SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TÜKETİM DAVRANIŞININ DİNAMİKLERİ: ÇEVRESEL KAYGI VE FİYAT DUYARLILIĞININ ROLÜ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4, 1762 - 1788, 29.12.2025

Onur Terzi

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1719107

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı tüketicilerin çevresel kaygı düzeylerinin ve fiyat duyarlılıklarının sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Araştırma kapsamında Aydın il merkezinde yaşayan 309 kişiden kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile toplanan veriler, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada sürdürülebilir tüketim, çevresel kaygı ve fiyat duyarlılığının etkileri doğrultusunda çevre duyarlılığı, ihtiyaç dışı satın alma, tasarruf ve yeniden kullanılabilirlik olmak üzere dört alt boyut üzerinden değerlendirilmiş ancak yeniden kullanılabilirlik boyutu düşük güvenilirlik nedeniyle analize dahil edilmemiştir. Yapılan analizler neticesinde çevresel kaygı ile çevre duyarlılığı ve tasarruf boyutları arasında anlamı ve pozitif, ihtiyaç dışı satın alma boyutu ile anlamlı ve negatif yönlü ilişkiler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Fiyat duyarlılığı ile tasarruf boyutu arasında anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu ancak ihtiyaç dışı satın alma boyutu ile istatiksel olarak herhangi bir ilişki olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca fiyat duyarlılığı ile çevre duyarlılığı boyutu arasında beklenilen aksine anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Bu bulgular, sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarını etkileyen çevresel kaygı ve fiyat duyarlılığı gibi faktörlerin karmaşık etkileşimlerini ortaya koymakta olup, hem akademik literatüre hem de pratikteki uygulamalara katkılar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilir Tüketim , Çevresel Kaygı , Fiyat Duyarlılığı , Çevresel Duyarlılık

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için etik kurul onayı alınmıştır.

THE DYNAMICS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN AND PRICE SENSITIVITY

Öz

This study aims to investigate how consumers’ levels of environmental concern and price sensitivity influence their sustainable consumption behaviors. To achieve this, data were gathered from 309 individuals residing in the city center of Aydın through a convenience sampling method and analyzed using structural equation modeling. In the study, sustainable consumption was evaluated in four sub-dimensions, namely environmental sensitivity, unnecessary purchases, savings and reusability, in line with the effects of environmental concern and price sensitivity. However, the reusability dimension was excluded from the analysis due to low reliability. The findings indicated a significant positive association between environmental concern and both the environmental sensitivity and savings dimensions, while a significant negative association was observed with the unnecessary purchase dimension. Moreover, price sensitivity was found to be positively and significantly related to the savings dimension, whereas no statistically significant relationship was identified with the unnecessary purchase dimension. Interestingly, and contrary to initial assumptions, a significant positive relationship emerged between price sensitivity and the environmental sensitivity dimension. These findings reveal the complex interactions of factors such as environmental concern and price sensitivity that affect sustainable consumption behaviors and contribute to both academic literature and practical applications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Consumption , Environmental Concern , Price Sensitivity , Environmental Sensitivity

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval has been obtained for this study.

Kaynakça

• Abdullah-Al-Mamun, M. K. R., & Robel, S. D. (2014). A critical review of consumers’ sensitivity to price: Managerial and theoretical issues. Journal of International Business and Economics, 2 (2), 1-9.
• Alam, S. S., Wang, C.-K., Masukujjaman, M., Ahmad, I., Lin, C.-Y., & Ho, Y.-H. (2023). Buying behaviour towards eco-labelled food products: Mediation moderation analysis. Sustainability, 15 (3), 2474.
• Alhomssi, M. A., & Ali, A. E. A. (2024). The influence of environmental consciousness and environmental attitude on green purchase ıntention: The moderating effect of price sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Impact and Management Policy, 4 (2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.55529/jeimp.42.19.30
• Alvarez-Suárez, P., Vega-Marcote, P., & Garcia Mira, R. (2013). Sustainable consumption: A teaching intervention in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15 (1), 3-15.
• Anquez, E., Raab, K., Cechella, F. S., & Wagner, R. (2022). Consumers’ perception of sustainable packaging in the food industry: An online experiment. Revista Direitos Culturais, 17 (41), 251-265.
• Avci, İ. (2023). Sustainable water consumption and water‐saving behaviours: A review of consumers’ environmental and economic concerns in Turkey. Water and Environment Journal, 37 (3), 616-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12869
• Ayar, D., Gözüaçık, B., & Şen, B. (2024). Effect of global climate change concern on environmental sensitivity of nursing students. Public Health Nursing, 42 (1), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13434
• Azar, O. H. (2011). Does relative thinking exist in real‐world situations? A field experiment with bagels and cream cheese. Economic Inquiry, 49 (2), 564-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00285.x
• Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of environmental psychology, 23 (1), 21-32.
• Blake, D. E. (2001). Contextual effects on environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33 (5), 708-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973205
• Čapienė, A., Rūtelionė, A., & Krukowski, K. (2022). Engaging in sustainable consumption: Exploring the influence of environmental attitudes, values, personal norms, and perceived responsibility. Sustainability, 14 (16), 10290.
• Chekima, B., Chekima, S., Syed Khalid Wafa, S. A. W., Igau, O. A., & Sondoh, S. L. (2016). Sustainable consumption: The effects of knowledge, cultural values, environmental advertising, and demographics. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23 (2), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1114043
• Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10 (1), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346398010001004
• Do Paco, A., & Raposo, M. (2009). “Green” segmentation: An application to the Portuguese consumer market. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27 (3), 364-379.
• Doğan, O., Bulut, Z. A., & Çımrın, F. K. (2015). Bireylerin sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarının ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Ataturk University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 29 (4).
• Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of environmental sociology, 3 (6), 482-524.
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale–statistical data ıncluded. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 425-442.
• Ewe, S. Y., & Tjiptono, F. (2023). Green behavior among Gen Z consumers in an emerging market: Eco-friendly versus non-eco-friendly products. Young Consumers, 24 (2), 234-252.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• Ghaffar, A., Zaheer Zaidi, S. S., & Islam, con T. (2023). An investigation of sustainable consumption behavior: The influence of environmental cern and trust in sustainable producers on consumer xenocentrism. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34 (3), 771-793.
• Ghazali, E. M., Mutum, D. S., & Ariswibowo, N. (2018). Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42 (6), 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12472
• Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin Jr, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of retailing, 89 (1), 44-61.
• Goldsmith, R. E. (1996). Service innovativeness and price sensitivity: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the Association of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5, 85-91.
• Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., & Kim, D. (2010). Status consumption and price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18 (4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180402
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (1997). Innovativeness and price sensitivity: Managerial, theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6 (3), 163-174.
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31 (1), 2-24.
• Hedlund, T. (2011). The impact of values, environmental concern, and willingness to accept economic sacrifices to protect the environment on tourists’ intentions to buy ecologically sustainable tourism alternatives. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 11 (4), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358411423330
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Horani, L. F., & Dong, L. (2023). Understanding sustainable purchase intention of smartphone users interface: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1122801.
• Hornibrook, S., May, C., & Fearne, A. (2015). Sustainable development and the consumer: exploring the role of carbon labelling in retail supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24 (4), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1823
• Hsieh, A. T., & Chang, E. T. (2004). The effect of consumer participation on price sensitivity. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38 (2), 282-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2004.tb00869.x
• Jackson, T. (2005). Live better by consuming less?: Is there a “Double Dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1-2), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084734
• Jannah, F., & Wulandari, A. (2024). The influence of environmental accounting knowledge, environmental sensitivity, and CSR knowledge on accounting students environmental sustainability behavior. Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7 (1), 125-140.
• Kaczorowska, J., Rejman, K., Halicka, E., Szczebyło, A., & Górska-Warsewicz, H. (2019). Impact of food sustainability labels on the perceived product value and price expectations of urban consumers. Sustainability, 11 (24), 7240.
• Karalar, R., & Kiracı, H. (2011). Çevresel sorunlara karşi bir çözüm önerisi olarak sürdürülebilir tüketim düşüncesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30, 63-76.
• Kim, N., & Lee, K. (2023). Environmental consciousness, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: The moderating impact of situational context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (7), 5312.
• Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in consumer research, 32, 592.
• Kropfeld, M. I., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Dantas, D. C. (2018). The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37 (2), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810448
• Lazaric, N., Le Guel, F., Belin, J., Oltra, V., Lavaud, S., & Douai, A. (2020). Determinants of sustainable consumption in France: The importance of social influence and environmental values. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30 (5), 1337-1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00654-7
• Lee, J. E., & Chen-Yu, J. H. (2018). Effects of price discount on consumers’ perceptions of savings, quality, and value for apparel products: Mediating effect of price discount affect. Fashion and Textiles, 5 (1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-018-0128-2
• Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy–beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33-44.
• Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Rose, R. L., Catlin, J. R., Gau, R., Kapitan, S., Mish, J., Ozanne, L., Phipps, M., & Simpson, B. (2011). Toward a sustainable marketplace: Expanding options and benefits for consumers. Journal of Research Consumers,19,1-12.
• Malik, C., Singhal, N., & Tiwari, S. (2017). Antecedents of consumer environmental attitude and intention to purchase green products: Moderating role of perceived product necessity. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 20 (5/6), 259. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2017.091290
• Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31 (4), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00586.x
• Mont, O., & Plepys, A. (2008). Sustainable consumption progress: Should we be proud or alarmed? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (4), 531-537.
• Montreuil Carmona, L. J., Barretto, A. G. P., & Bacinello, E. (2024). Does intention translate into actual purchase? Analysis of inducers of sustainable consumption in higher education students. Young Consumers, 25 (1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2023-1710
• Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2017). Energy efficient household appliances in emerging markets: The influence of consumers’ values and knowledge on their attitudes and purchase behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41 (2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12323
• Okur, N., Saricam, C., Iri, A. R., & Sari, I. (2023). Analyzing the impact of Covid-19 on sustainable fashion consumption with a model based on consumer value perceptions. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 27 (5), 826-850. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2021-0272
• Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help? American Psychologist, 55 (5), 496.
• Paço, A., & Gouveia Rodrigues, R. (2016). Environmental activism and consumers’ perceived responsibility. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40 (4), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12272
• Pagiaslis, A., & Krontalis, A. K. (2014). Green consumption behavior antecedents: environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs: Antecedents of green consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 31 (5), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20698
• Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54 (1), 51.
• Quoquab, F., & Mohammad, J. (2020). A review of sustainable consumption (2000 to 2020): What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Global Marketing, 33 (5), 305-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1811441
• Rahimah, A., Khalil, S., Cheng, J. M., Tran, M. D., & Panwar, V. (2018). Understanding green purchase behavior through death anxiety and individual social responsibility: Mastery as a moderator. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17 (5), 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1733
• Rizkalla, N., & Erhan, T. P. (2020). Sustainable consumption behaviour in the context of millennials in Indonesia–can environmental concern, self-efficacy, guilt and subjective knowledge make a difference? Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 25 (3), 43-54.
• Ru, X., Chen, M., Wang, S., & Chen, Z. (2021). Does environmental concern fail to predict energy-saving behavior? A study on the office energy-saving behavior of employees of Chinese Internet companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-21.
• Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155.
• Salazar, H. A., Oerlemans, L., & Van Stroe‐Biezen, S. (2013). Social influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioural experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37 (2), 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01110.x
• Sang, Y.-N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75-83.
• Schaefer, A., & Crane, A. (2005). Addressing Sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25 (1), 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146705274987
• Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962
• Seyfang, G. (2006). Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(4), 383-395.
• Sharma, N., Paço, A., & Kautish, P. (2022). The impact of eco-innovation on green buying behaviour: The moderating effect of emotional loyalty and generation. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(4), 1026-1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2021-0267
• Shen, X., Xu, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022). Predicting sustainable food consumption across borders based on the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic structural equation model. PloS one, 17(11), e0275312.
• Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., & Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their ımplications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673477
• Susilowati, D., Miarsyah, M., & Sigit, D. V. (2020). The influence of environmental sensitivity, knowledge and desire ıssues (intention to act) with students behaviour as state citizens towards environment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(8). https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/ijevs/article/view/2764
• Szczepaniak, M., & Szulc-Obłoza, A. (2024). Sustainable consumption consciousness and middle-ıncome class affiliation: Theory and evidence from Poland. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 38(4), 1117-1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254231212486
• Szilagyi, A., Cioca, L.-I., Bacali, L., Lakatos, E.-S., & Birgovan, A.-L. (2022). Consumers in the circular economy: A path analysis of the underlying factors of purchasing behaviour. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(18), 1-12.
• Takács-Sánta, A. (2007). Barriers to environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 26-38.
• Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 141-163.
• Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010). The impacts of household consumption and options for change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00208.x
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Sustainable consumption and production policies. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/sustainable-consumption-and-production-policies
• Van Dam, Y. K., & Fischer, A. R. H. (2015). Buying green without being seen. Environment and Behavior, 47(3), 328-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513509481
• Vergragt, P., Akenji, L., & Dewick, P. (2014). Sustainable production, consumption, and livelihoods: Global and regional research perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 1-12.
• Villi, B. (2023). An empirical analysis of the nexus between climate change anxiety and sustainable consumption patterns among Turkish individuals. Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, 2(3), 110-121.
• Wang, J., Pham, T. L., & Dang, V. T. (2020). Environmental consciousness and organic food purchase intention: A moderated mediation model of perceived food quality and price sensitivity. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 17(3), 850.
• Wang, Y. (2017). Promoting sustainable consumption behaviors: The impacts of environmental attitudes and governance in a cross-national context. Environment and Behavior, 49(10), 1128-1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516680264
• Yan, R.-N., Bae, S. Y., & Xu, H. (2015). Second-hand clothing shopping among college students: The role of psychographic characteristics. Young Consumers, 16(1), 85-98.
• Yuan, R., Jin, S., & Lin, W. (2025). Could trust narrow the intention‐behavior gap in eco‐friendly food consumption? Evidence from China. Agribusiness, 41(1), 260-288. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21886
• Yue, B., Sheng, G., She, S., & Xu, J. (2020). Impact of consumer environmental responsibility on green consumption behavior in China: The role of environmental concern and price sensitivity. Sustainability, 12(5), 2074.
• Zakaria, N. F., Rahim, H. A., Paim, L., & Zakaria, N. F. (2019). The mediating effect of sustainable consumption attitude on association between perception of sustainable lifestyle and sustainable consumption practice. Asian Soc. Sci, 15, 100-115.
• Zeng, Z., Zhong, W., & Naz, S. (2023). Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 15(6), 4791.
• Zheng, W., Qiu, H., & Morrison, A. M. (2023). Applying a combination of SEM and fsQCA to predict tourist resource-saving behavioral intentions in rural tourism: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1349.
• Zulauf, K., & Wagner, R. (2022). Some have other crisis concerns: Antecedents of anxiety while grocery shopping. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 10(1), 1-18.