gökdoğan. “TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 29/1 (Temmuz 2014), 105-135.
JAMA Gül TG. TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;29:105–135.
MLA Gül, Tuğba Gökdoğan. “TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 29, sy. 1, 2014, ss. 105-3.
Vancouver Gül TG. TÜRKİYE İÇİN İSTİHDAMIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: İBBS-2 BÖLGE DÜZEYİ, MEKÂNSAL ANALİZ UYGULAMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;29(1):105-3.