Psychologıcal Ownershıp: A Model Proposal For Organızatıonal Area

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 167 - 200, 13.07.2017

Zeki Uçar

https://doi.org/10.24988/deuiibf.2017321552

Öz

Nowadays, an increasing number of research reveals that employees’ sense of ownership to their own work and organization has positive outcomes on organizational outcomes. But, the issues of what psychological ownership (PO) phenomenon exactly means, in which forms it emerges, how it develops in the organizational field and what their organizational outputs are, have not been investigated in depth. Given the lack of conceptualization of PO in the literature, this study aims to contribute to the theory building process of PO in the field of organization. By introducing th enique model in this paper, therelation ship among variables were examined based on the theoretical analysis. The current review states that it is difficult to claim that a robust theory and framework has been developed in conceptualizing PO construct and its outcomes in the existing literature. This study is important because it adopts a holistic view on PO by providing a solid foundation on the topic to contribute to its theorization and calls for an emprical research in the future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psychological Ownership, Organizational Environment, Employee Attitudes and Behaviors

Psikolojik Sahiplenme: Örgütsel Alana İlişkin Bir Model Önerisi

Öz

Günümüzde artan sayıda araştırma işgörenlerin örgütlerini ve işlerini psikolojik olarak sahiplenmelerinin, olumlu örgütsel çıktılar üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak psikolojik sahiplenme olgusunun tam olarak ne olduğu, örgütsel alanda nasıl geliştiği, hangi formlarda ortaya çıktığı ve örgütsel çıktılarının ne olduğu konusunda araştırmaların yeterli olgunluğa erişmediği araştırmacılar tarafından sıklıkla dile getirilmektedir. PS (Psikolojik Sahiplenme) olgusunun teorileşmesi yönündeki eksikliğe bağlı olarak bu çalışmada PS olgusunun örgütsel alan içerisinde teorileşmesine katkı sağlanması amaçlamaktadır. Özgün bir model üzerinden tasarımlanan çalışmada model üzerindeki değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler kuramsal analizlere bağlı olarak ele alınmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna bağlı olarak olgunun kavramsallaşması, örgütsel alan içerisinde ne şekilde geliştiği ve örgütsel alana ilişkin çıktıları üzerinde sağlam bir teorinin oluştuğu söylemek zordur. PS olgusunu örgütsel alan içerisinde bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla ele alan bu çalışma olgunun teorileşmesine ilişkin yapılacak ampirik  çalışmalara kuramsal bir altyapı hazırladığı için önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psikolojik Sahiplenme, Örgütsel Ortam, İşgören Tutum ve Davranışları

Kaynakça

• Asatryan, V. S., Oh, H. (2008). Psychological Ownership Theory: An Exploratory Application in The Restaurant Industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32: 363-386.
• Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 30(2), 173-191.
• Avey, J. B.,Wernsing, T. S., Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring The Process of Ethical Leadership: The Mediating Role of Employee Voice and Psychological Ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.
• Barki, H.,Paré, G., Sicotte, C. (2008). Linking IT Implementation and Acceptance Via The Construct of Psychological Ownership of İnformation Technology. Journal of Information Technology, 23(4), 269-280.
• Bernhard, F., O'Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological Ownership in Small Family-Owned Businesses: Leadership Style and Nonfamily-Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384.
• Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 577-594.
• Buchko, A. A. (1992). Effects of Employee Ownership on Employee Attitudes a Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives. Work and Occupations, 19(1), 59-78.
• Chi, N. W., Han, T. S. (2008). Exploring The Linkages Between Formal Ownership And Psychologica Lownership for The Organization: The Mediating Role of Organizational Justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizationa lPsychology, 81(4), 691-711.
• Etzioni, A. (1991). The Socio-Economics of Property. In F. W. Rudmin (Ed.), To Have Possessions: A Hand Book on Ownership and Property. Special Issue, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 465-468.
• Florkowski, G. W. (1987). The Organizational Impact of Profit Sharing. Academy of management Review, 12(4), 622-636.
• Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Khan, M. A., &Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Transformationalleadership,
• employeeengagementandperformance: Mediatingeffect of psychologicalownership. Africanjournal of businessmanagement, 5(17), 7391-7403.
• Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., Chang, A. (2010). Employee Participation in Decision Making, Psychological Ownership and Knowledge Sharing: Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in Taiwanese High-Tech Organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2218-2233.
• Kaur, D.,Sambasivan, M., Kumar, N. (2013). Effect of Spiritual İntelligence, Emotional İntelligence, Psychological Ownership and Burnout on Caring Behaviour of Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study. Journal of clinicalnursing, 22(21-22), 3192-3202.
• Kubzansky, P. E., Druskat, V. U. (1993). Psychological Sense of Ownership in Theworkplace: Conceptualization and Measurement. In Annual Meeting of The American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
• Lee, Y., Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability Design and Psychological Ownership of A Virtual World. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269-308.
• Lerner, J. S., Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting Fortheeffects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275.
• Liu, J.,Wang, H., Hui, C., Lee, C. (2012). Psychological Ownership: How Having Control Matters. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 869-895.
• Mayhew, M. G.,Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., Gardner, J. (2007). A Study of The Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Ownership in Organizational Settings. The Journal of social psychology, 147(5), 477-500.
• O’driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., Coghlan, A. M. (2006). The psychology of ownership work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 388-416.
• Olckers, C., DuPlessis, Y. (2012). Psychological Ownership: A Managerial Construct for Talent Retention and Organisational Effectiveness. African Journal of Business Management, 6(7), 2585.
• Pierce, J. L., Furo, C. A. (1991). Employee ownership: Implications for management. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 32-43.
• Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., Morgan, S. (1991). Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects. Academy of Management Review,16(1), 121-144.
• Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I. (2010). Collective Psychological Ownership within The Work and Organizational Context: Construct Introduction and Elaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 810-834.
• Pierce, J. L.,&Rodgers, L. (2004). Thepsychology of ownershipandworker-ownerproductivity. Group&Organization Management, 29(5), 588-613.
• Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., Cummings, A. (2009). Psychological Ownership Within The Job Design Context: Revision of The Job Characteristics Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 477-496.
• Pierce, J. L.,Kostova, T., Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management Review,26(2), 298-310.
• Pierce, J. L.,Kostova, T., Dirks, K. T. (2003). The State of Psychologica Lownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84.
• Pierce, J. L.,O'driscoll, M. P., Coghlan, A. M. (2004). Work Environment Structure and Psychologica Lownership: The Mediating Effects of Control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507-534.
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐Regulation and The Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self‐Determination, and Will?. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1586.
• Sieger, P.,Zellweger, T., Aquino, K. (2013). Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners through Psychological Ownership. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 361-388.
• Van Dyne, L., Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
• Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of Its Consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226.
• Wagner, S. H.,Parker, C. P., Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Employees That Think and Act Like Owners: Effects of Ownership Beliefs and Behaviors on Organizational Effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 847-871.
• Zhu, H.,Chen, C. C., Li, X., Zhou, Y. (2013). From Personal Relationship to Psychological Ownership: The Importance of Manager–Owner Relationship Closeness in Family Businesses. Management andOrganizationReview, 9(2), 295-318.