ANDEZİTLERDEKİ AKMA BANTLARININ MAKASLAMA DAYANIM PARAMETRELERİNİN STATİK VE DİNAMİK KOŞULLAR ALTINDA BELİRLENMESİ

Öz

Stability and deformation analyses of geotechnical projects such as tunnels, underground excavations and rock slopes require reliable data about the behavior of discontinuities (joints, fractures, bedding planes and etc.). Therefore, shear box tests are widely used in rock mechanics applications. In this study, several static and dynamic shear box tests were carried out both over flow bands of the andesites which cover a large area in the northern part of Izmir Bay. Shear box tests were conducted under both static and dynamic conditions on rectangular planes with a dimension of 400 x 200 mm. As a result of these tests, normal displacement-normal stress, shearing displacement-shearing stress and normal displacement-shear strength correlations were obtained. Also, peak and residual shear strength values, base friction angle and residual friction angle were found and the results were interpreted. Thus, the shear strength properties of the flow band structures can be given with more accuracy. Based on the new findings, more realistic solutions will be obtained in numerical analyses and simulation models aiming at determining the stability of underground excavations and engineering projects on the ground surface will be more reliable

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Shear test Shear strength Dynamic testing Flow bands Andesite

DETERMINATION OF THE SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS OF FLOW BAND STRUCTURES IN ANDESITES UNDER STATIC AND DYNAMIC CONDITIONS

Öz

Tüneller, yeraltı kazıları kaya şevleri gibi jeoteknik projelere ait stabilite ve deformasyon analizleri, süreksizliklerin (eklemler, çatlaklar, tabakalanma düzlemleri vb.) davranışları hakkında güvenilir verilere ihtiyaç duymaktadır. Bu nedenle makaslama kutusu deneyleri, kaya mekaniği uygulamalarında yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, İzmir Körfezi kuzeyinde geniş alanlar kaplayan andezitlerdeki akma bantları üzerinde statik ve dinamik koşullarda makaslama kutusu deneyleri yapılmıştır. Makaslama deneyleri 400 x 200 mm dikdörtgen şekilli geniş yüzeyler üzerinde statik ve dinamik koşullarda yapılmıştır. Statik koşullarda yapılan deneylerde, zaman – yer değiştirme; zaman – gerilme; makaslama yer değiştirmesi – gerilme; makaslama yer değiştirmesi – normal yer değiştirme; makaslama yer değiştirmesi – makaslama gerilmesi; normal gerilme – makaslama gerilmesi ilişkileri elde edilerek doruk ve artık makaslama dayanımları, temel sürtünme açısı ve artık sürtünme açısı değerleri bulunarak sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır. Dinamik koşullarda yapılan deneylerde ise, makaslama yer değiştirmesi – zaman, makaslama gerilmesi – zaman, makaslama yer değiştirmesi – makaslama gerilmesi – zaman, makaslama gerilmesi – makaslama yer değiştirmesi, normal yer değiştirme – zaman ilişkileri elde edilmiş ve sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır. Andezitlerdeki akma bantlarında yapılan makaslama kutusu deneyleri sonucunda; akma bantlarının dayanım özellikleri daha gerçekçi olarak tanımlanacak, nümerik analiz programları ve nümerik simülasyonlar kullanılarak depremlere bağlı olarak andezitlerdeki yer altı ve yerüstü kaya yapılarının duraylılığını belirlemeye yönelik modellemelerde daha gerçekçi çözümler elde edilecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Makaslama deneyi Makaslama dayanımı Dinamik test Akma bantı Andezit

Kaynakça

1. Ahola, M.P., Hsiung, S.M. and Kana, D.D., 1996. Experimental study on dynamic behavior of rock joints. Developments Engineering. O. Stephansson, Jing, L., and Tsang, C.F. (Eds). Elsevier Science. 79: 467-494.
2. Asadi, M.S. and Rasouli, V., 2012. Physical simulation of asperity degradation using laboratorial shear tests of artificial fractures. Rock Engineering and Technology for Construction. ISRM International Symposium. Stockholm: 1-14.
3. ASTM 2002. Performing laboratory direct shear strength tests of rock specimens under constant normal force. D-5607: 1-12.
4. Bakhtar, K. and Barton, N., 1984. Large scale static and dynamic friction experiments. Proceedings of the 25th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers: 457-466.
5. Barbero, M., Barla, G. and Zaninetti, A., 1996. Dynamic shear strength of rock joints subjected to impulse loading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 33 (2), 141-151.
6. Barla G, Barla M, Camusso M, Martinotti, M.E., 2007. Setting up a new direct shear testing apparatus. In: Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, July 2007, Taylor & Francis, vol 1, pp 415–418.
7. Barla G., Barla M., and Martinotti M.E., 2010. Development of a new direct shear testing apparatus. Rock engineering, 43 (1), 117-122.
8. Barla, G., Barbero, M., Scavia, C., et al., 1990. Direct shear testing of single joints under dynamic loading. Rock joints, Proceedings of International symposium. N. Barton, and Stephansson, O., Eds. Loen, Balkema, Rotterdam: 447-454.

9. Barton, N., 1976. The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 13, 255-279.
10. Belem, T., Mountaka, S. and Homand, F., 2004. Generalized directional peak shear stress criterion for dilatant rock joints. 57th Conference. Quebec: 1-8.
11. Belem, T., Souley, M. and Homand, F., roughness degradation of rock joint wall during monotonic and cyclic shearing. Acta Geotechnica 2 (4): 227-248. surface
12. Boulon, M., 1995. A 3-D direct shear device for testing the mechanical behaviour and the hydraulic conductivity of rock joint. Proc. of the MJFR-2 conf., Vienne, Rossmanith ed., Balkema. 407-413,
13. Brady, B.H.G. and Brown, E.T., 2005. Underground edition), Publishers. for (Third Kluwer Academic
14. Buzzi, O., Boulon, M., Herve, M., et al., 2008. Leaching of rock-concrete interfaces. Rock Mechanics and Rock engineering 41 (3): 445-466.
15. DGGT (German Geotechnical Society) Empfehlung Nr. 1 des Arbeitskreises Fels (revised recommendation) 2004b. Einaxiale Druckversuche an zylindrischen Gesteinsprüfkörpern (Uniaxial compression tests on rock specimens). Bautechnik 81, 825 – 834.
16. Divoux, P., Boulon, M. and Bourdarot, E., 1997. A mechanical constitutive model for rock and concrete joints under cyclic loading. Proceedings of Damage and Failure of Interfaces. H. P. Rossmanith, (Ed). Vienna, Austria: 443-450.
17. Ferrero, A.M., Migliazza, M. and Tebaldi, G., 2010. Development of a new experimental apparatus for the study of the mechanical behaviour of a rock discontinuity under monotonic and cyclic loads. Rock Engineering 43 (6), 685-695.
18. Fox, D.J., Kana, D. D. and Hsiung, S. M., 1998. Influence of interface roughness on dynamic shear behavior in jointed Rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 35 (7): 923
19. Geertsema A.J., 2002. The shear strength of planar joints in mudstone. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 39, 1045-1049.
20. Gehle C., 2002. Bruch- und scherverhalten gesteinstrennflächen dazwischenliegenden materialbrücken. In Published by Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ruhr- University Bochum. von mit
21. Gentier, S., Riss, J., Archambault, G., et al., 2000. Influence of fracture geometry on shear behavior. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37, 161-174.
22. Gomez, J.E., Filz, M.G., Ebeling, R.M., et al., 2008. Sand-to-Concrete interface response to Complex load paths in a large displacement shear box. Geotechnical Testing Journal 31 (4), 1-12.
23. Grasselli, G. and Egger, P., 2003. Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional parameters. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci 40 (1), 25-40. surface
24. Haberfield, C.M. and Seidel, J.P., 1999. Some recent advances in the modelling of soft rock joints in direct shear. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 17, 177- 195.
25. Haque, A., 1999. Shear behaviour of soft rock joints under constant normal stiffness. Published by Department of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, 1-293.
26. Hobbs, B.E., Ord, A. and Marone, C., 1990. Dynamic behaviour of rock joints. Rock joints, Proceedings of International symposium. N. Barton, and Stephansson, O., (Eds). Loen, Balkema, Rotterdam, 435-445.
27. Hoek, E., 2007. Practical Rock Engineering. RocScience: 1-237.
28. Homand-Etienne, F., Lefevre, F., Belem, T., et al., 1999. Rock joints behavior under cyclic direct shear tests. Proc. 37th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symp. Colorado U.S.A, Balkema: 399-406.
29. Huang, X., Haimson, B.C., Plesha, M.E., et al., 1993. An investigation of the mechanics of rock joints - part 1. laboratory investagation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 30 (3), 257-269.
30. Hutson, R.W. and Dowding, C.H., 1990. Joint asperity degradation during cyclic shear. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 27 (2), 109-119.
31. ISRM 1974. Suggested methods for determining Committee on standardisation of Laboratory and Field tests, pp 1– 23. strength.
32. ISRM 2007. The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, monitoring: Compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, 2007. – 2006. 1974
33. ISRM, 1981. Rock characterisation testing and monitoring ISRM suggested methods. Brown, E.T., (Editor), Pergamon Press.
34. ISRM, 1983. Suggested methods for determining the strength of rock materials in triaxial compression. Revised version. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 20, 285 – 290.
35. Jafari, M.K., Hosseini, K.A., Pellet, F., et al., 2003. Evaluation of shear strength of rock joints subjected to cyclic loading. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering 23: 619- 630.
36. Jiang, Y., Li, B. and Tanabashi, Y., 2006. Estimating the relation between surface roughness and mechanical properties of rock joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43, 837-846.
37. Jiang, Y., Xiao, J., Tanabashi, Y., et al., Development of an automated servo-controlled direct shear constant condition. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41, 275-286. a normal stiffness
38. Jing, L., Stephansson, O. and Nordlund, E., 1993. Study of rock joints conditions. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 26 (3), 215-232.
39. Kana, D.D., Fox, D.J. and Hsiung, S.M., model for dynamic shear response in natural jointed Rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 33 (4), 371-386.
40. Kim D.Y., Chun, B.S. and Yang, J.S., 2006. Development of a direct shear apparatus with rock joints and Geotechnical testing, 29 (5). tests.
41. Kim, D.Y. and Lee, Y.N., 2007. New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints using quantified parameters. 11th Congress of the International Society for Rock mechanics. Lisbon, 355-358.
42. Koca, M.Y. & Kıncal, C., 2004. Abandoned stone quarries in and around the Izmir city centre and their geoenvironmental impacts. Engineering Geology 75, 49–67.
43. Koca, M.Y., 1995. Slope stability assessment of the abandoned Andesite quarries in and around the Izmir city centre. PhD Dissertation. University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Izmir, Turkey. Eylul
44. Koca, M.Y., Ozden, G., Yavuz, A.B., Kıncal, C., Onargan, T. and Kucuk, K., 2006. Changes In Engineering Properties of Fire Exposed Marble Columns. Int. Jour. of Rock Mech.& Min. Sci., Elsevier, Vol. 43, Issue 4.
45. Kodikara, J.K. and Johnston, I.W., 1994. Shear behaviour of irregular triangular rock-concrete joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 31 (4), 313- 322.
46. Konietzky, H., Frühwirt, T., Luge, H., 2012b. A new large dynamic rockmechanical direct shear box device. In: Rock Mechanics Rock Engineering, 45 (3): 427-432.
47. Konietzky, H., Frühwirt, T., Nguyen, V.M., 2012a. GS 1000: A new large rockmechanical shear box device for dynamic and HM-coupled testing under extreme strong froces. In: Proc. EUROCK 2012, 1-9.
48. Lee, H.S., Park, Y.J., Cho, T.F., et al., 2001. degradation on the mechanical behavior of rough rock joints under cyclic shear loading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 38: 967-980.
49. Luge, H., 2011. Entwicklung, Aufbau und Versuchssteuerung für ein neuartiges dynamisches hydro- mechanisches Felsschergerät für extrem hohe Kräfte. Published by Geotechnical Bergakademie Freiberg. TU simulation. Publ.
50. Ohnishi, Y. and Dharmaratne, P.G.R., 1990. Shear behaviour of physical models of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions. Proceedings of the international conference on rock joints, Balkema, Rotterdam, 267- 273.
51. Qiu, X., Plesha, M.E., Huang, X., et al., 1993. An investigation of the mechancis of rock joints - Part II. Analytical investigation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 30 (3), 271-287.
52. Seidel, J.P and Haberfield, C.M., Laboratory testing of concrete-rock joints in constant normal stiffness direct shear. Geotechnical Testing, 25 (4).
53. Wang, W.H., Li, X.B., Zhang, Y.P., et al., 2007. Closure behavior of rock joint under dynamic loading. Jour. Cent. South Univ. Technol., 408-412.