COMPUTER BASED VOICE ANALYSIS ON MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS

Öz

The change in voice quality is affected by many of voice disorders that coming from pathogical conditions of voice generation organs. The aim of this study is to help that the clinicians could be diagnosed about voice disorders with non-invasive based analysis. In our work, amplitude perturbation quotient, pitch period perturbation quotient, degree of unvoiceness, Teager Energy Operators averages of wavelet transform coefficients, and higher-order statistics parameters have formed the feature vectors. The voice segments belonging to different pathological or normal classes were classified by backpropagation based multilayer perceptron networks. In backpropagation based multilayer perceptron networks, resilient, scaled-conjugate gradient, and Brodyen-Fletcher-GoldfarbShanno learning algorithms were used in training. According to the results of the simulation studies, scaled-conjugate gradient algorithm gave the best results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Voice analysis, Acoustic parameters, Wavelet transform, Higher-order statistics, Classification, Artificial neural networks

BİLGİSAYAR TABANLI SES ANALİZİNİN TIBBİ TANIDA KULLANILMASI

Öz

conditions of voice generation organs. The aim of this study is to help that the clinicians could be diagnosed about voice disorders with non-invasive based analysis. In our work, amplitude perturbation quotient, pitch period perturbation quotient, degree of unvoiceness, Teager Energy Operators averages of wavelet transform coefficients, and higher-order statistics parameters have formed the feature vectors. The voice segments belonging to different pathological or normal classes were classified by backpropagation based multilayer perceptron networks. In backpropagation based multilayer perceptron networks, resilient, scaled-conjugate gradient, and Brodyen-Fletcher-Goldfarb- Shanno learning algorithms were used in training. According to the results of the simulation studies, scaled-conjugate gradient algorithm gave the best results

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ses analizi, Akustik parametreler, Dalgacık dönüşümü, Yüksek dereceli istatistikler, Sınıflandırma, Yapay sinir ağları

Kaynakça

1. P. Boersma (1993): “Accurate Short-term Analysis of the Fundamental Frequency and the Hamonics-to-Noise Ratio of a Sampled Sound”, Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Cilt 17, s. 97-110.
2. B. Boyanov, S. Hadjitodorov (1997): “Acoustic Analysis of Pathological Voices”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Cilt 16, s. 74-81.
3. E. J. Ciaccio, S. M. Dunn, M. Akay (1993): “Biosignal Pattern Recognition and Interpretation Systems”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Cilt 12, s. 89-97.
4. H. Demuth, M. Beale (2002): “Neural Network Toolbox for Use with MATLAB”.
5. J. L. Godino-Llorente, S. Aguilero-Navarro, P. Gomez-Vilda (2000): “Non-supervised Neural Net Applied to the Detection of Voice Impairment”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, s. 3594-3597.
6. S. Hadjitodorov, B. Boyanov, B. Teston (2000): “Laryngeal Pathology Detection by Means of Class-specific Neural Maps”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Cilt 4, s. 68-73.
7. J. H. L. Hansen, L. Gavidia-Ceballos, J. F. Kaiser (1998): “A Nonlinear Operator-based Speech Feature Analysis Method with Application to Vocal Fold Pathology Assessment”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Cilt 45, s. 300-313.
8. H. K. Heris, B. S. Aghazadeh, M. Nikkhah-Bahrami (2009): “Optimal Feature Selection for the Assessment of Vocal Fold Disorders”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Cilt 39, s. 860-868.

9. F. Jabloun, A. E. Çetin, E. Erzin (1999): “Teager Energy Based Feature Parameters for Speech Recognition in Car Noise”, Cilt 6, s. 259-261.
10. C. W. Jo, H: Kim (1999): “Classification of Pathological Voice into Normal/Benign/Malign State”, Proceedings of Eurospeech, s. 571-574.
11. M. A. Kılıç, E. Okur (2001): “CSL ve Dr. Spech ile Ölçülen Temel Frekans ve Pertürbasyon Değerlerinin Karşılaşırılması” KBB İhtisas Dergisi, Cilt 8, s. 152-157.
12. C. Manfredi, M. D’aniello, P. Bruscagliani, A. Ismaelli (2000): “A Comparative Analysis of Fundemenal Frequency Estimation Methods with Application to Pathological Voices”, Medical Engineering & Physics, Cilt 22, s. 135-147.
13. C. E. Martinez, R. L. Hugo (2000): “Acoustic Analysis of Speech for Detection of Laryngeal Pathologies”, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual EMBS International Conference, s. 2369- 2372.
14. M. F. Moller (1993): “A Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Fast supervised Learning”, Neural Networks, Cilt 6, s. 525-533.
15. E. Nemer, R. Goubran, S. Mahmoud (2001): “Robust Voice Activity Detection Using Higher- order Statistics in the LPC Residual Domain”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Cilt 9, s. 217-231.
16. S. Osowski, T. H. Linh (2001): “ECG Beat Recogniton Using Fuzzy Hybrid Neural Network”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Cilt 48, s. 1265-1271.
17. J. C. Principe, N. R. Euliano, W. C. Lefebvre (2000): “Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundementals through Simulations”, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
18. M. M. Sondhi (1968): “New Methods of Pitch Extraction”, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, Cilt 16, s. 262-266.
19. A. H. Tewfik, D. Sinha, P. Jorgensen (1992): “On the Optimal Choice of a Wavelet for Signal Representation”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Cilt 38, s. 747-765.
20. Z. Tüfekci, J. N. Gowdy (2000): “Feature Extraction Using Discrete Wavelet Transfrom for Speech Recognition”, Proceedings of the IEEE Southeastcon, s. 116-123.
21. V. Uloza, A. Verikas, M. Bacauskiene, A. Gelzinis, R. Pribuisiene, M. Kaseta, V. Saferis (2011): ”Categorizing Normal and Pathological Voices: Automated and Perceptual Categorization”, Journal of Voice, Cilt 25, s. 700-708.
22. P. Veprek, M: S. Scordilis (2002): “Analysis, Enhancement and Evaluation of Five Pitch Determination Techniques”, Speech Communication, Cilt 37, s. 249-270.
23. X. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Yan (2011): “Discrimination Between Pathological and Normal Voices Using GMM-SVM Approach”, Journal of Voice, Cilt 25, s. 38-43.
24. E. Yumoto, W. J. Gould (1982): “Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio as An Index of the Degree of Hoarness”, Journal Acoustical Society of America, Cilt 71, s. 1544-1550.