The Investigation of Three Dental Composite Samples by Using XRF, FT-IR Spectroscopic Methods and SEM Method

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 60, 1010 - 1017, 15.09.2018

Ünal Şahinci Sema Öztürk Yıldırım

Öz

Dental
composites are widely-used dental restoration materials that they are both
aesthetical and they can easily simulate the natural appearance of teeth. In
this study, determination of structural parameters of three different types of
dental composite resin samples, which are widely used by dentists, was done by
using spectroscopic analysis methods. Compounds and elements in the structure
of resin samples were determined through X-Ray Fluorescent Spectrometer (XRF),
Fourier Transformational Infrared Spectrometer (FT-IR) and Scanning Electron
Microscope (SEM) methods. the compounds are 6-heptenoicacid, 2-metilbutyricacid,
ethyleneoxidepressure, propionicacid, 5-metil 3-hexanone, linoleicacid,
1-napthylaceticacid, 4-hydroxy 4-metil 2-pentanone, trichloroacetonitrile,
benzyl ethyl ketone, 3-mercaptopropionicacid, oleicacid, 4-metil 2-pentanone,
erucicacid, deoxycholicacid and, the elements are Si, Zr, Hf, Na, Al, Ca, S, Ti,
Fe, K, Y, Ba, P, Cl, Sr, F, Zn. As a result of Compressive-Tensile Strength
Test, stress, elastic strain, ultimate strength range and maximum percentage
elongation levels were determined as 10982.9-12867.1N/mm2; 0,00827-0.05214mm;
6987.00-13650.2N and  77.4643-160.420.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental Composite XRF, FT-IR, SEM

XRF, FT-IR Spektroskopik Yöntemleri ve SEM Yöntemi Kullanılarak Üç Dental Kompozit Örneklerin İncelenmesi

Öz

Günümüzde doğal dişin görünümünü taklit edebilen ve estetik olması
nedeniyle dental kompozitlerin dental restorasyon malzemesi olarak kullanımı
oldukça yaygındır.

Bu çalışmada diş hekimlerinin çoğunlukla kullandığı üç
farklı dental kompozit rezinin örneklerinin yapısal parametrelerinin tespiti spektroskopik
analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. X-Işını Floresans Spektrometresi (XRF),
Fourier Dönüşümlü Infrared Spektrofotometresi (FT-IR) ve Taramalı Elektron
Mikroskobu (SEM) yöntemi ile yapılan element analizlerinde rezin örneklerinin
yapısında bulunan bileşikler ve elementler tespit edilmiştir. Bileşikler
6-heptenoik asit, 2-metilbütirik asit, etilen oksit, propiyonik asit, 5-metil
3-heksanon, linoleik asit, 1-naftalenasetik asit, 4-hidroksi 4-metil 2-pentanon,
trikloroasetonitril, benzil etil keton, 3-mercaptopropionik asit, oleik asit,
4-metil 2-pentanon, erüsik asit, deoksikolik
asit’dir. Elemetler ise Si, Zr, Hf, Na, Al, Ca, S, Ti, Fe,
K, Y, Ba, P, Cl, Sr, F, Zn’dir.  Fiziksel
olarak yapılan basma çekme testi sonucunda örneklerin maksimum gerilme, elastik
uzama, maksimum kuvvet aralığı ve maksimum yüzde uzama miktarları: 10982.9-12867.1N/mm²;
0,00827-0.05214mm; 6987.00-13650.2N ve 77.4643-160.420 olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental Kompozit, XRF, FT-IR, SEM

Kaynakça

• [1] Baum L, Phillips RW, Lund MR. 1985. Textbook Of Operative Dentistry. Tooth Colored Restratives. 2th. Edition, 206s.
• [2] Bayırlı G, Şirin T. 1982. Konservatif Diş tedavisi. Dünya Tıp Kitapevi Ltd. Şti. ss161-184, İstanbul.
• [3] Gladys S, Van MB, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. 1997. Comparative Physico-Mechanical Characterization Of New Hybrid Restorative Materials With Conventional Glass-İonomer And Resin Composite Restorative Materials. J Dent Res, Ss 883–894.
• [4] Peutzfeldt A. 1997. Resin Composites İn Dentistry: The Monomer Systems. Eur J Oral Sci. ss97-116.
• [5] Craig RG. 1989. Restorative Dental Materials 8th Ed. St. Louis.
• [6] Parker S, Braden M. 1998. Water Absorption Of Methacrylate Soft Lining Materials. Biomaterials, ss5-91.
• [7] Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. 1999. Polymerization Shrinkage And Elasticity Of Flowable Composites And Filled Adhesives. Dent Mater, Ss 37-128.
• [8] Moszner N, Salz U. 2001. New Developments Of Polymeric Dental Composites. Prog.Polym.Sci, ss 535-576.
• [9] Ikejima I, Nomoto R, Mccabe JF. 2003. Shear Punch Strength And Flexural Strength Of Model Composites With Varying Filler Volume Fraction, Particle Size And Silanation. Dent Mater, Ss 11-206.
• [10] Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. 2007. Characterization Of Nanofilled Compared To Universal And Microfilled Composites. Dent Mater. Ss 9-51.
• [11] Mitra SB, WU D, Holmes BN. 2003. An Application Of Nanotechnology İn Advanced Dental Materials. J Am Dent Assoc, ss90-1382.
• [12] Pu Z, Mark JE, Jethmalani JM, Ford WT. 1997. Effects Of Dispersion And Aggregation Of Silica İn The Reinforcement Of Poly(Methylacrylate) Elastomers. Chem Mater, ss7-2442.
• [13] Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. 2005. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials, ss4932–4937.
• [14] Sturdevant M, Roberson TM, Heyman HO, Sturdevant JR. 2000.The Art And Science Of Operative dentistry, 3rd ed. StLouis, :Mosby.
• [15] O’Brien WJ. 2002. Dental Materials And Their Selection. Polymeric Restorative Metarials. 3th Edition, Canada, ss113-116.
• [16] Venhoven BAM, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. 1996. Influence of filler parameters on the mechanical coherence of dental restorative resin composites. Biomaterials, ss40-735.
• [17] Rothmunda L, Hea X, Van KL, Helmut Schweikl L, Hellwig E, Carell T , Reinhar H, Reichl F-X, Högga C. 2005. Effect of Opalescence®bleaching gels on theelution of dental composite components. Biomaterials. 26, ss 1713–1719.
• [18] Hervás García A, Martínez Lozano M A, Vila JC, Barjau Escribano A, Fos Galve P. 2006. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 11, E215-20.