ENERGY EFFICIENT ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR UNDERWATER WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 44, 27 - 38, 01.05.2013

Yonca Bayrakdar Aylin Kantarcı

Öz

The charasteristic features of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks, such as high
propagation delays and error rates, low bandwidth and limited energy sources make the
protocol design issue challenging for those environments. Besides all those difficulties, it is
very expensive to change or recharge the drained energy sources of the sensor nodes. Thus it
is very imortant to consider energy efficiency while developing protocols for those
environments. In this study, with the aim of reducing the total energy consumption and
extending the lifetime of the network by balancing the energy consumption of the nodes, a
protocol named Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
is proposed. Experiments with NS-2, Miracle and underwatermiracle extensions show that
Energy Efficient Routing Protocol is successful in terms of the total energy consumption,
success rate and end-to-end delay.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Underwater wireless sensor networks, Energy efficient routing protocols

SUALTI KABLOSUZ ALGILAYICI AĞLARI İÇIN ENERJI ETKİN YÖNLENDIRME PROTOKOLÜ

Öz

propagation delays and error rates, low bandwidth and limited energy sources make the protocol design issue challenging for those environments. Besides all those difficulties, it is very expensive to change or recharge the drained energy sources of the sensor nodes. Thus it is very imortant to consider energy efficiency while developing protocols for those environments. In this study, with the aim of reducing the total energy consumption and extending the lifetime of the network by balancing the energy consumption of the nodes, a protocol named Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks is proposed. Experiments with NS-2, Miracle and underwatermiracle extensions show that Energy Efficient Routing Protocol is successful in terms of the total energy consumption, success rate and end-to-end delay

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sualtı kablosuz algılayıcı ağları, Enerji etkin yönlendirme protokolleri

Kaynakça

• Ayaz M., Abdullah A. (2009): "Hop-by-hop Dynamic Addressing Based (h2-dab) Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks”, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information and Multimedia Technology, Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, s.436–441.
• Ayaz M., Baig I., Abdullah A., Faye I. (2011): “A Survey on Routing Techniques in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, s.34-39.
• Baldo N., Maguolo F., Miozzo M., Rossi M., Zorzi M. (2007): “ns2-Miracle: A Modular Framework for Multi-Technology and Cross-Layer Support in Network Simulator 2”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, ICST, Brüksel, Belçika, ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), s.1-8.
• Bayrakdar Y., Meratnia N., Kantarcı A. (2011): “A Comparative View of Routing Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks”, OCEANS, 2011 IEEE, İspanya, s.1-5.
• Çayırcı E., Tezcan H., Doğan Y., Coşkun V. (2006): “Wireless Sensor Networks for Underwater Survelliance Systems”, Ad Hoc Networks, Sayı 4, s.431.
• Chen Y. S., Juang T. Y., Lin Y. W., Tsai I. C. (2010): “A Low Propagation Delay Multi-Path Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks”, Journal of Internet Technology, Sayı 11, s.153-165.
• Domingo M. C., Prior R. (2007): “Design and Analysis of a GPS-Free Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks in Deep Water”, Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, Washington, DC, Amerika, IEEE Computer Society, s.215-220.
• Gopi S., Kannan K., Chander D., Desai U. B., Merchant S. N. (2008): “Pulrp: Path Unaware Layered Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks”, ICC, s.3141-3145.
• Guo Z., Colombi G., Wang B., Hong Cui J., Maggiorini D., Rossi G. P. (2009): “Adaptive Routing in Underwater Delay/Disruption Tolerant Sensor Networks”.
• Hai Yan, Z. J. S., Cui, J. H. (2008): “DBR: Depth-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks”, Sayı 4982/2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, s.72-86.
• Heidemann J., Ye W.,Wills J., Syed A., Li Y. (2006): “Research Challenges and Applications for Underwater Sensor Networking”, Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, s.228-235.
• Jornet J. M., Stojanovic M., Zorzi M. (2008): “Focused Beam Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks”, Proceedings of the Third ACM international Workshop on Underwater Networks, New York, Amerika, ACM, s.75-82.
• Lanbo L., Shengli Z., Jun-Hong C. (2008): “Prospects and Problems of Wireless Communication for Underwater Sensor Networks”, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Sayı 8, No. 8, s.977.
• Lee U., Wang P., Noh Y., Vieira L., Gerla M., Cui J. H. (2010): “Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks”, INFOCOM, 2010 Proceedings IEEE, s.1.-9
• Nicolaou N., See A., Xie P., Cui J. H., Maggiorini D. (2007): “Improving the Robustness of Location-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks”, OCEANS 2007, s.1-6.
• Partan J., Kurose J., Levine B. N. (2007): “A Survey of Practical Issues in Underwater Networks”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks, ACM, New York, Amerika, s.17-24.
• Proakis J., Sozer E., Rice J., Stojanovic M. (2001): “Shallow Water Acoustic Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Sayı 39, s.114.
• Sözer E., Stojanovic M., Proakis J. (2000): “Underwater Acoustic Networks”, Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal, Sayı 25, s.72.
• Xie P., Hong Cui J., Lao L. (2005): “Vbf: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks”, Proc. of IFIP Networking, s.1216-1221.