A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF INERTEY OF INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL STUPIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONS

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4 , 1734 - 1749 , 20.12.2023

Ela Burcu Ucel

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1353171

Cited By: 1

https://izlik.org/JA93FG48HF

Öz

Organizational stupidity has not attracted as much academic attention as organizational intelligence. The concept is defined as limiting employee’s use of conceptual abilities and intellectual capacity; employee’s unwillingness to use these and the lack of reflexivity, justification and reasoning in the organization. Organizational stupidity is reportedly promoted by the organization as it helps maintaining organizational order. On the other side, it causes the intellectual capacity to be idle in the organization. It harms decision making skills and organization’s ability to adapt environmental changes. The fact that competition gets thougher and the environment gets more unstable and dynamic each day highlights the importance of organization’s adaptive abilities and the role human capital plays in it. Thus, organizations should try being immune to organizational stupidity which is labelled as an organizational illness. A participative work environment, supportive and empowering organizational culture and a managerial style that promotes communication, information sharing and critical thinking in the organization are needed. The current study will provide an overall look to organizational stupidity through the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Stupidity , Collective Stupidity , Functional Stupidity , Organizational Intelligence.

ÖRGÜTLERDE ENTELEKTÜEL KAPASİTENİN ATALETİ ve ÖRGÜTSEL AHMAKLIK (ORGANIZATIONAL STUPIDITY) KAVRAMINA GENEL BİR BAKIŞ

https://izlik.org/JA93FG48HF

Öz

Örgütsel ahmaklık (örgütsel aptallık) kavramı örgütsel zekâ kadar akademik ilgi çekememiş, sınırlı sayıda çalışmaya konu olmuştur. Çalışanın bilişsel kaynaklarının ve entelektüel kapasitesinin kullanımının kısıtlanması, ya da bu kapasiteyi kullanmaktaki isteksizliği olarak tanımlanan kavram, örgütte düşünümselliğin, karar ve faaliyetleri sorgulamanın ve eleştirel düşüncenin yokluğu olarak da tarif edilmektedir. Örgütsel ahmaklığın kurum tarafından teşvik edildiği belirtilmektedir, çünkü örgütsel düzenin sağlanmasını olumlu etkilemektedir. Öte yandan kurumda entelektüel kapasitenin atıl kalması, karar verme becerisinin ve çevresel değişimlere uyum kapasitesinin azalması gibi oldukça olumsuz sonuçları da vardır. Gittikçe artan rekabet, sürekli hale gelen değişim ve belirsizlik örgütlerin çevreyi anlama, değişimi okuma ve uyum sağlama becerilerinin önemine vurgu yapmakta, insan sermayesinin bu süreçteki kritik değerini öne çıkarmaktadır. Dolayısıyla kurumların bir hastalık olarak adlandırılan örgütsel ahmaklığa karşı bağışıklık kazanmaları gerekmektedir. Katılımcı bir çalışma ortamı, destekleyici ve güçlendirici bir örgüt kültürü ve çalışanların birbirleriyle haberleşmelerini, bilgi paylaşmalarını ve eleştirel düşünceyi teşvik eden bir yönetim tarzı gibi uygulamalar entelektüel kapasitenin azami kullanımı ve örgütsel ahmaklıktan kaçınma için önerilenlerden birkaçıdır. Bu çalışma, örgütsel ahmaklığı alanyazında yer alan çalışmalar ışığında inceleyerek kavrama ilişkin genel bir bakış sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Ahmaklık , Fonksiyonel Ahmaklık , Toplu Ahmaklık , Örgütsel Aptallık , Örgütsel Zekâ.

Kaynakça

• Ahmadzadeh, S., Safari, A., & Teimouri, H. (2022). Collective stupidity: influences on decision-making in knowledge-based companies. Management Decision, 60 (5), 1257-1295.
• Albrecht, K. (1980). Brain power: learn to develop your thinking skills. Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall.
• Albrecht, K. (2002). Organizational intelligence & knowledge management: Thinking outside the silos. Executive White Paper, 1, 17.
• Albrecht, K. (2003). The power of minds at work: Organizational intelligence in action. Amacom Books.
• Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2018). Excessive work regimes and functional stupidity. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 32 (3-4), 283-296.
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity‐based theory of organizations. Journal of management studies, 49 (7), 1194-1220.
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2016). The stupidity paradox: The power and pitfalls of functional stupidity at work. Profile Books, Brooklyn, 1-188.
• Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2012). Making sense of management: A critical introduction. Sage.
• Argyris, C. (1986). Reinforcing organizational defensive routines: An unintended human resources activity. Human Resource Management, 25 (4), 541-555.
• Ashforth, B. E., & Fried, Y. (1988). The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations, 41 (4), 305-329.
• Azevedo, G. (2023). Into the realm of organizational folly: A poem, a review, and a typology of organizational stupidity. Management Learning, 54 (2), 267-281.
• Bach, C., & Sulíková, R. (2021). Leadership in the context of a NewWorld: digital leadership and industry 4.0. Managing global transitions, 19 (3).
• Bakken, T., & Wiik, E. L. (2018). Ignorance and organization studies. Organization Studies, 39 (8), 1109-1120.
• Bernstein, J. H. (2009). Nonknowledge: The bibliographical organization of ignorance, stupidity, error, and unreason: Part one. KO Knowledge Organization, 36 (1), 17-29.
• Boxsel, M. V. (2003). The encyclopaedia of stupidity, Pomerans, Arnold and Pomerans, Erica trans. London: Reaktion.
• Butler, N. (2016). Functional stupidity: A critique. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 16 (2), 115-123.
• Caoa, L., & Xiaob, J. H. (2014). How to build a smarter institute: a perspective from intellectual capital synergy. In Global Interdisciplinary Business-Economics Advancement Conference Proceedings (p. 58).
• Coraiola, D. M., & Murcia, M. J. (2020). From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field. Management Learning, 51 (2), 227-240.
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
• Demitras, D., & Sarjoko, S. (2018). Effects of handep cooperative learning based on indigenous knowledge on mathematical problem solving skill. International journal of instruction, vol 11 (2), pp.103-112.
• Doaee, M., Shirvani, A., & Safari, A. (2013). Proposing a model for collective stupidity: identification and assessment of the effective factors (aviation service company). American Journal of Scientific Research, 92, 125-137.
• Ellison, H. (2023). Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/stupidity
• Eisner, H. (2011). Managing complex systems: thinking outside the box (Vol. 34). John Wiley & Sons.
• Erçetin, Ş.Ş (2001). Örgütsel zekâ. Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
• Erçetin, Ş. (2004). Örgütsel zekâ ve örgütsel aptallık. Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
• Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Bağcı, E. (2016). Handbook of research on chaos and complexity theory in the social sciences, IGI Global, 10.4018978-1-5225-0148.0.
• Erçetin, Ş., Çetin, B., & Potas, K., N. (2007). Multi Dimensional Organizational Intelligence Scale MULDIMORINS. World Applied Science Journal.
• Erçetin, S., Potas, N., Kısa, N., & Açıkalın, S. N. (2012). To be on the edge of chaos with organizational intelligence and health. Chaos and complexity theory for management: Nonlineer Dynamics, 182-201.
• Foley M (2010). The age of absurdity: Why modern life makes it hard to be happy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Ghorashi Bonabi, A. A. (2012). Qamoos Quran.
• Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academic Management Review, 21 (4), 1081-1111.
• Howson, C. (2007). Successful business intelligence. Emeryville: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.
• Karadağ, İ. (2016). Deleuze ve Aptallık. Cogito, 82, 44-68. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Karimi-Ghartemani, S., Khani, N., & Esfahani, A. N. (2020). Developing a framework for organizational stupidity. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31 (2), 100392.
• Karimi-Ghartemani, S., Khani, N., & Nasr Isfahani, A. (2022). A qualitative analysis and a conceptual model for organizational stupidity. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35 (3), 441-462.
• Kerfoot, K. (2003). Organizational intelligence/organizational stupidity: The leader's challenge. Nursing economics, 21 (2), 91.
• Khoreva, V., Vaiman, V., & Van Zalk, M. (2017). Talent management practice effectiveness: investigating employee perspective. Employee Relations, 39 (1), 19-33.
• Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342 (6156), 377-380.
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic management journal, 14 (S2), 95-112.
• Mack, O., & Khare, A. (2016). Perspectives on a VUCA World. Managing in a VUCA World, 3-19.
• Manville, B. & Ober, J. (2003). Beyond empowerment: Building a company of citizens. Harvard business review, 81 (1), 48-53.
• Matzler, K., Strobl, A., & Bailom, F. (2016). Leadership and the wisdom of crowds: how to tap into the collective intelligence of an organization. Strategy & Leadership, 44 (1), 30-35.
• Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management annals, 5 (1), 373-412.
• Osho (2001). Intuition. Griffin Publishing, USA.
• Ott, J. S., & Shafritz, J. M. (1994). Toward a definition of organizational incompetence: a neglected variable in organization theory. Public Administration Review, 370-377.
• Paulsen, R. (2017). Slipping into functional stupidity: The bifocality of organizational compliance. Human Relations, 70 (2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0018726716649246.
• Paulsen, R. (2018). In the mood for obedience: Despair, cynicism, and seduction among employment service employees. Culture and Organization, 24 (5), 365-382.
• Reid, M. D., Bekbalaeva, J., Bedford, D., Garcia-Perez, A., & Jones, D. (2021). Learning at the organization level. In Learning Organizations (pp. 89-101). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Ronnell, A. (2002). Stupidity. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
• Sims, D. (2005). You bastard: A narrative exploration of the experience of indignation within organizations. Organization Studies 26 (11): 1625–1640.
• Skaggs, B. C., & Youndt, M. (2004). Strategic positioning, human capital, and performance in service organizations: A customer interaction approach. Strategic management journal, 25 (1), 85-99.
• Spicer, A., Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human relations, 62 (4), 537-560.
• Stanovich, K. E. (2002). ‘Rationality, intellegence and levels of analysis in cognitive science: Is dysrationalia possible?’, içinde Sternberg, R. J. (ed.) Why Smart People Can Be So Stupid. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
• Sternberg, R. J. (ed.) (2002). Why Smart People Can Be So Stupid. Yale University Press.New Haven & London.
• Syvajarvi, A., & Kesti, M. (2012). Positive human tacit signal approach and competence system intelligence in organization. Emotional Intelligence- New Perspectives and Applications İçinde. Intech Publications, European Union, Rijeka.(139-166).
• Ten Bos, R. (2007). The vitality of stupidity. Social Epistemology, 21, 139-50.
• Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlüğü (2023). www.sozluk.gov.tr
• Usmani, M., Davison, J., & Napier, C. J. (2020, October). The production of stand-alone sustainability reports: visual impression management, legitimacy and “functional stupidity”. Accounting Forum (Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 315-343). Routledge.
• Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of management studies, 30 (4), 515-552.
• Van Laar, D. M., Kitchens, M. E., Koskey, J. T. (2020). Measuring knowledge management maturity in US Army headquarters. Knowledge and Process Management, 27 (4), 311-321.
• Veryard, R. (2012). Building organizational intelligence, Leanpub. New York.
• Yıldırım, Ö. (2020). Refleksivite (Reflexivity) Nedir? Felsefe. https://www.felsefe.gen.tr/refleksivite-reflexivity-nedir/